Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Are projects normally one phase or more?

linkedin twitter facebook   Governance   Organizational Project Management   PMO   Using PMI Standards  
avatar
Anonymous
This topic is generated from another discussion but we want to separate the topics.

Are projects normally consist of one phase only or most (if not all) projects should have more than one phase?

Maybe another point to add here - what does a project phase mean to you?
Sort By:
avatar
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
I've worked overseas including the gulf region for many years with an International Company called CCC which you might be familiar with. I was deployed on mega jobs where sometimes the project was on phases, sometimes it was one phase. It all depends on the size pf the project, complexity, company's management skills and resources.

From construction point of view, phases can have two approaches:

1- Mobilization, Design, Planning, Procurement, Construction, Pre-Commisioning .....

2- In Oil and Gas projects, some gas trains might be constructed as Phase I and the rest left for Phase II development.
avatar
Stéphane Parent Self Employed / Semi-retired| Leader Maker Prince Edward Island, Canada
To me a phase is the lowest level of a project breakdown structure (PBS). Each phase is a project in its own right: initiation, planning, execution, control and closure.

Put another way, a phase should contain the smallest amount of scope that can be be delivered and still provide value.

Last summer, I delivered a first phase towards a client's overall enterprise data governance project. The first phase was meant to define the scope of enterprise data governance and delivered a business case, a proposal, and a proposed implementation approach. The phase was treated like a project in its own right. All three deliverables were needed to provide value to the client.
avatar
Eric Lamy Senior Project Manager| Keurig Green Mountain Newbury, Ma, United States
In my experience, even the smallest projects worthy of being called such have some level of phasing. Those phases don't necessarily follow a set structure, however, so the concept is something of an abstraction and must be defined either on a case by case basis, or within some broader hierarchy.
avatar
Anonymous
Jan 25, 2016 12:53 PM
Replying to Rami Kaibni
...
I've worked overseas including the gulf region for many years with an International Company called CCC which you might be familiar with. I was deployed on mega jobs where sometimes the project was on phases, sometimes it was one phase. It all depends on the size pf the project, complexity, company's management skills and resources.

From construction point of view, phases can have two approaches:

1- Mobilization, Design, Planning, Procurement, Construction, Pre-Commisioning .....

2- In Oil and Gas projects, some gas trains might be constructed as Phase I and the rest left for Phase II development.
Rami

I know CCC well.

What you are talking about is a different type of phasing. You are you talking about when a company breakdown the implementation of a project into parts (called phases). Like phase 1 will be Tower 1 and 2; Phase 2 will be tower 3, 4, and 5. Sometimes, these "phases" might even be funded separately (as semi-independent projects). In this case, what we have is a program with multiple projects.

The other type of a phase is when the project life cycle is broken down into phases - usually sequential with some overlap - and each phase has a purpose - an output that we need for the next phase.
...
1 reply by Rami Kaibni
Jan 26, 2016 3:19 AM
Rami Kaibni
...
You are correct Mounir - This is exactly what I meant when I explained that there are two approaches for phasing.

Approach 1 is the phasing you explained in your second paragraph.
Approach 2 is the phasing explained in your first paragraph.

This is as far as I understood the question unless I overlooked something.
avatar
Anonymous
Jan 25, 2016 7:58 PM
Replying to Eric Lamy
...
In my experience, even the smallest projects worthy of being called such have some level of phasing. Those phases don't necessarily follow a set structure, however, so the concept is something of an abstraction and must be defined either on a case by case basis, or within some broader hierarchy.
Agree
avatar
Paolo Cornali Project Manager| HTA srl Brescia, Lombardia, Italy
In my company a project can be divided in the following sub-phases: feasibility, planning, design, review, prototyping, verification, construction, validation.
Moreover each phase have its initiation, planning, execution, control and closing procedures.
avatar
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
You are correct Mounir - This is exactly what I meant when I explained that there are two approaches for phasing.

Approach 1 is the phasing you explained in your second paragraph.
Approach 2 is the phasing explained in your first paragraph.

This is as far as I understood the question unless I overlooked something.
avatar
Amir Hamza Pakistan
How many Phase a project consist of???

Its depend upon the type/nature of project and the financial capability of an organization.

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"I do not know anyone who has got to the top without hard work. That is the recipe. It will not always get you to the top, but should get you pretty near."

- Margaret Thatcher

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors