Project Management

PPM Tools Designed for Humans

From the The Business Driven PMO Blog
by
Stories from the trenches and practical advice on how PMOs can more effectively support, prioritize and fund strategic business initiatives.

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

What’s So Bad About Spreadsheets?

Top Five PPM Trends to Watch Out For in 2014

Insights and Trends: Current Project Portfolio Management Adoption Practices

Life after project completion: Is a project complete without benefits realization?

How Important is Adoption for a PMO?

Categories

2012 Takeaways, Active Projects, Adoption, Adoption Practices, Benefits Realization, Best Practices, Business Direction, Business Process, Business Value, BYOD, Clinger-Cohen, Continual Improvement, Daptiv, Daptiv Connect, Daptiv PPM, Decision Board, Decision Making, Educause 2012, Edward Deming, Events, Federal Government, Gamifiication, Gartner, Gartner Symposium, IT Governance, IT Leaders, IT Project, Lean PMO, Magic Quadrant, Mobile, Obama, optimal schedule, PMO, PMO, PMO Success Webinars, Portfolio Management, PPM, PPM Consulting, PPM solution, PPM Tools, Prioritization, Project Managers, Project Management, Project Manager, Project Managers, project managers, Project Reviews, Project Staff, Resource Leveling, Risk Analysis, ROI, SaaS PPM, Saving Projects, Scoring Models, Spreadsheets, Strategic EPMO, successful PMO, Survey, Team Collaboration, Teams, Top Management

Date

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  


I noticed a recent blog on the PMI site from Saira Karim, called ‘Use Project Management Tools in the Right Context’. Saira started her post with the following:

“Recently I came across an ad for a project management technology application. It was a picture of seven robots in a group, which symbolized humans. The slogan read, “If your team looked like this, any PPM solution would work.”

Interestingly, that’s a Daptiv ad she noticed in the PMI magazine. Saira continues:

“It made me wonder how many organizations actually believe that technology applications do the work and produce results — not humans.

How many organizations and project managers sufficiently analyze their project needs and the compatibility of new technology to their organizations’ existing set-up and processes?

Companies often buy expensive project management applications and then force teams to conform and adapt to the application rather than customize the application to the needs of the people and project.

But buying applications because other organizations use them does not by default mean you, too, will become a leader.

Like with best practices, experience has taught me that technology and tools are valuable — but only if they fill gaps and needs effectively.

Technology is important and can increase efficiency, but in the correct setting and context. Projects are planned and executed by people — therefore technology must complement and be understood by the humans who use it.

Before investing in new project management applications, you must consider things like training, costs and your team members’ willingness to use the tools. Otherwise it could amount to an expensive burden.”

Saira’s post is a great articulation of the importance of the need for tools that adapt to your organization’s business needs. Combining a flexible tool with a PPM roadmap that is improves maturity in successive steps is the key to PPM success.

Have you had experience with tool implementations that have failed (or succeeded)? What are your keys to success?


Posted on: December 30, 2011 08:22 PM | Permalink

Comments (1)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
avatar
Kartik Sehgal Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
I kind of agree with Saira. Somehow people I know personally and getting an opportunity to work as a project manager seem to think everything should be automated. When tools don't get them results they blame everything from clients, management, team, etc except themselves for projects that fail.

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS
ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors