Simon LangeProgram Manager| NSW HealthNorth Strathfield, Nsw, Australia
When working on a project, conflict can arise from many different sources. The challenge of implementing a change, understanding and translating stakeholder requirements into a result they want, or dealing with organisational politics, all creates ripe conditions for conflict. Indeed, people working together can create tension.
How do you respond to conflict, if it arises in your project environments? What do you do to keep the project on track? Saving Changes...
Simon LangeProgram Manager| NSW HealthNorth Strathfield, Nsw, Australia
Feb 25, 2017 11:33 AM
Replying to Diego Escobar
...
I think one of the best ways to foresee conflict is a good knowledge of stakeholders.
And for resolve conflict keep in mind to separate people from problems an real interests from personal positions.
Hi Diego,
Thanks for contributing to this discussion.
I agree, a good understanding of your stakeholders will allow you to anticipate conflict, and sometimes address the cause before it escalates.
How do you maintain a distinction between people and problems, especially when the problems may be linked or caused by people?
For me, I see the value in staying out of the details of the conflict, and I think that is what you mean by separating "real interests from personal positions." Saving Changes...
Simon LangeProgram Manager| NSW HealthNorth Strathfield, Nsw, Australia
Feb 24, 2017 5:51 AM
Replying to Eric Simms
...
Generally, I weigh all conflict against the question "What position would most advance the project's interests?", then I act accordingly. I feel this gives me the 'moral authority' to make difficult choices, especially when resolving conflict between individuals. Also, viewing conflict in this light usually removes it from the realms of subjectivity and personal interest, and makes the most beneficial path apparent.
Hi Eric,
You bring up a great point, and I think the answer to this question is really critical. Especially when there are multiple valid points of view, the ability to rationalise your strategy based on project objectives provides a clear path to make decisions and address conflict.
However, in my experience, project objectives sometimes flex and stretch based on stakeholders perspective. So while I agree that conflict can be addressed by leveraging from an objective position (in this case project interests), if I seek high moral ground, I'm concerned that I may alienate rather than build an alliance. Is this something that you have experienced while using this approach?
For me, I'd be looking to unite stakeholders underneath an objective position, and then use the common ground to deliver project objectives. That way we build an alliance as a foundation to project delivery.
...
1 reply by Chandrashekhar Thatte
Feb 27, 2017 12:52 AM
Chandrashekhar Thatte
...
I agree with you Simon,the conflicts may be due to personal ego/preferences or clash of project interest/objectives.Both need to be addressed in a time bound manner.One way to attempt early resolution would be initially to have a patient hearing on one to one (close door) basis to understand the core issue involved and resolved after an in depth exchange of views with some give and take flexible attitude and if this attempt doesn't succeed then the matter may be thrown open to discussion with the concerned stakeholders to find the solution in a collaborative spirit.Building an alliance is essential for project delivery.
You bring up a great point, and I think the answer to this question is really critical. Especially when there are multiple valid points of view, the ability to rationalise your strategy based on project objectives provides a clear path to make decisions and address conflict.
However, in my experience, project objectives sometimes flex and stretch based on stakeholders perspective. So while I agree that conflict can be addressed by leveraging from an objective position (in this case project interests), if I seek high moral ground, I'm concerned that I may alienate rather than build an alliance. Is this something that you have experienced while using this approach?
For me, I'd be looking to unite stakeholders underneath an objective position, and then use the common ground to deliver project objectives. That way we build an alliance as a foundation to project delivery.
I agree with you Simon,the conflicts may be due to personal ego/preferences or clash of project interest/objectives.Both need to be addressed in a time bound manner.One way to attempt early resolution would be initially to have a patient hearing on one to one (close door) basis to understand the core issue involved and resolved after an in depth exchange of views with some give and take flexible attitude and if this attempt doesn't succeed then the matter may be thrown open to discussion with the concerned stakeholders to find the solution in a collaborative spirit.Building an alliance is essential for project delivery. Saving Changes...
Anonymous
Only the answer is "Communicate". Yes, you can tackle all conflict, if you come up with facts and figures. It is the best way to deal. Saving Changes...
Diego EscobarSr. Project Manager - CALA Region| TCRP S.A.Buenos Aires, Capital Federal, Argentina
Hi Simon,
Regarding the difference between people and problems, what I mean is that when there is a conflict there is always people involved, but who is to say that pro people IS the problem?
Sometimes we tend to believe that one particular person is the problem when he/she puts him/herself in a position like saying "I want to do this!" and not going deeper into the real interest like "I think we should do this because it will benefit ...."
When we are capable to get people talk about the real interest, we begin to work in a good negotiation environment, where real win-win solutions may arrive.
Sometimes people find that all have the same interest, when they leave personal positions behind.
I hope it help to clarify my point. Saving Changes...