Project Management Central
Please login or join to subscribe to this thread
|
|||
|
|||
Winnie Liem
Senior Manager Business Experience Practice| Government of Ontario
Markham, Ontario, Canada
Hi James, Interesting that there is little response on your question :), so I felt compelled to tell you some of my thoughts on the subject.
I believe that the problem lies in the fact that PMs classically are not the ones who tackle the "operational" or "service mgt" realm of practice, but usually skirt along the side of Project Mgt that deals with new endeavours that require lots of upfront planning. In the area od DR, we hope that the planning has occurred and that you are merely implementing the plan that was devised in such incidents (ie. flooding). I happen to work in IT Service Mgt currently and find that Project Mgt is not the at the forefront of thinking. On my team are persons that handle disaster recovery and continuity of operations and we deal with vendors that are the leading edge providers of DR. I would think in the vendor community there are some key players who own the best practices for handling DR projects (can find out who these are if you write me directly :). As well, I think the role of the PM is best served in developing the Risk Analysis Matrices around protecting the most vulnerable resources. In the Government that I work in, we certainly pay heed to and rate the level of risk and ensure our stakeholders are aware of all risk scenarios and the consequences, so that the right plan is in place when/if that risk occurs and ensuring proper risk acceptance. I would think that working in DR should also yield many valuable PM lessons learned that need to be published or communicated to key govt officials on how these can be prevented or severity be lessened. My humble opinions... |
Please login or join to reply
ADVERTISEMENTS
I've never heard of a relationship being affected by punctuation. - Jerry Seinfeld |