Jonathan DoylePM Consultant| Adduco Consultancy LtdLondon, United Kingdom
Hello,
I am reading through the PMBOK 5th edition which I find very informative. In the project life cycle section in chapter 2 there are three defined cycles:
1. Predictive life cycle
2. Iterative and incremental life cycles
3. Adaptive life cycles
I fully understand the concept of the predictive life cycle which is what I would view as the traditional approach to Project Management but both the Adaptive life cycles and Iterative and incremental life cycles seem to be quite similar and lean more towards Agile than waterfall. What I am struggling to relate to is how different Adaptive life cycles and Iterative and incremental life cycles are when used in a business environment. Based on their definition in the PMBOK 5th Edition they seem to me to be just slightly different versions of Agile.
Does anyone have any real life examples of an iterative and incremental life cycle Vs an adaptive life cycle that they could share so that there is a very clear distinction in my mind between the two?
Bala S DuvvuriProject Manager| ShellBangalore, Karnataka, India
Dec 28, 2015 3:36 PM
Replying to Jonathan Doyle
...
Thanks, Bala. Those are useful links.
You are welcome Jonathan and I wish you a very happy new year in advance.
...
1 reply by Jonathan Doyle
Jan 01, 2016 1:29 PM
Jonathan Doyle
...
Thanks Bala. Happy New Year to you too.
Saving Changes...
Steven ZacharyDirector| Alberta Health ServicesCalgary, Alberta, Canada
Dec 28, 2015 10:10 AM
Replying to Sergio Luis Conte
...
Things to take into account: 1-agile is not software related only. 2-agile must not be tied to a life cycle. You can apply agile in predictive life cycles. As you mentioned (and as the PMBOK said) adaptative life cycles are iterative/incremental life cycles. The key element in the adaptative is that the iterations/increments are decided by the requirements you have on-hand. In interative/incremental life cycles the iterations/increments are defined in advance for other type of factors like time-to-market, project risk, cultural environment, type of product, etc.
Great description Sergio. To add to that, i'd say the names speak volumes., Adaptive is in a sense reactive and relies on feedback. Iterative is similar, in some senses, but looks to size up the work slightly differently. Saving Changes...
Steven ZacharyDirector| Alberta Health ServicesCalgary, Alberta, Canada
Dec 28, 2015 1:20 PM
Replying to Rami Kaibni
...
Jonathan,
Plan-Driven Projects have Predictive Life Cycles (Waterfall or Traditional): These require scope, schedule and cost to be determined in details early in the project before beginning the work.
Change-Driven Projects have Adaptive (Agile), Incremental or Iterative Life Cycles: They have varying levels of early planning. Iterative and Incremental Life Cycles involve early planning of high-level scope sufficient to allow for initial estimates while Adaptive involves fixed time and costs, and scope is broadly defined.
The difference between Incremental and Iterative is the following:
Incremental: Delivers a complete, usable portion of the product for each iteration.
Iterative: The complete concept is built in successive levels if details to create the end result.
You can find a detailed explanation for these in Rita Malcahy's Book. (PMP Exam Prep).
Excellent note Rami, it's a slight but very important difference.
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten AssociatesNew Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Dec 30, 2015 1:54 AM
Replying to Steven Zachary
...
Excellent note Rami, it's a slight but very important difference.
Thanks Steven - Very True. Saving Changes...
Steven ZacharyDirector| Alberta Health ServicesCalgary, Alberta, Canada
Dec 28, 2015 5:12 PM
Replying to Sergio Luis Conte
...
In my career (including right now) we have more than one project life cycle defined and we select to use one or another depending multiple selection criteria where one of the principal are the organization culture, type of product to create, and external environmental factors.
These are all very common circumstances that i've seen in my experiences as well. It's rare for a large organization to be a one methodology shop. I have seen concentration in much smaller firms which are taking advantage of their nimbleness.
...
1 reply by Rami Kaibni
Dec 30, 2015 1:40 PM
Rami Kaibni
...
I agree, some projects can be a combination of both (Adaptive and Predictive)
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten AssociatesNew Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Dec 30, 2015 12:47 PM
Replying to Steven Zachary
...
These are all very common circumstances that i've seen in my experiences as well. It's rare for a large organization to be a one methodology shop. I have seen concentration in much smaller firms which are taking advantage of their nimbleness.
I agree, some projects can be a combination of both (Adaptive and Predictive) Saving Changes...
Jonathan DoylePM Consultant| Adduco Consultancy LtdLondon, United Kingdom
Dec 29, 2015 8:58 PM
Replying to Bala S Duvvuri
...
You are welcome Jonathan and I wish you a very happy new year in advance.
Thanks Bala. Happy New Year to you too. Saving Changes...