Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Dealing with micro managers

linkedin twitter facebook   Career Development   Leadership   New Practitioners  
avatar
Anupam India
There are bosses who suspects & doubt their employee to do the job right, monitors that is least important & keep checking status hourly/daily, demotivates and discourages from taking decision, focus on bogus priorities than deliverable, asks for approvals & permission for non-project related activities, etc.

Do you see these bosses as a leader? What strategy will you suggest for dealing with such bosses?
Sort By:
< 1 2 3 >
avatar
Eduard Hernandez
Community Champion
Product Operations Program Manager Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain
Add my two cents to all great contributions so far:

One of the risks of micromanagement is the negative influence on team members, who might feel undervalued and therefore become less motivated towards achieving project goals.
...
1 reply by Anupam
Nov 14, 2016 11:58 AM
Anupam
...
Thanks Eduard. I agree.
avatar
Stéphane Parent Self Employed / Semi-retired| Leader Maker Prince Edward Island, Canada
Nov 13, 2016 11:10 PM
Replying to Anupam
...
Thanks Stéphane

I agree on changing 'yourself', but will there be enough trust, respect, cordial relation & motivation?

While a true leader places the team victory above personal ego & glory there are leaders who are just opposite. What example a leader is setting for the team? Personally I feel this is not good for the team.

Like I mentioned, there are two options for the team - either live with it or quit. Both of these are not good for the project, team & organization.
It goes back to learning from everyone around you. Sometimes we learn what NOT to do.
avatar
Anupam India
Nov 13, 2016 11:38 PM
Replying to Javier zumaya
...
I think micromanagement bosses/practice is a result, not an habit or tool for people with a total ignorance of the add-value activities of the organization. Every activity or action add value for them, everything is important, urgent, and risky. You only can give the right information and guide the boss (as much as you can) for the safe path. Its an incredible waste of time try to manage a project with this behaviour in the organization.
Thanks Javier
avatar
Anupam India
Nov 14, 2016 7:03 AM
Replying to Eduard Hernandez
...
Add my two cents to all great contributions so far:

One of the risks of micromanagement is the negative influence on team members, who might feel undervalued and therefore become less motivated towards achieving project goals.
Thanks Eduard. I agree.
avatar
Mayte Mata Sivera PMO Leader | Speaker | Author Ut, United States
Nov 11, 2016 10:36 PM
Replying to Rami Kaibni
...
Anupam,

There are lots of Micro-Managers these days and of course in my point of view, those can't be classified as leaders.

For the strategy of dealing with micro-managers, efftects and tools, please refer to my article (Micro-Management: A trip to failure):

http://www.projectmanagement.com/articles/...Trip-to-Failure

Hope you find it useful.
Yes, sure! I remember that I've read a great article, but I completely forget that was yours.
...
1 reply by Rami Kaibni
Nov 14, 2016 2:15 PM
Rami Kaibni
...
Thanks Maria - Now you can remember :-)
avatar
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Nov 14, 2016 1:45 PM
Replying to Mayte Mata Sivera
...
Yes, sure! I remember that I've read a great article, but I completely forget that was yours.
Thanks Maria - Now you can remember :-)
avatar
Adrian Carlogea Australia
I am not sure what micromanagement really means. Can you please hep me with this?

I thought micromanagement is when a superior tells you how to do you job. In order to micromanage someone, in my opinion, it is crucial for the "micro-manager" to be from the same line of work as the employee that is being micromanaged. If this is not true then the micro-manager can't tell the employee how to do his/her job so he can't micromanage.

Setting the priorities for an employee and frequently asking for status report in my opinion is not really micromanagement unless you give to the employee concrete instructions on how to complete the assigned tasks.

In conclusion I think there is very limited potential for project managers to micromanage their project team members.

For instance a software project managers that is setting up the priorities for a software developer and frequently asks him/her for status report is not micromanaging as long as the developer has complete freedom on choosing the technical solution to be used for the completion of the tasks. In many cases the developers are not the best people to set priorities since they may have little or no direct interaction with the customer so the PM may be much better suited for this job.

If the developer is not allowed to do whatever he/she wants to complete his/her assigned work but a more senior developer or a technical manager tells him/her how to complete the tasks then we can really talk about micromanagement.

I think that entry level workers should always be micromanaged until they are able to work without supervision.

What do you think? I am right or not?
< 1 2 3 >

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"Very deep. You should send that into Reader's Digest, they've got a page for people like you."

- Douglas Adams

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors