Project Management

The Humble Process

From the PM-Interface Blog
by
The PM Interface is a place for discussions, insights, and personal experiences related to project management. Here you'll find articles with an interesting perspective relating to a variety of PM topics. Please leave a comment, or disagreement. Your feedback is valuable.

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

Hiatus: completing a degree

Three Surefire Ways to Improve Your Presentation, and Engage Your Audience

Are You Communicating? Three out of Five Leaders aren't, but They Think They Are!

I Miss the Cold War

PMI Global Congress - Day III (Last Day: Climbing to the Summit & Goodbyes)

Categories

Business, Communications Management, Leadership, Leadership Summit, PMI Global Congress, PMP Exam, Presentations, Project Success, Region 7, Risk Management, Strategy, Systems, Talent Triangle, Volunteering

Date

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  


By Mike Adams, PMP®

VP Education - PMI Otowi Bridge

Part 2 of 2

Click here for the first article, Humble Pie, Nutritious and Delicious

Is humility actually a process? To answer that question, let’s start with a definition. Dictionary.com defines process as “a systematic series of actions directed to some end.” So it is clear that a process involves doing something, with the goal of producing a specific result. In the PMBOK 5th edition, PMI has identified 48 discreet processes involved in managing projects, each having specific inputs, tools and techniques and outputs.
 
In this article, we’ll look at humility from the perspective that it is a process with inputs, tools and techniques and outputs. This will by no means be a comprehensive exploration of humility, rather it is a place to look for those who wish to bring their leadership skills to the next level by working on development of humility in leadership.
 
In thinking about this article, I discussed the topic with several people, and have identified many potential inputs that could be acted on by tools and techniques. The listed outputs are important for the success of any effective project. Below is a PMI process diagram examining humility as a process.
 
 
The first thing I notice is that the list of inputs looks pretty ugly. Who in their right mind would want to admit to being resentful, jealous and finding fault with others? Its counter-intuitive, and goes against our nature as people to admit that our actions have landed so far from our ideals. The list of inputs may seem more like things you’d expect a nasty gossip to say about an unpopular person…hopefully not you!
 
In reality, however, that list of inputs is what we need in our search for humility. We need to be really straight with ourselves and we need the willingness to examine our motives using blunt terms, rather than euphemism. If we want the benefits of humble leadership, we must be ruthless in our self-assessment. There is no room for protection of ego if our concern is with finding our own expression of an extraordinary leader. We will have to ruthlessly examine specifically how we stand in the way of our own potential.
 
As an example, I’ll point to my experience over the past couple of years in my current position. Nearly two years ago, I was placed on a team as a subject matter expert for a major software upgrade. Shortly after the project kick-off, work proceeded without much team input. I soon realized that my schedule had been made without respect to my functional responsibilities in the organization. I worked hard to do a good job as an SME, but avoided the cumbersome documentation that the PM requested to keep tabs on daily progress.
 
I tried to discuss the situation with the PM, but felt that I consistently received a response of, “Well that is really between you and your manager. It isn’t my responsibility.” Tension grew between us, and in the end, we had numerous tense conflicts. Both of us were convinced that the other person was at fault, and I don’t believe either of us looked with much diligence for how we had individually contributed to the situation.
 
By the time the project ended, we didn’t really get along, and co-workers commented how there was notable tension between us. At the same time, I had begun a rigorous seven month course, focused on leadership. In the course, I learned to look at failures in performance from the context of what actions did I fail to take, which would have made a difference, rather than how am I flawed. This allowed me to completely alter an area of my marriage that my wife and I had simply learned to avoid. I saw that every time we started a discussion on “that” topic, I became defensive, and perceived that my wife was verbally attacking me. I saw that what I was failing to do was bring compassion to our conversations. That if I would see my wife as another human being, trying to navigate a difficult and stressful situation, I could choose to offer compassion, rather than outrage. Within a month, our relationship was unrecognizable from what it had been, we were closer than ever, and my change in outlook impacted areas of our relationship that seemingly had no relevance.
 
I wondered what would happen at work if I brought compassion into my interactions there. I asked myself what I needed to do differently, what actions and attitudes I adopted in order to “look good,” or “save face.” I ruthlessly faced my arrogance and lack of compassion for others. I approached a few people, to whom I owed an apology, and I apologized. Within a month, I received two awards at high profile meetings from high level managers. My Department Head noted that she had observed a profound shift in behavior and performance. She told me that I am both highly competent technically, and an extraordinary leader. But the biggest change was with that PM, with whom I had quarreled. He became an ally, and that has been constant.
 
By asking the “difficult questions” listed under tools and techniques. By looking for and identifying the actions I didn’t take, or shouldn’t have taken, and by ruthlessly examining my attitude, I have become someone who receives high praise from workers. I have developed a reputation as an effective communicator, leader and team member. Let me be clear, I am not a humble person, but I have been able to treat humility as a process and elevate my performance significantly.
 
Some comments in my previous article lead me to believe that quite a few people equate humility with not providing leadership, or direction. This is not what I mean, but I'm curious, if you disagree. Also, if you do question the value of humility in project leadership, what does humility mean to you? Another excellent point in the discussion on my previous post has to do with short term projects aimed a turning a quick profit. What are your thoughts on humility as a process in that situation?
 
Please share with us your experiences with asking tough questions of yourself, or ruthlessly assessing how you’ve acted in light of what was possible, and what was needed. Let us know how a humble leader positively affected you or a friend. I look forward to your comments.

Posted on: December 18, 2014 08:11 AM | Permalink

Comments (12)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
avatar
Patti Gilchrist Product Manager| UnitedHealth Group Bluffton, Sc, United States
Very insightful Michael. I hadn't thought of humility in this way before. Thanks for sharing, this certainly has expanded my perspective.
Patti

avatar
Michael Adams Solutions Architect| LANL Los Alamos, Nm, United States
Thanks Patti!

This actually came out of a conversation I had with a middle schooIer. They said, "I don't really understand humility."

As we talked, it occurred to me that humility could be thought of as a practice, rather than a trait. That it could be expressed as a process.

The kid I was talking to said, "I guess my favorite teacher is humble." This made me think of humility's place in leadership.

I appreciate you're taking a few moments to share your thoughts.

avatar
Andy Kaufman Host| People and Projects Podcast Lake Zurich, Il, United States
Michael, I absolutely love that you're exploring this! Humility is like many topics: we recognize it when we see it, but can be difficult to define in a practical way. For example, though there are academic definitions of quality, leadership, and humility, it's often easier to recognize it then put together a pithy definition.

I think we also easily fall into the trap of thinking it's innate: Michael is a humble person. It's something you either get or your don't--it's a personality issue that comes through the genetic lottery. Your work on this is helpful to getting us past that bias!

Dr. Ed Schein wrote a book in 2013 entitled Humble Inquiry: The Gentle Art of Asking Instead of Telling. There are some points from his book that you might find relevant to your fleshing out of humility as a process...

* As the book's subtitle implies, Ed is convinced that part of the problem with humility is how we see our roles. If you are a "boss", your job is to be a teller, not an asker. Early in the book he states "It has always bothered me how even ordinary conversations tend to be defined by what we tell rather than by what we ask. Yet all my teaching and consulting experience has taught me that what builds a relationship, what solves problems, what moves things forward is asking the right questions." His point reinforces your tool and technique of asking difficult questions. And with our knowledge of the PMBOK Guide, we might suggest that there's an Enterprise Environmental Factor (or culture) of telling not asking. Finally, this point might suggest an input of "Balance of Power" since Ed's research found this significantly impacts whether someone displays humility or not.

* Ed suggests in the book that humility is easier to employ when we realize we are mutually inter-dependent on each other. If I think I know everything, I'm less likely to be humble. When I realize our project or career success is mutually inter-dependent on the people around us, it's a lot easier to be humble. When a manager realizes there is information that is not getting to him or her from the people lower in the organization, Ed suggests they are more humble. In the context of a process, I'm not sure if mutual inter-dependence is a tool and technique or an input (I think it's the former), but Ed's point seems well taken.

Ed admits in the book that this is all easy to talk about yet more difficult to implement in the moment. He boils it down to:
* Do less telling.
* Do more asking.
* Get better at listening to, and acknowledging, others.

To that last point, one of the top lessons I've had pounded into me this last year is the need to be a better listener. We had interviews with Mark Goulston and Donny Ebenstein on the podcast this last year. In both of their books (Just Listen and I Hear You), they reinforce that perhaps the single biggest issue when dealing with relationships is how much someone feels heard.

Your "Acknowledge Others" tool and technique probably covers that point. But as you continue to flesh out your model, you might want to consider specifically calling out active listening or listening skills.

Thank you for your great work on this topic, Michael! Well done!

P.S. There's a 4 minute video of Ed talking at IBM about Humble Inquiry. You can find it at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vK0BRFVBjEs

avatar
Michael Adams Solutions Architect| LANL Los Alamos, Nm, United States
Wow Andy,
I very much appreciate your comments. It is obvious that you think about your response and spend some time crafting what you'll say. I particularly appreciate your link to resources and additional information. I'm looking forward to the content that you linked to.

I like the focus on asking the right questions. That always reminds me of the scene from American History X, where Edward Norton's character is recovering from a prison attack in the prison hospital and he's visited by his former high school literature teacher, who says something to the effect of, "you've always got all kinds of answers, but the problem is you're never asking the right questions." Norton responds with, "what questions are those?" His teacher says, "Have you ever done anything that has made your life better, or made you more happy?" Norton's face shifts.

Its a great movie and though the point of it isn't humility, the lesson learned requires tremendous humility.

Thanks Andy for your most excellent comments, and links!

avatar
Narasimham Vempati Marketing Director| IrisDG Bay Area, Ca, United States
As captivation as part 1. I totally agree Humility is a process and I like the ITTO's you have laid out. Thank you for the wonderful article Michael

avatar
Michael Adams Solutions Architect| LANL Los Alamos, Nm, United States
Thank you Narasimham! I'm glad you like the ITTOs. That took some effort to create those. I had to photoshop the whole thing (I'm OK at photoshop, but not skilled).

Very Nice

avatar
Bernadine Douglas IT Project Manager| Consultant Topton, Pa, United States
Hi Michael,

Thank you for inviting me to your conversation about humility being a process. While I know it has been a while since your invitation, I had to take some time and give some thought to your discussion. I was also very curious about how you would have laid out your process suggestion for this. So after reading that post, I am now ready to join in your discussion.

Well, I think all the previous comments you received were very interesting, and you managed to maintain the interest of others on this topic. Great job!

Even with your inputs, tools, and outputs, I still have to maintain that humility is a trait. It is not a process. I am glad to see the outputs you have chosen.—trust, personal fulfillment, and extraordinary leadership. Effective action is important as well. I have no problems with the tools and techniques. They are well chosen and should be in that list. My problem lies with your Inputs. The ones you listed are good, however, there are of course many that are not. You will almost not always have a list all inclusive for either of the groups. But if you are only going to look at the negative inputs for humility, your thought process for the remainder of the groups are going to very short-sided.

So, what I mean is this. Let me direct you to your first article where a coworker was praised for doing good work. The leader who did this had to have well packaged humility. It takes courage and confidence to give someone else praise. You can go through your steps to have humility in the end, but if you don’t have confidence in your own skills or your own demeanor, you are just trodding along the waters of humiliation—forget trying to achieve humility for personal fulfillment.

All too often even we take a look at ourselves for personal development, we sometimes forget to look at the positive aspects we bring to the table. We forget to look at the positive aspects of what we have accomplished to date. You may have heard the saying where something looked at can be a blessing and can also be a curse. For instance, a nice person can be looked at in a positive manner. Then someone else can look at them as a person who is a push over or someone to take advantage of. So, this person’s personal development goal becomes seeking ways to deal with difficult people or how to become more aggressive. While all along, their nice personality may have earned them respect for not having to deal with negative confrontations because in the end, it almost is not even worth it. This person’s personality may have earned them achievements in getting things done, because people don’t mind working with someone who is nice and knows how to treat others in a nice way for them to want to be a help. Also, on the flip side a negative person can be seen as that difficult person and needing development in being a warmer human being. Or this person can be seen as someone who is aggressive, knows how to go after something and make things happen no matter who they tread on or how they accomplish it. In the end, they have gotten It done, but each time they need something done, they will resort to using the same tone and same tactics, because it is their nature now. No one is saying anything about them being right or wrong, but everyone is watching and listening for this person coming. They bring confidence and assurance to the table—sometimes too confident by some people''s standards maybe—but confidence nonetheless. . This is where you get into the discussion on the terms of “difficult people,” “passive,” and “aggressive,” etc. and who’s standards are these persons measured by—so too then brings discussions of age, gender, stereotype, culture (zodiac to some people, and so on) or what then.

If you are going to classify humility as a process, remember a process is a procedure. A procedure includes actions to accomplish a set end. So, if your set end is personal fulfillment and trust, yes, include criticism, mistakes, and even jealousy. But also include confidence, courage, and self-accomplishments. Then, go after humility with the scales off your eyes for whoever you have hurt and whatever you may truly need to change. Fault finding and graciously accepting praise becomes easier, because you are a little bit more aware of the thin line you cross that could easily be turned back on you if you don’t walk softly—or don’t have that humble nature. This is where I think the points of the culture touching your topic come into existence. Many cultures do have the meanings of humility drenched (or rather ingrown) in them in this manner—a trait—a characteristic of their being.

Thanks again for your invitation, and I hope my comments are of an appreciative value to your discussion.

Bernadine


avatar
Michael Adams Solutions Architect| LANL Los Alamos, Nm, United States
Hi Bernadine, I just noticed that you replied...many months later. Thanks for your thoughts on this topic. I appreciate your taking the time to really digest what I wrote and to write a lengthy and thoughtful response. I hope to hear more of your thoughts on other articles I may write or that others may write. Your perspective is interesting! Have you thought about writing an article for PreojectManagement.com?

avatar
Bernadine Douglas IT Project Manager| Consultant Topton, Pa, United States
Yes, Michael, sorry for my long delay to respond to your invitation to join the discussion on your article. Somehow, I missed it when it was originally sent, but am glad that I finally joined the conversation because it is a good article. In response to your mention of my writing for ProjectManagement.com, you may have not yet noticed, but I do have a blog on this site. Please look me up, and I welcome any additional comments you may have to share on my writings. Thanks, Bernadine

avatar
Luis Branco CEO| Business Insight, Consultores de Gestão, Ldª Carcavelos, Lisboa, Portugal
Dear Michael
Interesting your perspective on the topic: "The Humble Process"

Thanks for sharing

avatar
Michael Adams Solutions Architect| LANL Los Alamos, Nm, United States
Thank you, Luis.

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS

"If you can't convince them, confuse them."

- Harry S. Truman

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors