Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

How does a PM strategist introduce PM discipline in a purely functional organization?

linkedin twitter facebook   Change Management   Government   Leadership  
avatar
Thomas Cooper PMP, CSPO| State of Tennessee Department of Health Care Finance and Adminstration PMO Nashville, Tn, United States
The cultural behavior of my organization is the legacy of a municipal management structure. The State has tried to shake up this system with pay for performance compensation structures and there are some positive developments. Change is slow and the ideology remains vertical with roles and communications lines firmly defined in org groups.
How does a functioning PM introduce the role of the flexible project manager without threatening the functioning groups?
Sort By:
avatar
Sergio Luis Conte Helping to create solutions for everyone| Worldwide based Organizations Buenos Aires, Argentina
No problem with that. Because project management is about to integrate all needed functions to achieve the project objectives. I worked for the goverment too. As in other type of things, no pain no gain. Remember to every stakeholder the pain to make things in deintegrated form.
avatar
Eduard Hernandez
Community Champion
Product Operations Program Manager Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain
The role of functional manager is to coordinate with the PM the allocation of project resources. PM soft skills are essential to ensure that neither the functional manager nor the resource/s feel neglected or overruled.
avatar
Scott Sale Program Manager| Kindred Louisville, Ky, United States
My previous experience has taught me this is a slow process if you are internal employee. The key is to be a "change agent" for the PM process and finding the right Sponsor for the process to help you drive the change is key. Having developed a PMO for Government and what we will call a "legacy" company you will have to work through and overcome the 4 areas below.

- Bureaucracy
- Control
- Autonomy
- Leadership

The variance of influence will depend on your reporting structure and this will give you the rate of speed of change.
avatar
Stéphane Parent Self Employed / Semi-retired| Leader Maker Prince Edward Island, Canada
A lot of the knowledge areas would already be handled by specific organizational function. You should focus on those areas that are net new and, thus, add value. Integration and stakeholder management are good example. If Finance doesn't already do risk management, you can also add that one.
...
1 reply by Thomas Cooper
Aug 01, 2016 11:41 AM
Thomas Cooper
...
Stephane,
Thank you for insight. I am currently developing our risk reporting for a new vendor relationship. The opportunity is ripe.
Tom
avatar
Thomas Cooper PMP, CSPO| State of Tennessee Department of Health Care Finance and Adminstration PMO Nashville, Tn, United States
Aug 01, 2016 9:21 AM
Replying to Stéphane Parent
...
A lot of the knowledge areas would already be handled by specific organizational function. You should focus on those areas that are net new and, thus, add value. Integration and stakeholder management are good example. If Finance doesn't already do risk management, you can also add that one.
Stephane,
Thank you for insight. I am currently developing our risk reporting for a new vendor relationship. The opportunity is ripe.
Tom
avatar
VENKATARAJ C KODANDARAMU SAP Digital Transformation Logistics Lead| NTT DATA Inc, USA Chintamani, Karnataka, India
In my experience is: In a Functional Organization,there is a significantly high misconception : a Project Manager also must play a role of Process Owner and hence expectation somehow bottoms down that PM's must act as a strong Change Managers/Agent within that functional organization :-)
avatar
Stéphane Parent Self Employed / Semi-retired| Leader Maker Prince Edward Island, Canada
As professionals, Venkataraj, we must not only deliver on the project but also act as process/change catalysts.
avatar
VENKATARAJ C KODANDARAMU SAP Digital Transformation Logistics Lead| NTT DATA Inc, USA Chintamani, Karnataka, India
I fully agree with you Stephane, but for me it looks like there is a difference between acting as change/process catalysts and precisely process owners !
avatar
Tim PM Project Manager| NHS Yes, United Kingdom
Hi Venkataraj, yes there is a difference- one is managing projects while the other is leading them, sometimes they are the same person, but not always! Looking at the original question, I would also investigate further the "pay for performance compensation structures", to see if the project can be shaped to help people achieve their targets for those, doing that does very much increase stakeholder enthusiasm.
avatar
Thomas Cooper PMP, CSPO| State of Tennessee Department of Health Care Finance and Adminstration PMO Nashville, Tn, United States
Great contributions! I think the delicateness of the role is high in functional organizations. The challenge is to be a 'non threatening' change catalyst and willing project owner. Each organization is unique. The size of the functional group is also a big factor in the challenge.

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"There are two types of people in this world, good and bad. The good sleep better, but the bad seem to enjoy the waking hours much more."

- Woody Allen

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors