Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Risk reports in the progress report from sub contractor?

linkedin twitter facebook   Construction   Legal Project Management   Risk Management  
avatar
Vincent Guerard Coach - Trainer - Speaker - Advisor| Freelance Mont-Royal, Quebec, Canada
In your opinion requiring a detail risk report to be include in progress report would have more positive side or negative.

What is your experience?
Why is it that way in your projects?
Sort By:
avatar
Vincent Guerard Coach - Trainer - Speaker - Advisor| Freelance Mont-Royal, Quebec, Canada
I was told a some point that it would increase risk of claim from sub contractor if we request that they provide detail risk report!
avatar
Mark Eckman Senior Project Manager, PMP| Veolia Emporia, Va, United States
Good question Vincent.

In most of the projects I have managed, I have included risk status reports in my project status/progress reports. Usually the level of detail that I include has been determined by two things: 1) Data that my stakeholders need or want; 2) The nature of the active risks that I am reporting on at a given phase in the project.

Overall, I definitely feel that reporting the appropriate level of detail in a risk summary or status report is crucial to keeping all team members focus engaged and absolutely has a positive impact.
avatar
Mark Eckman Senior Project Manager, PMP| Veolia Emporia, Va, United States
Misunderstood your question, which makes this an even better question.

I have had sub-contractors provide a risk detail summary/report in the past. Have not ever had negative repercussions directly, but that is not to say that I did not unintentionally put a project at risk for a negative event.

My question now is how, specifically, does this requirement request increase the risk of claim from sub-contractor?
avatar
Vincent Guerard Coach - Trainer - Speaker - Advisor| Freelance Mont-Royal, Quebec, Canada
Thank you for both reply Mark.

I don't think it increases risk of claim in the contrary. But that was the unsubstantiated argument I got. I hope in some answers here we will get some kind of explanation.
avatar
Stéphane Parent Self Employed / Semi-retired| Leader Maker Prince Edward Island, Canada
I suspect someone thinks that if you let the people on your team raise risks, they can then use them to substantiate delays or poor performance.

I don't believe there is anything inherently wrong in letting team members, whether contractors or not, provide additional risk information. As project manager, you get to decide what the information tells you and what you should do with it.
avatar
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
I totally agree with Mark's & Stephane's feedback. Both answers combined works perfectly in my opinion.
avatar
Vincent Guerard Coach - Trainer - Speaker - Advisor| Freelance Mont-Royal, Quebec, Canada
Thank for your input I agree

Naming risk don't make them become reality

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"Oh, life is a glorious cycle of song, A medley of extemporanea; And love is a thing that can never go wrong; and I am Marie of Roumania."

- Dorothy Parker

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors