Sisca YuliharyaniSr. PM Consultant | Chief Strategy Officer| IndonesiaBandung, West Java, Indonesia
How do you deal with one of your project member that not cooperative? The project is on going and you have been assigned as PM in the middle of the project (so you didn’t choose him/her, you just accept). This member is very difficult people and destroy the other team morale. But you can’t just get the rid of he/she because it will impact the project schedule and cost. Saving Changes...
ANEMU SIVARAMAKRISHNAManaging Director| Vision Engineers and SurveyorsSrikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India
Depending upon the type of person and his/her involvement in the project you have to handle. The level of treatment as follows
Stage 1: Analysis the situation try to explain this guy what's wrong in his thinking and correct his thinking. Give him high priority and try to talk and correct in every level. If he is changed your project will succeed.
Stage 2: Give some task and ask him to complete. Praise him little more than required and give the next task. At some point he enjoy the achievement and try to support you.
Stage 3: The next level treatment is to isolate him. Don't give any task. Just be like that for some time ask him take a holiday try to get things in your control.
In most of the cases micromanagement will work. Try to observe him closely and try to control every step.
...
1 reply by Sisca Yuliharyani
May 28, 2017 9:20 PM
Sisca Yuliharyani
...
Hi Anemu,
I agree with your stages, In this project, i still working on the initiation of stage 3 (i did stage 1 and 2 in months but there weren't any significant result, and i must move to stage 3 ASAP because of the tight schedule)
Thanks for your insight...
Saving Changes...
Sisca YuliharyaniSr. PM Consultant | Chief Strategy Officer| IndonesiaBandung, West Java, Indonesia
May 26, 2017 7:45 AM
Replying to John Tieso
...
Sisca, I might suggest that you do not have an 'uncooperative' team member, you have an 'inexperienced' team member. As I see it, you have three options here; (1) let HR know this person is not qualified, and you need a replacement, (2) work with the team member to provide them some on-the-job training, if possible, to make them ore productive, or (3) pair them with someone who can help them gain exposure and experience. Depending on the situation and or all of the three might be possible solutions.
Dear John,
Yes, i have inexperienced and also uncooperative team member (this person really uncooperative in executing the tasks, and his/her behavior made other team members difficult to execute their tasks because of his/her attitude). I am now working on how to make this person be more cooperative, at least so that others can uncover the "hidden" issue because of his/her inexperience in this field.
1. I told the HR about this issue and ask for new resource not for this project, but i think i might need in future project (some projects will be start soon, and i have to prepare good resource for this)
2. The training is impossible, since the schedule is very tight for this project (but this is possible before he/she assigned to other projects)
3. Yes, now i am doing like this advice (but the purpose is so that me, my team member and the project aren't so rely on him/her)
Thanks for your thought, i really appreciate it... Saving Changes...
Sisca YuliharyaniSr. PM Consultant | Chief Strategy Officer| IndonesiaBandung, West Java, Indonesia
May 27, 2017 3:40 AM
Replying to Adrian Carlogea
...
Hi John
I agree that in this case we don't have lack of cooperation but lack of experience. Still I don't find a good idea to train the team member during the project as the training could take long time and the dead-line could be missed by a long period of time.
In my opinion inexperienced employees should only work on projects as long as there are enough experienced team members capable of completing the project without them. Some inexperienced team members may find out during the project that they don't like the job so they will switch to something else without ever getting the required experience.
In addition, unless he/she is also a good technical expert, I don't think training employees is or should be the responsibility of the PM. Training employees is basically the responsibility of functional managers.
In this case I can't think at another solution than trying to get a more experienced team member on board. This should also be the responsibility of the functional manager but as far as I understood from Sisca, the functional manager in this case said that he could not help.
Dear Adrian,
I agree that in this case we don't have lack of cooperation but lack of experience. Still I don't find a good idea to train the team member during the project as the training could take long time and the dead-line could be missed by a long period of time. --)) I have team member that lack of cooperation (and that happen not just because of his/her lack of experience, but also because of his/her attitude). In this case, i agree that training will impact the schedule.
In my opinion inexperienced employees should only work on projects as long as there are enough experienced team members capable of completing the project without them. Some inexperienced team members may find out during the project that they don't like the job so they will switch to something else without ever getting the required experience. In addition, unless he/she is also a good technical expert, I don't think training employees is or should be the responsibility of the PM. Training employees is basically the responsibility of functional managers. --)) Agreed
Thanks for your thought, really appreciate it.. Saving Changes...
Sisca YuliharyaniSr. PM Consultant | Chief Strategy Officer| IndonesiaBandung, West Java, Indonesia
May 27, 2017 12:30 PM
Replying to ANEMU SIVARAMAKRISHNA
...
Depending upon the type of person and his/her involvement in the project you have to handle. The level of treatment as follows
Stage 1: Analysis the situation try to explain this guy what's wrong in his thinking and correct his thinking. Give him high priority and try to talk and correct in every level. If he is changed your project will succeed.
Stage 2: Give some task and ask him to complete. Praise him little more than required and give the next task. At some point he enjoy the achievement and try to support you.
Stage 3: The next level treatment is to isolate him. Don't give any task. Just be like that for some time ask him take a holiday try to get things in your control.
In most of the cases micromanagement will work. Try to observe him closely and try to control every step.
Hi Anemu,
I agree with your stages, In this project, i still working on the initiation of stage 3 (i did stage 1 and 2 in months but there weren't any significant result, and i must move to stage 3 ASAP because of the tight schedule)
Thanks for your insight... Saving Changes...
John TiesoAuthor, Lecturer in Business Management| The Catholic University of America, Busch School of Business & EconomicsArlington, Va, United States
As we discuss it, the appearance is there that Sisca has gone through some reasonable steps, and tried to work with the team member. Now, it is time for HR to step up (?step in) to help resolve this. Saving Changes...
I agree with John. At this point you do need to get HR and the direct line manager to get involved. By not taking any action they are endangering the progress of the project and the ability of the team to formatively do their assigned tasks.
You may also need to have documented your steps in getting to the point of going to HR. Without that documentation you may find yourself starting at square one to develop the documentation. In a project where you possibly see yourself not being able to resolve the issues, especially where it is truly lack of experience with a side order of bad attitude then providing a set of documentation of on-going efforts to resolve the situation is necessary.
...
2 replies by Sisca Yuliharyani and Susan Reilly
May 30, 2017 10:25 PM
Sisca Yuliharyani
...
Dear John and Susan,
Thanks for your advice. I will arrange the documentation about this. Really appreciate it :)
May 31, 2017 7:45 AM
Susan Reilly
...
Sisca, I do feel for you. I have had to make this decision more than once in my career and that part of it doesn't get any easier because there is emotion involved. As a PM we don't want to be seen as over reactive complainers who can't deal with our teams because that is what we trade on, persuading people to do their work without having direct authority. At some point which is different for each time you do run into to those situations you have to make a tough choice; the welfare of the project and the team, and your sanity or the flip side of dealing with the consequences of not having the person removed.
Best of Luck on this one.
Saving Changes...
Sisca YuliharyaniSr. PM Consultant | Chief Strategy Officer| IndonesiaBandung, West Java, Indonesia
May 30, 2017 9:00 AM
Replying to Susan Reilly
...
I agree with John. At this point you do need to get HR and the direct line manager to get involved. By not taking any action they are endangering the progress of the project and the ability of the team to formatively do their assigned tasks.
You may also need to have documented your steps in getting to the point of going to HR. Without that documentation you may find yourself starting at square one to develop the documentation. In a project where you possibly see yourself not being able to resolve the issues, especially where it is truly lack of experience with a side order of bad attitude then providing a set of documentation of on-going efforts to resolve the situation is necessary.
Dear John and Susan,
Thanks for your advice. I will arrange the documentation about this. Really appreciate it :) Saving Changes...
I agree with John. At this point you do need to get HR and the direct line manager to get involved. By not taking any action they are endangering the progress of the project and the ability of the team to formatively do their assigned tasks.
You may also need to have documented your steps in getting to the point of going to HR. Without that documentation you may find yourself starting at square one to develop the documentation. In a project where you possibly see yourself not being able to resolve the issues, especially where it is truly lack of experience with a side order of bad attitude then providing a set of documentation of on-going efforts to resolve the situation is necessary.
Sisca, I do feel for you. I have had to make this decision more than once in my career and that part of it doesn't get any easier because there is emotion involved. As a PM we don't want to be seen as over reactive complainers who can't deal with our teams because that is what we trade on, persuading people to do their work without having direct authority. At some point which is different for each time you do run into to those situations you have to make a tough choice; the welfare of the project and the team, and your sanity or the flip side of dealing with the consequences of not having the person removed.
Best of Luck on this one.
...
1 reply by Sisca Yuliharyani
Jun 01, 2017 8:04 PM
Sisca Yuliharyani
...
Dear Susan,
Thank you very much for your reply, really appreciate it :)
I would be very, very, very careful before complaining to HR and management about an employee as the complain can very easily backfire.
No matter how many documentation you gather the employee can defend himself and can convince the line manager that he has done his best on the project.
Also the line manager may feel insulted by the complain as he is responsible for the employee. If the line manager considers that his employees has done a good job on the project then you risk putting yourself in a vary bad situation.
You need to remember that the functional managers with their employees are actually delivering the projects and if you are in a bad relation with a functional manager this is not good at all.
If your complain fails you may find yourself removed from the project.
The best way to avoid such unpleasant situations is to make the functional managers responsible for the project, in their area of expertise. The project managers are not the team members bosses the functional managers are so they have to supervise their employees all the time even when they are working on projects. This way the functional managers would be motivated to ensure their employees are doing a good job on the project. It is up to the management of the company to make the functional managers responsible for projects outcomes.
I am not saying that you should not proceed with your complain I am saying that you should consider this the last (desperate) attempt to resolve the problem. Ideally you should establish good relationships with management because nobody likes complains.
Good Luck!
...
1 reply by Sisca Yuliharyani
Jun 01, 2017 8:02 PM
Sisca Yuliharyani
...
Dear Adrian,
Thank you for your insight, i also consider about this issue. And you're right about line manager that he is not so involve in this project from the very first time, i will be careful about my technique to resolve this issue :)