Project Management

Beware Reverse Delegation

From the ProjectsAtWork Blog
by
Breaking barriers and building bridges to better manage projects and lead teams.

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

Don’t Wait to Make Your AI Move

Help Influence Real AI Content

Let’s Talk About Burnout

Will AI Impact Your Job This Time?

Choose Wisely

Categories

adversity, agile, agility, Artificial Intelligence, career, career development, change, communication, communications, culture, decision-making, execution, Innovation, Leadership, people, problem solving, process, risk, social good, strategy, team, virtual, Women in PM

Date

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  


Decision-making is an important part of what project leaders do. But that doesn’t mean they should make all the decisions.

You have talented people on your project team. Right? They have the technical skills and knowledge needed to execute the plan, to deliver value, to make stakeholders happy. But the other day, a couple members of the team asked you if they should go with technical option A or B. What do you do? In many cases, the best answer is to choose neither.

That’s because there are times when you should not decide, specifically in areas of expertise where the decision is better delegated. By making the decision in these situations, you are practicing "reverse delegation," and it can cause problems down the road.

When you make a decision that someone else has the expertise or experience to make, you are diminishing their ownership of the solution—and their investment in the entire project, for that matter. Worse, you’re shutting down an opportunity to build confidence in your team members that will help when other issues need to be faced in the future.

It's easy to fall into the reverse delegation trap, though—especially if you came up from a technical background. If you’ve become a project leader after years of working on technical issues, you might want to continue to oversee those decisions on your team. But remember, those technical folks on your team are like you once were, and they probably have more current knowledge about certain aspects of the project than you do.

So, make a conscious decision to delegate more decisions.

First, recognize that team members have a natural inclination to consult you. They know the project manager is the one person putting their reputation on the line for the project, and they want to know what you think. But remind team members of their role and value on the project.

Of course, it is still your responsibility as a project leader to examine whether there is an underlying problem that might hinder your team’s ability to make decisions. Ask yourself these questions and correct accordingly:

1. Do team members understand stakeholder values and project priorities? Set the stage early for good decisions by communicating clearly about the project charter, scope and stakeholder expectations—and how they relate to the decision criteria of cost, schedule and quality.

2. Do team members feel empowered to make decisions? Consider whether they are comfortable with and confident in their position. Some people want to give decisions back to the project manager so that they are free of the consequences.

And there will always be cases when you should still be the decider.

If the team can't agree, you need to break the deadlock so the project can proceed. Does one approach carry more risk than another, for example? But do this as infrequently as possible because ultimately it takes away some of the empowerment you had hoped to use to your project’s advantage.

You’ve been on teams, so you already know from experience that many, if not most, decisions are best made closest to where the actual work is being done. Now’s your turn as a leader to make sure that happens on your projects.


Posted on: August 10, 2021 02:52 PM | Permalink

Comments (14)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
avatar
Luis Branco CEO| Business Insight, Consultores de Gestão, Ldª Carcavelos, Lisboa, Portugal
Dear Aaron
The theme that brought to our reflection and debate is very interesting.
Thanks for sharing your opinions.

If the delegation process is well implemented, I am convinced that the risk of what you call "reverse delegation" will be minimized.

I subscribe: "When you make a decision that someone else has the expertise or experience to make, you are diminishing their ownership of the solution—and their investment in the entire project, for that matter. Worse, you're shutting down an opportunity to build confidence in your team members that will help when other issues need to be faced in the future"

avatar
Ning Tang China, Mainland
Faced in the future Is very important to make a decision

avatar
Francois Hogue Saint-Lambert, Quebec, Canada
You make very good points Aaron, especially with respect to treating with respect team members' competencies that are supposed to be basis for you to rely on them being there in the first place. The main difficulty is finding the balance between delegating decision-making and offloading liability or accountability for outcomes. It remains the project manager's responsibility to clearly state the essential criteria for decision-making and for satisfaction over outcomes. Not all, if any, team members may be aware of, let alone competent about, all decision-related issues especially the ones that wind up being critical from a managerial or executive perspective. Team members may easily decline this delegation of decision-making if there is any perception of risk of implicit scapegoating over silent expectations not being met.

avatar
Daniel King Senior Project/Solution Manager| Norlys København, Denmark
Thank you Aaron for sharing your insight and the article! I fully agree with you on enabling that “opportunity to build confidence in your team members” - that's so important and rewarding.

avatar
Kwiyuh Michael Wepngong
Community Champion
Financial Management Specialist | US Peace Corps Yaounde, Centre, Cameroon
Thanks Aaron

avatar
Duane McKoy Principal Consultant| Mfinite Consulting Maryland, United States
Good info Aaron.


I agree with your statement about ensuring the team understands the stakeholders, charter, and scope. Once a team member understands the impact their actions have on a project or an operation, it helps them to determine the right path to take without asking for help. For example, it is easy to tell a subordinate to install a communications circuit, but, if they understand that the circuit is a dedicated line that will be used as a hotline between world leaders, or transmits critical health and medical information, it helps them to make independent, critical. risk-related decisions.

avatar
Stephen Parsons Project Manager| Private Company Franklin, Tn, United States
Good managers never let a subordinate delegate up. If a subordinate doesn't bring a solution to a problem, they need to go back and find one.

avatar
Duane McKoy Principal Consultant| Mfinite Consulting Maryland, United States
Stephen,
I agree with this up to a certain point. I think every situation is different. I used to hear this all the time when I was in the military. Now, working in a more political arena, it is a little better for the subordinates to attempt to solve the problem as long as there is no risk to the project/company/stakeholders/mission. The area I am currently supporting has leadership that will say "bring me a solution" but still will not act on it leaving their subordinates at square one. I think each environment is different and good managers and leaders should provide as much information about their working environment as possible to their subordinates. This will empower them to make decisions and keep the initiatives moving forward.

avatar
Stefano Galbusera Project Manager| Schneider Electric Robbiate, Lecco, Italy
Thanks, Aaron. I definitively concur.

avatar
Michael Coleman Memphis, Tn, United States
Thank you for this evaluation, Aaron. Effective project practices and outcomes are usually about the people working on these endeavors and how they are made to feel and 'gel' with the project team. It is highly important to establish trust and transparency among project team members.

avatar
Ma Bin Risk Consultant| IBM China, Mainland
in project charter should setup a clear decision process and a clear escalate process
PM need reverse power to do judgement for unsolved issues, their decision based on impact on project success or fail not technical itself.

avatar
Vishakha Rai Founder| Omsruti India
Thanks Aaron

avatar
Bamidele Apata Project manager | IBADAN ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria
Thanks for sharing Aaron.

avatar
Troy Walker Director| VW International Centreville, Va, United States
Thanks Aaron! Seems like the trick is really understanding which decisions really should remain with you vice leaving with an SME. As the PM, you may have context that the SME doesn't. Thus the decision to/not to decide may not be as straight forward. In educating the team on context, it could be interpreted as putting your foot on the scale.

Regardless, your point is well taken and in most instances, will be the one I pursue. Thanks!

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS

"Life does not cease to be funny when people die any more than it ceases to be serious when people laugh."

- George Bernard Shaw

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors