As many of you know from my last couple of posts, I'm spending the week in Japan meeting customers and preparing for a presentation at the PMI Japan conference to be held on Saturday. I'm having a great time (despite the record-breaking heat).
Over the last several months, I've had a couple of conversations about the effectiveness of email as a project-related communication medium. Today I had an interesting conversation with a very sharp Japanese project manager about her efforts to eliminate email and manage all their project communications through their project management software. Before I weigh in with my opinion, I'm interested to know if any of you have attempted or been successful at the same thing.
Tell us about your experiences and in the next day or two, I'll share my opinion regarding email, collaboration and project communication. Is email an effective tool for sharing project information? Is there a better way? What are you doing to successfully promote communication and collaboration?
Is Email the Best Way to Communicate and Collaborate?
Posted on: July 14, 2011 04:59 AM |
Permalink
Comments (3)
Please login or join to subscribe to this item
Two answers - the simple one to the simple question of is Email the best way to communicate and collaborate - answer NO.
The more complex answer to the complex question of how to communicate and collaborate is to use all the possible tools you have that work in your situation including face to face (personal and group settings) , telephone calls (again personal or group) , email, other collaboration tools that are accessible to everyone and your project management software - probably in that order and remembering that not all parties have access/experience with various tools. That tied together with a comprehensive communication plan that addresses the who, when, what and how up front and is followed throughout the execution of the project is the most effective method I have found.
Always remember - meetings, Email, telephones, and project management software are just tools and, as a wise mentor of mine continues to remind me "A fool with a tool is still a fool". The corollary of this is the infamous saying “If you only have a hammer, every problem looks like a nail”. The problems we face today are not that simple and if you are trying to solve them all one way you are destined to failure or at best sub optimal performance.
The more complex answer to the complex question of how to communicate and collaborate is to use all the possible tools you have that work in your situation including face to face (personal and group settings) , telephone calls (again personal or group) , email, other collaboration tools that are accessible to everyone and your project management software - probably in that order and remembering that not all parties have access/experience with various tools. That tied together with a comprehensive communication plan that addresses the who, when, what and how up front and is followed throughout the execution of the project is the most effective method I have found.
Always remember - meetings, Email, telephones, and project management software are just tools and, as a wise mentor of mine continues to remind me "A fool with a tool is still a fool". The corollary of this is the infamous saying “If you only have a hammer, every problem looks like a nail”. The problems we face today are not that simple and if you are trying to solve them all one way you are destined to failure or at best sub optimal performance.
I don't think email is the best way to communicate - face to face is. But email isn't that bad. I think it is engrained in people's ways of working. It's easy (to the point of being dangerously easy). And using a project management tool doesn't come naturally to everyone; teams are generally larger than the people who have to use the tool constantly. I'm looking forward to hearing your thoughts, Ty!
There are a lot of discussions on this topic, both from academics and online forums. Apparently, there is no single best approach as each communication mode has its own goods and bads. For example, face-to-face is good way to get instant response, both verbal and body language, and best fit situation where we need to clarify something. However, face-to-face communication does not give people enough time like email approach to think through what you want to say before saying it. This may increase the possibility that a person being said something inappropriate which might offend others. If you have received a nasty mail from an enraged customer, you may take a day to chill it off before replying (a luxuary that is not possible in face-to-face communication). On the other hand, people may also argue that converations through emails may, in this case, be masqueraded and do not reflect the true intent. So, the debate can go on and on...
What we usually do when defining communication plan in projects is, we will select the most appropriate mode of communication (How), frequency of communication (When), the right content for the communication (What) for the targeted audience (Who) based on the objective of the communication (Why).
What we usually do when defining communication plan in projects is, we will select the most appropriate mode of communication (How), frequency of communication (When), the right content for the communication (What) for the targeted audience (Who) based on the objective of the communication (Why).
Please Login/Register to leave a comment.
ADVERTISEMENTS
|
"The higher up you go, the more mistakes you are allowed. Right at the top, if you make enough of them, it's considered to be your style." - Fred Astaire |



