Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

What If Resistance to Change Is Not the Real Problem?

linkedin twitter facebook   Change Management   Leadership   Strategy  
avatar
Luis Branco CEO| Business Insight, Consultores de Gestão, Ldª Carcavelos, Lisboa, Portugal

What if organizations are not failing to transform because people resist change, but because the organization itself preserves the conditions that make transformation difficult?

We ask for speed, but preserve approval layers.

We ask for autonomy, but preserve centralized authority.

We ask for innovation, but preserve risk aversion.

We ask for learning, but still penalize error.

We ask for collaboration, but preserve local incentives.

Perhaps the real transformation gap lies somewhere else.

What do you think?

I explore this question in:

The True Gap in Organizational Transformation

Sort By:
avatar
Lissette Indhira Pimentel Sosa
Community Champion
Program Manager| HARPER SRL Santo Domingo / Distrito Nacional, Dominican Republic
Sometimes what we call resistance is simply people reacting to contradictions in the organization. It's difficult to ask teams to work differently when the structures, incentives, or decision-making processes around them haven't changed.
...
1 reply by Luis Branco
Aug 22, 2026 4:21 AM
Luis Branco
...
Exactly.
And this is why I think resistance should often be treated as a signal to investigate rather than a diagnosis of the people involved.

Organizational contradictions can make apparently resistant behaviour entirely rational.
If people are asked to act autonomously while authority remains centralized, or to experiment while failure is still punished, behaviour will tend to follow the conditions the organization actually preserves rather than the behaviours it says it wants.

Of course, not every form of resistance has the same cause.
That is precisely why understanding the mechanism matters before trying to overcome it.
Sometimes the intervention needs to address understanding or capability.
Sometimes the organizational conditions themselves need to change.
And sometimes both do.
avatar
Luis Branco CEO| Business Insight, Consultores de Gestão, Ldª Carcavelos, Lisboa, Portugal
Aug 21, 2026 12:21 PM
Replying to Lissette Indhira Pimentel Sosa
...
Sometimes what we call resistance is simply people reacting to contradictions in the organization. It's difficult to ask teams to work differently when the structures, incentives, or decision-making processes around them haven't changed.
Exactly.
And this is why I think resistance should often be treated as a signal to investigate rather than a diagnosis of the people involved.

Organizational contradictions can make apparently resistant behaviour entirely rational.
If people are asked to act autonomously while authority remains centralized, or to experiment while failure is still punished, behaviour will tend to follow the conditions the organization actually preserves rather than the behaviours it says it wants.

Of course, not every form of resistance has the same cause.
That is precisely why understanding the mechanism matters before trying to overcome it.
Sometimes the intervention needs to address understanding or capability.
Sometimes the organizational conditions themselves need to change.
And sometimes both do.
avatar
Kiron Bondale Retired | Mentor| Retired Welland, Ontario, Canada

Luis - This often comes down to the natural inertia created by folks wanting to preserve their mini-empires and agendas. Poorly designed performance measuring systems can also contribute to this.

"The bureaucratic mentality is the only constant in the universe." - Dr. Leonard McCoy

Kiron

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"You cannot prevent the birds of sorrow from flying over your head, but you can prevent them from building nests in your hair."

- Chinese Proverb

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors