Project Management

Work, Recreation, and Full Engagement

From the Strategic Project Management Blog
by
As an "accidental" project manager, it's very satisfying to contribute to the project management community online with anecdotes and stories I've picked up from my own experience. I hope you enjoy our daily conversation.

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

Tell Me You're Going to Get This Done

Quiting Isn't Easy if You Never Do It

Getting in the Way of Peak Performance

The Agony of Defeat?

Nobody Likes Being the Heavy

Categories

decision-making, empowering team members, project leadership, project management, project management fundamentals, project success, project teams, struggling projects, work management

Date

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  


In his book Shop Class as Soulcraft, Matthew Crawford cites a classic psychology experiment that I think is worth considering:
 

"Children who enjoy drawing were given marker pens and allowed to go at it. Some were rewarded for drawing (they were given a certificate with a gold seal and a ribbon, and told ahead of time about this arrangement), whereas for the others the issue of rewards was never raised. Weeks later, those who had been rewarded took less interest in drawing, and their drawings were judged to be lower in quality, whereas those who had not been rewarded continued to enjoy the activity and produced higher-quality drawings. The hypothesis is that the child begins to attribute his interest, which previously needed no justification, to the external reward, and this has the effect of reducing his intrinsic interest in it. That is, an external reward can affect one's interpretation of one's own motivation, an interpretation that comes to be self-fulfilling. A similar effect may account for the familiar fact that when someone turns his hobby into a business, he often loses pleasure in it. Likewise, the intellectual who pursues an academic career gets professionalized and this may lead him to stop thinking."
 
 

I'm not suggesting (nor do I believe that Crawford is suggesting) that the only way for people to be fully engaged in what they are doing is for them to be "recreating" all the time. However, I am suggesting that money (although important to all of us) isn't the only thing that keeps people motivated and engaged. In fact, I've observed that those who enter any particular profession strictly for its income potential eventually become discouraged and dis-engaged.

So what are we to do? Specifically, what are we to do concerning project teams?

In my opinion, how people are compensated for what they do says a couple of things:


  1. Your contribution is valued by the organization, and
  2. I, as your manager, value what you do

That being said, I believe that is only half of the equation. As project leaders, I think it's important to create an environment where people can acquire the sense that what they do has value beyond the particular tasks that they may be involved in. I'm a big proponent of making sure that everyone has visibility into organizational goals and objectives. Part of the reason I feel that way is because I believe most people (at least engaged people) want to feel like they are contributing to something bigger than themselves. When organizations fail to share the "big picture" with everyone, it's difficult for anyone to feel a part of something bigger than themselves.

I also believe that people need to be given a little autonomy in how they organize, prioritize, and accomplish their work. Now, I'm not naive enough to believe that every employee is ready to be pushed out into the world to figure it out for themselves. This is where leadership style and the project manager's ability to work with the team become important. Every individual is different, with different abilities and experiences. It's up to the project manager to objectively determine how much autonomy any given team member is ready for, and work to train and mentor everyone to reach a level where they can make decisions for themselves (and that includes mistakes). If you need to instruct the team in every move they need to make, I hope you enjoy doing it, because you are about to spend your entire career holding everyone's hand to make work happen.

I'm not suggesting that I have all the answers. In fact, this is something that I'm really just trying to figure out for myself. Over the coming months, I'll probably bring this topic up from time to time because I believe that as the workforce changes, we will need to change to keep up with it. I believe the days of employees doing their jobs because we pay them and because we tell them to do it are gone. I've observed that today's workforce is looking for something more than a paycheck, which might be one reason why the workforce jumps from one job to another every couple of years. As project leaders (at least in the microcosm of projects), we need to figure this out.

What do you think? Do you think it's possible that we can actually figure out how to tap into that internal "something" that not only motivates the workforce, but enables them to enjoy some intrinsic satisfaction in what they do?

 


Posted on: October 27, 2010 10:28 AM | Permalink

Comments (7)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
avatar
Andrej Ruckij Vilnius, Lithuania
i agree that workforce only partially depends on pay check (but i still think it depends), but other part of the motivation depends mostly on your (as a leader) passion for the subject: product, project, way of work and etc.

avatar
Ty Kiisel Manager Social Outreach| AtTask Lehi, Ut, United States
Andrej,

I believe all those things are part of what it takes to keep project teams motivated. Thanks for contributing to the conversations.

eioannid
Experience showed that a good salary can only guarantee that people come every day at work; feeling creative is what makes them productive and good work relations make them feel responsible for the work they deliver to internal/ external clients. I am using all available soft skills and personal attributes, to achieve the 3rd parameter. For the 2nd one, I am presenting my team with the big picture for every project: how their piece of work affects the other project teams and stakeholder and how it is linked to the final goal of the project. Sometimes this is too much of info; most of them will just filter it out. But when I was a resource, I was feeling better to know what piece of the puzzle was my work, so I am keeping it as a rule to share all info with the whole team at the begining of each project. Up to the point that project constraints allow it, I am trying to give to the same resource a whole part of work: make him/her responsible from the phase of desing to final delivery. Software developers are creative creatures by nature. They like building from scratch.

eioannid
Experience showed that a good salary can only guarantee that people come every day at work; feeling creative is what makes them productive and good work relations make them feel responsible for the work they deliver to internal/ external clients. I am using all available soft skills and personal attributes, to achieve the 3rd parameter. For the 2nd one, I am presenting my team with the big picture for every project: how their piece of work affects the other project teams and stakeholder and how it is linked to the final goal of the project. Sometimes this is too much of info; most of them will just filter it out. But when I was a resource, I was feeling better to know what piece of the puzzle was my work, so I am keeping it as a rule to share all info with the whole team at the begining of each project. Up to the point that project constraints allow it, I am trying to give to the same resource a whole part of work: make him/her responsible from the phase of desing to final delivery. Software developers are creative creatures by nature. They like building from scratch.

avatar
Andrej Ruckij Vilnius, Lithuania
"Software developers are creative creatures by nature. They like building from scratch."
yes, and sometimes it's bad, when they want to change everything

avatar
Ty Kiisel Manager Social Outreach| AtTask Lehi, Ut, United States
Thanks for contributing to the conversation. I'm a big advocate myself of keeping everyone informed of the big picture. Sometimes it's easy for project teams to become isolated in the particular tasks they're working on and become disengaged because they don't really grasp what it is they are actually doing. The work done by project teams isn't always something tangible, like building a car or painting a portrait. I think it's important to allow people to participate and celebrate in the completion of something.

Thanks again for being a part of the conversation.

avatar
Dee Rider Program Manager| NETCONN Solutions Hagerstown, Md, United States
We are currently struggling with this delimna right now in our company. We have some proponents of give 'em more and they will do a good job and other proponents that say, they are getting enough, let them do their job. Over my many years in project management, I have to agree that helping the team see the "big picture" and leading them to believe they are a part of something bigger than just their contribution is what drives them. I am not sure if it is a sense that they have to do a good job because someone else is going to see their work or if they really believe they are part of the "big picture" I would like to believe the latter, but have met some who believe they can't let anyone else see their work if it is not perfect. Either way however, it is the personal satisfaction of the job, not the money, that helps them strive to be successful in their career.

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS
ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors