Stéphane ParentSelf Employed / Semi-retired| Leader MakerPrince Edward Island, Canada
Dec 15, 2016 6:08 AM
Replying to Markus Kopko
...
Hello Stephane,
i am sorry for producing this irritation. It was cause of the limited editing functions within the discussion board.
Like you can see now in the online version these are two different branches in the map (cause i did not want to create a single discussion thread only for the milestone branch).
And you are right about the approval process in general. This was meant as a specific approval process only for the deliverable here.
But i do also thinking about to take this off the map, what do you and of course the others also think about?
Regards,
Markus
My suggestion, Markus, would be to replace the approval process with the approval/escalation organizational chain. Basically, indicate who - or at least, what role - approves what, from most to least authority.
...
1 reply by Markus Kopko
Dec 19, 2016 6:17 AM
Markus Kopko
...
Hi Stephane,
thanks for the comment. In companion to what Thilo has posted after your comment i would agree that this approval/escalation process you are talking about ( i do assume you are talking about the process for the project in general, right?) will be covered at another place.
This one here was meant only for the approval of this single deliverable( result of the BC analysis/review).
But meanwhile i am on the same track like Thilo and tend to rely on the pure content based approach.
This will mean i will take of this branch from the bc map at this point.
Thanks for contributing again.
Regards,
Markus
Saving Changes...
Thilo WackHead of Existing Product and Test Lab| optimedTholey-Hasborn, Germany
Hi Markus,
typically both the approval as well as the escalation process would be covered elsewhere. I don't think this belongs to the business case as a basis for decision making. If, for any reason, there are no other project initialization documents which would cover this, or if for certain projects there is a need to deviate from the usual process the business case could be used for this purpose for the simple and practical reason that it is typically signed off by exactly the same people who would need to know about or approve such things...
Of course people later on can use the maps and adapt them to their organizational needs and processes by just combining branches as needed, but for now I'd follow a pure content based approach...
...
1 reply by Markus Kopko
Dec 19, 2016 6:18 AM
Markus Kopko
...
agree ;)
Saving Changes...
Markus KopkoAI Enabler for Project & Program Mgmt | Founder PMotion.ai / The PM
AI Coach| PMotion.aiHamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Dec 16, 2016 1:11 PM
Replying to Stéphane Parent
...
My suggestion, Markus, would be to replace the approval process with the approval/escalation organizational chain. Basically, indicate who - or at least, what role - approves what, from most to least authority.
Hi Stephane,
thanks for the comment. In companion to what Thilo has posted after your comment i would agree that this approval/escalation process you are talking about ( i do assume you are talking about the process for the project in general, right?) will be covered at another place.
This one here was meant only for the approval of this single deliverable( result of the BC analysis/review).
But meanwhile i am on the same track like Thilo and tend to rely on the pure content based approach.
This will mean i will take of this branch from the bc map at this point.
Thanks for contributing again.
Regards,
Markus Saving Changes...
Markus KopkoAI Enabler for Project & Program Mgmt | Founder PMotion.ai / The PM
AI Coach| PMotion.aiHamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Dec 18, 2016 8:21 AM
Replying to Thilo Wack
...
Hi Markus,
typically both the approval as well as the escalation process would be covered elsewhere. I don't think this belongs to the business case as a basis for decision making. If, for any reason, there are no other project initialization documents which would cover this, or if for certain projects there is a need to deviate from the usual process the business case could be used for this purpose for the simple and practical reason that it is typically signed off by exactly the same people who would need to know about or approve such things...
Of course people later on can use the maps and adapt them to their organizational needs and processes by just combining branches as needed, but for now I'd follow a pure content based approach...
agree ;) Saving Changes...
Markus KopkoAI Enabler for Project & Program Mgmt | Founder PMotion.ai / The PM
AI Coach| PMotion.aiHamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Version 1.0 of the "review business case" map is now ready to download!
You can access an interactive online version of the “Knowing your Sponsor” map here (or just by clicking on the picture above):