Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

How is Ahead of Schedule really measured in everyday project management?

linkedin twitter facebook   Schedule Management  
avatar
Srikana Ray
Community Champion
Project Professional, PMP

I often see project management resumes and career-coaching posts highlighting projects that were delivered 2–3 weeks ahead of schedule.

I am curious about how this actually works in everyday project environments. When a project has fixed milestones, UAT, stakeholder approvals, dependencies and predetermined release or go-live dates, how do you define and measure being ahead of schedule?

For example, if the team completes the actual project work two weeks early but still has to wait for a scheduled release window, would you consider that project delivered ahead of schedule?

I would really like to hear about your experiences and insights on this. How common is it in your projects and how do you typically measure genuine schedule performance?

Sort By:
I think being ahead of schedule is more than just having a few tasks completed early. You also have to look at dependencies, the critical path, and whether the team actually has enough capacity to maintain that pace.
I’ve used KolApp for this kind of visibility and found the resource side particularly useful. It makes it easier to see project progress alongside team workload, which gives a better picture of whether being “ahead” is actually sustainable.
avatar
Keith Novak Tukwila, Wa, United States
It can work a few different ways. On a project using EVM, it can be merely a matter of more releases completed than due. That doesn't often mean much, as it might not account for things like first pass quality or we finished the easy tasks but are behind on the hard ones, and I find the discussion of the progress is more valuable than the SPI number itself.

Sometimes early finish has a clear value, such as when a contract payment schedule includes incentives for finishing early. When I upgraded entertainment systems on commercial airplanes, delivering ahead of schedule means the customer can start earning revenue from those pay-to-use services early during the heavy travel season, which greatly improves their business case. Similarly delivering a product to a customer for their own testing early means reduced risk from finding a problem because there is more time to fix it. In the case where the work is done, but waiting for a release window, the product might not be actually released and usable yet, but the people working on the product are freed up for other work. Likewise being ahead on one project might mean we can free up some important technical skill in short supply to help out a project that is behind. We can afford to go slower in one place, to go faster than another. These are examples of the importance of understanding the value potential for a project or specific tasks completing early, Instead of just looking whether SPI is positive or negative.
avatar
Sergio Luis Conte Helping to create solutions for everyone| Worldwide based Organizations Buenos Aires, Argentina
Fully aligned with Keith Novak here. Trying to add something the key point here is budget allocation. If you do not release the money in the right time mainly anticipating that the project will be close in advance then you are impaction organization finances.

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"I've always believed in the adage that the secret of eternal youth is arrested development."

- Alice Roosevelt Longworth

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors