Several years ago I had a colleague declare to me, "I don't think it's important that you're happy at work. It's just a job anyway, why all the fuss to find happiness at work?"
He was a much younger colleague and was working in a field outside of his college education, so I guess he was trying to justify settling for his current job when he really wanted to be doing something else. I must disagree with him. Because I spend the lion's share of each day working, it's hard for me to imagine doing something that was unfulfilling or distasteful for the rest of my life. How about you?
In a recent article titled How to Build an Army of Happy, Busy Worker Bees from CNN Money and written by Linda Mignone, she writes, "Aside from it sounding sensible, recent studies have demonstrated that the happier a worker is, the more productive they will be on the job. While an employee may appear engaged in their work, they may not be as effective as they could be if they were happy."
I've observed this to be true during my career. She continues, "People who are happy at work put in far more effort, work longer hours, and are more productive than those who aren't. They remain at their jobs twice as long and they work 25% more time than an unhappy employee works."
I've really come to appreciate what appears to be the culture at Zappos. They seem to be honestly concerned about the work environment and whether or not their people are happy. According to Zappos founder Tony Heisch, happiness at work begins with giving employees a sense that they are part of something bigger and that they feel connected to the work they do. I couldn't agree more. I believe people have a fundamental desire to accomplish something meaningful.
Mignone suggests something I've been supporting for quite a while now, "Have the team establish their vision for getting to a solution, creating their own time-lines and benchmarks. It's important to provide guidance along the way and hold them accountable, but the goal is to give them autonomy."
Quoting Jessica Pryce-Jones, CEO of HR consulting firm iOpener, Mignone writes, "People want more sense of control. [When organizations put] in more controls, they get the opposite of what they want." She continues, "Pride, trust and recognition from the company are critical factors in happiness. Give the team the resources they need to get the job done and provide them with recognition that they are part of an important project even before they begin."
Mignone also suggest that we give the team visibility at the highest levels of the organization and give them opportunities to present ideas to senior staff—and let them know that they are responsible for those ideas. "When employees feel like they have some control over the work they are doing and when they feel like they're making progress, they are generally happier and more productive, and these feelings are often amplified when employees are part of a team." writes Mignone. "A team makes a bigger, bolder, richer sound, with more layers, like an orchestra. And the richest sounds come when the team feels they are part of something big; a big idea, a vision."
These are themes that I personally agree with. Unlike my discouraged colleague from a few years back, I believe it's not only important for us to be happy at work, it's critical that we create an environment within our project teams where individual contributors can feel like they are part of something important, gain recognition for their contribution and be happy.
What do you do to create a happy and productive environment within your project teams?
Do Happy Team Members Really Make a Difference?
Comments (15)
![]() | dazimmer |
Patrick Lencioni hits it on the head in his book, "Three Signs of a Miserable Job." You can read my review about the book, along with another excellent book by Matthew Kelly, "The Dream Manager" on my book review website http://amresources.ameagle.com/.
The three signs of miserable jobs are anonimity (no one cares about me personally, just what I can do for them), irrelevance (it doesn''t matter to anyone if I do a good job or not) and immeasurability (and even if I did a good job, how would I measure its impact on my job, environement and those around me). In the environments where we were "happy," we know each other personally, more than just workhorses. We knew we were making a difference and those to whom it mattered, they let us know.
So, happiness is not the proper word for this discussion. But building a cultural where people are known, valued and appreciated is critical.
My thought here is that perhaps the realitiy is that companies can get away with treating employees badly if certain conditions exist (e.g. the economy is bad, employees have irrelevant job experience, etc.), so they can "ride them hard and put them away wet"---and the company can materially benefit (lower average wages, fewer FTEs as they are also working longer hours). Perhaps the project triangle would say that Quality would have to suffer (time, cost, quality---pick two). Well some companies can get away with lousy products for years and still do well. Thus an aggravated recession could actually be a resource usage opportunity for some companies and some industries. ........................................................................................................................................................................................................
Yes, when the economy turns around there might be hell to pay, but by then the mgmt could retire or also move on. So, keeping people happy is sometimes an expensive option in certain competitive environments. In other words, treating employees badly is so prevalent there must be an economic justification for it, and this is the best I could think of.
I remember watching an episode of the British sitcom "Faulty Towers" with John Cleese where there was an American businessman who''s basic answer to any management problem was "Bust their ass".
Maybe Adam Smith's invisible hand is a smacking one, as we are the world's economic jugernaut (and China is the new model but basically a nation of slaves under a tolerant despot).
However the research says treat people as if you like and value them---that sounds like France. Interesting dilemma.
Is it important that people are happy at work? I think so. Happy people are better able to creatively solve problems, have less HR issues and better health. Unfortunately, there's still a lot of "Bust their ass" sentiment in many boardrooms. And, what's more, it doesn't work. Nobody likes being bullied and fear as a motivational tactic just doesn't work for very long.
Kevin, it may sound like France
Thanks for this wonderful conversation everyone.
If the context of a project however - I have seen situations where the requirements are very specific, there is an end point in sight and an unhappy team could effectively drive toward a well defined near term result. I think that a lot of companies treat work as a series of unhappy sprints where some employees are replaced as they burn out. It's not what we want to see happen, but it's often the reality of the situation when we are in sketchy economic times.
As the economy picks up however, employee motivation/enthusiasm/happiness will become more important again. All of these things speak to retention which will be much more important in the coming months and years.
If we ignore that, we loose an easy opportunity to increase productivity.
Now, instead of asking what management should do to change the situation in order to create a more sustainable and happy environment, let's ask ourselves - "Imagine that you are a pathetic drone that belongs to situation 1) above, what changes would you like to see and what will motivate you and brighten up your day in your current job? In other words, if it happened that you managed to switch from situation 1) to 2), what are the significant changes around you that you would be able to observe immediately?"
Try listing them down as I believe this will point us to some useful tips on how to maintain a happy environment. Here are a few points from me as a start,
1. Politics-free team.
2. We share anything and everything in the team - high trust level in team.
3. It is not just work, we have funs too.
4. We welcome healthy competition in the team - that motivates us to do better.
5. We have team logo, mission statement, photo, portal etc. - strong team bonding and identity.
Happy workers = Focused, more productive project teams...Totally, agree with Dave no one is responsible for your happiness.
If your a PM focus on the 80/20; this motivation syndrome will not disappear anytime soon. Also, get creative; get to know your team members; find out what their motivations are.
Organizations have a huge challenge today to do more with less and less. HR will come around to be more engaged with the organization; it needs to happen sooner than later.
"Totally, agree with Dave no one is responsible for your happiness."
I agree, but others can cause your unhappiness.
Ken says "Others can cause your unhappiness"; I don't agree. You choose your attitude every day at work and home; others don't choose it for you.
Unhappiness in any shape or form is conflict based on some internal or external influence to the individual or team or organization. Morale is certainly an issue in today's organizations but you can choose to become a party to the conflict or manage it for a win-win solution for you, the individual and the team. Managers, PMs and team members can and should learn to deal with conflict and learn more about emotional intelligence. Just like anything, you have to practice these leadership skills daily to get better at listening, reading body language, managing conflict and coaching and mentoring your team. Read more here in this great brochure; lots of just in time tips on conflict:
http://www.foundationcoalition.org/publications/brochures/conflict.pdf
Please Login/Register to leave a comment.
|
"No Sane man will dance." - Cicero |





PMI Team Member