Project Management

Project Management 2.0

by
New technologies, concepts, and Web 2.0 tools are popping up everywhere. How can you use them to help your project team collaborate, communicate - or just give your project an extra boost? [Contact Dave]

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

Are You Prepping For The PMP 24/7?

Are You Just Too Darn Busy?

Eliciting Requirements... Creatively!

What To Expect When Your Stakeholders Are Expecting

8 More Templates to Save You Time

Categories

Advice, Certification, Collaboration Tools, Decision Making, Estimating, Interviews, Learning, Management Approaches, New Templates, Personal Productivity, PM Software, PPM Software, Presentation Tools, Reporting Tools, Requirements Management, Research, Risk Management, Scheduling Software, Security, shameless self promotion, Techie Tools, Time Killers, Time Tracking Software, Training, Virtual Team Tools, Web-based Tools, workshops

Date

Is SaaS PPM Right for Your Large Business?

Categories: PPM Software, Interviews

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  

Situation: You’re exploring Portfolio Management (PPM) software options. 

You’ve done your homework and come to the conclusion that there are essentially two options: on-premise installed software and software-as-a-service (SaaS).

PowerSteering Software provides SaaS PPM software for large enterprises, and their model has been gaining a lot of traction recently.  We recently spoke with their CEO, Stephen Sharp, and asked him a few questions about the benefits and pitfalls of this approach.  Here is what he had to say.


Q.  Most SaaS options appear to be designed for smaller companies or departments.  PowerSteering is unusual in that its SaaS offering is targeted at larger organizations. How does PowerSteering tailor its software to the needs of global enterprises with diverse businesses, functions and workflow?

The need for PPM flexibility is critical when you consider that the project lifecycle of a software development project may be quite different as compared to a new product launch which might require a strict stage-gate process. And to truly manage all work holistically, a PPM system must adapt to non-project work like routine IT help desk inquiries as well as the management of critical corporate assets like IT applications.  When all is said and done, work is work!

A popular misconception is that SaaS is limited to early-stage PPM deployments, departmental project management needs, or small to mid market companies because the software isn’t scalable or adaptable enough.  While this may be true for some SaaS vendors, PowerSteering’s enterprise class, highly configurable software is used by global organizations with thousands of users who need the software to accommodate different businesses, workflow, roles, project methodologies, and reporting needs.  And PowerSteering can also be configured to manage application portfolios and other non-project assets.

PowerSteering is unique in offering the best of both worlds: enterprise-class software with comprehensive and fully configurable PPM capabilities, along with the benefits of SaaS, including lower total cost of ownership, faster deployment, and better user adoption.


Q.  We’ve seen a lot of organizations who have more than one enterprise class PPM product in place.  Is that ever a challenge?  How do you work with that sort of situation when it arises?

It’s quite common for large companies to have a traditional IT PPM system that’s used for timesheets or cost management, but still need a more flexible SaaS option to address project and portfolio management needs outside of IT.  As a result, we made sure that PowerSteering supports non-technical, business users and seamlessly integrates with in-house systems to provide our customers with a single view of their consolidated project and portfolio metrics. 


Q.  You do a lot of work with companies who use PPM to manage project portfolios outside IT including Process Improvement, New Product Development and even Merger Integration which means you deal with more complexity and integration issues than most.  How does PowerSteering adapt to these situations?

We’re able to easily adapt our software to manage a variety of project portfolios that may use very different project prioritization models, project management methodologies, and cost/ benefit tracking metrics.  For example, an IT customer like Clorox is focused on capturing demand, aligning it with business strategies and resourcing it efficiently.  On the other hand, the Department of Defense is intent on consistent reporting of project financial benefits across the enterprise and the ability to successfully identify and replicate effective projects.   


Q.  In your demo, you talk about enabling executives to make value judgments about projects and how strategic organizational efforts are being addressed.  Can you give us an example of how this has worked at one of your clients?  What specific metrics do you look at that others might not?

A newly-appointed Corporate CIO of a diversified, global manufacturing conglomerate inherited a $500M IT budget, along with 29 divisional CIO’s who each had their own portfolios, priorities and budgets. The new CIO had no idea where or how effectively the IT budget was being spent. In just 3 weeks, he was able to create a project inventory across the global portfolio to assess the current status, projected ROI and budget of each active item.  A week later he cancelled 20% of the active projects and re-deployed the resources to more important priorities.  Each of the cancelled projects were either not aligned with the current strategy, targeted at systems to be retired, redundant with other projects, or so far off track that they needed to be
re-scoped.

The evaluation metrics included a priority score that measured multiple dimensions including the level of strategic fit, the probability of success, the financial value, the current status and the percent complete.


Q.  Do you see a point in the near future, where it’s all SaaS?  Why or why not?

Absolutely!  On-premise installed software isn’t really sustainable in the long-term when you consider how many implementations still fail to meet ROI objectives, are expensive and time-consuming to deploy and maintain, and impede user adoption. We’re eager to offer companies a practical enterprise alternative to outdated, inefficient and costly installed software.

#?-:nbsp;

Posted on: August 17, 2009 04:05 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)

Is Wiki-based Collaboration the Answer?

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  
Situation: Your collaboration tools just aren't cutting it.

The range of SaaS tools out there has expanded way beyond BaseCamp knock-offs to tools that approach projects from a variety of angles. Each tool has its own heritage that’s reflective of what the vendor believes is important.  One interesting tool that I’ve looked at recently is PBworks, formerly known as PBwiki.  Their approach is very collaborative in nature and less structured than most.  By providing easy ways for you to define your own structure, they hope to provide tools you can make fit your work style, versus having to adapt your work to rules imposed by the tool.

We recently spoke with Chris Yeh of PBworks, who told us a bit about their approach to collaboration and managing knowledge.  Here’s what he said.



Q.  You guys firmly believe that wikis provide a better collaboration platform than folder-based file sharing or email.  Can you tell us a bit about why that is? (provide examples if possible)

Wiki-based collaboration provides several major benefits that file sharing and email simply can’t.

First, let’s deal with file sharing.  The issue with file sharing is that it’s difficult to understand how a document has evolved over time.  At best, you might be able to view different versions of the file from some archive.
With a wiki, revision and change management are an integral part of how you work; all revisions are stored, you can see the history of changes with a single click, you can compare any two revisions, and you can always revert back to a prior version.

This kind of flexibility gives people the freedom to be more creative; you can take more risks because the revision history is there as a safety net.

Wikis also allow true co-authoring, rather than simply passing redlines back and forth.  When a group of people works on a document, the asynchronous edits are notoriously difficult to re-integrate.  Usually, whoever is responsible ends up having to read through several different drafts and manually integrate comments and suggestions.

With a wiki page, everyone is always working on a current version that reflects everyone else’s edits.  This decentralized approach saves a ton of time.  One of our customers is Deloitte Digital, which uses us for creating new business plans.  Their CEO, Peter Williams, reports that using PBworks lets them cut down the time they spent on editing final reports by 90%.

With email, the issues are slightly different.  The problem with email is that it’s so easy to lose the context of the conversation.  Most emails are not self-contained; to understand them, you have to read the entire conversation to pull out the nuggets of information that are actually relevant.

A wiki page provides a centralized, authoritative record; it is largely self-contained, and once you read it, you can make a decision or draw a conclusion.

Another PBworks customer is Capgemini, the consulting firm.  They were able to use PBworks to cut down project-related emails by 90% on one of their marketing projects.



Q.  You seem to specialize in certain industries, like creative, legal and financial services.  Is there something special about the ways that people work and collaborate in those industries that make your approach a fit?

We focus on use cases where individual users have to deal with multiple projects and initiatives, and where communications need to cross geographic or corporate boundaries.  We’ve designed our product so that not only can you use hosted wiki pages to collaborate, you can also get a personalized dashboard of activity, tasks, and milestones across all of your different projects.

For example, while designers and lawyers may seem very different, the challenges they face at work are very similar: They are staffed on multiple projects for multiple clients, and they have to keep track of a lot of tasks and information.  Both lawyers and agencies end up using PBworks in a very similar way to manage their client projects: They create new workspaces for each new project or case (using our workspace templates), they collaborate with a project team to get things done, and they track their progress using a personalized dashboard.  Whether you’re building informercial websites like Livemercial, or prosecuting a personal injury case like McConnell & Sneed, the collaboration process is very similar.



Q.  Every toolset has implementation challenges.  What are yours and what approaches do you use to get around them?

One of the big challenges with adopting a broad collaboration platform like PBworks is that there are so many possibilities.  Even I don’t know all of the capabilities of the product, and with our engineering team adding new functionality all the time, sometimes people aren’t sure where to begin.

That’s why we put such a heavy emphasis on certain specific solution-focused product editions, like Project Edition for project leaders or Legal Edition for lawyers.  This allows us to do things like build usage-specific templates, instructional videos, and case studies.

We also back up our product with some of the best service in the business.  You can contact our support team via email, and get a response from a real human being in hours, sometimes even in minutes.  And if you need help getting started, we offer a $100 custom trial package which gets you professional services to customize our product and provide a one-on-one training session.



Q.  A big part of project management is having a high-level view of what’s going on.  There’s no gantt chart view, task dependencies, etc. in PBworks.  Is that intentional or are those features to be added later?

It’s intentional.  We’re big fans of rapid iteration and innovation, so our general approach is to launch a simple, usable product, and build up from there based on feedback from real users.  For example, PBworks started off as PBwiki, a bare-bones hosted wiki.  It didn’t even offer user accounts.  But over time, it’s evolved into a full hosted collaboration suite, complete with document management, basic project management, and even a mobile edition for iPhones and Blackberries.

After we launched Project Edition, we immediately began hearing feedback on issues like task dependencies and measuring resource load.  We’re working on such features, and many more.

It’s also the case that we heard from a number of project managers who thought that the level of detail and customization was just right.  Let’s face it; many projects are not complex enough to warrant a full project management solution, yet are more complicated than a simple to-do list can handle.  PBworks is great for those ad hoc projects that make up most of our work lives.



Q.  What do you feel the biggest challenge in collaboration today (beyond what you’ve addressed in PBworks) and what is your organization doing to address it going forward?

The biggest challenge in collaboration today is encouraging the end user to make online collaboration an integral part of their daily work.  Tools that require users to abandon old but comfortable ways of working, or that require double entry, aren’t going to work out in the long run.
I think that collaboration has a lot to learn from the bottom-up usability of social media tools like Twitter.  These informal and unstructured tools are a great way to handle the initial phases of brainstorming, when you don’t even know the objective of your proto-project.  We’re looking very closely at these tools and how our customers use them so that we can integrate their lessons into our products.
Ultimately, collaboration is about bringing together, people, processes, and production.  Collaboration vendors won’t be successful unless their products can bring together all three of those elements.
Posted on: August 08, 2009 10:51 AM | Permalink | Comments (9)

Positive ROI from a Project Management Conference?

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  
Situation: You're on the hunt for great PM learning deals.

The bright spots in this economy are coming in the form of great deals from leading providers.  Two weeks ago, I told you about ESI’s awesome $500K scholarship program for unemployed PMs where they are giving away enough training to get hundreds of folks certified at zero cost.

This week I’d like to call your attention to the MS Project Conference
  • For a limited time, the whole conference is $699
  • You can mark down 32 PDUs for this conference (formal classroom sessions are commonly $1500 for this # of PDUs. PMI’s Global Congress costs $1,125 in advance, $1370 on site for a similar 3 day PDU opportunity).
  • You get MS Office Project Pro 2010 for free with the conference (a gift from Project Management Practice Inc. and Keystone Learning Systems).  As we all know, this is a VALUABLE piece of software.
  • You’ll get free online training (again from Project Management Practice Inc. and Keystone Learning Systems), which costs $395 List

Think of it this way.  If you are planning to upgrade your MS Project software anyway, you might as well buy it here and improve your skills for free.  However you think about it, it’s a great deal.


In the interest of disclosure, Microsoft is one of our advertisers and we are sponsoring this conference.  However, this is (of course) something I’d write about either way.
Posted on: August 06, 2009 09:46 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)

What's Your Requirements Architecture Mean to You?

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  

Situation: You want to understand how organizational influences impact your work.

A project starts as an idea.  That idea turns into something more concrete, then goes through cycles of changes – influenced by people, tools, timing, and more.  As new tools are brought in, organizations look at their projects through different lenses and those points of view affect project results.  I think it’s interesting to look at where your organization is focusing on and how its influencing projects.  Understanding your organizational bent can make you more effective within your own sphere of influence.

Is getting what you intended to do - “Done” - most important?
A single software project involving several developers can involve requirements that are complex enough for any project manager.  Of course, there are Software Configuration Management (SCM) tools (What we used to call Version Control Systems) that help development teams manage versions of software and the related changes that are made during the development process.  Project Managers are typically concerned with changes at a higher level – looking at release cycles and business requirements that are more visible to sponsors.  For many companies, this is where requirement tracking stops and they’re happy with it that way.  Jama Software recently came out with a JIRA (defect tracking) connector for their Coutour (requirements management) product that they feel addresses the most critical communications gap that exists in requirements management, bridging developer-speak and PM-speak.  The focus here is on specifying exactly what is needed and verifying that its getting done. (AKA “doing things right”)

Is reviewing what’s being done and refocusing most important?
Add more projects, some spanning various functional areas of the business, and you can create a real management nightmare – even if what you are building is well defined in every case.   Portfolios of projects nearly always create the need for an even higher level of shared understanding between PMs and executive management.  Strategic prioritization efforts influence project requirements in unexpected ways almost as a PPM side effect.  If, as a project manager, you’ve ever been blindsided by a large scale change in plans – you know the impacts here can be huge.  In theory, at a high level the right things are always being done.  (AKA “doing the right things”)

Is optimizing the use of resources most important?
For larger organizations,
we’ve talked about Application Portfolio Management (APM) that aims to reduce the size and maintenance costs of the application portfolio so funds can be put towards new strategic development.  For companies that need a more robust way of tracking incredible complexity and optimizing the use of resources to create strategically important outcomes is most important.   (AKA “doing the right things in the most effective way”)


What does your organization focus on?  Is it driven by new tools being brought in?  Why does it work or not work for you?

Posted on: August 01, 2009 10:51 PM | Permalink | Comments (4)

Free, High-Quality Training?

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  
Situation: You want to turn your jobless stretch into a huge gain.

I'm always skeptical about training 'scholarships'.  So when the folks at ESI brought their program to my attention, I was thinking "here we go again...".  After closer examination however, I think this program is pretty cool - and very generous.
 

Here are the basics of the program:
  • ESI International is offering a $500,000 scholarship program for out-of-work technical professionals. Scholarship funds will cover the majority of U.S. course fees for approved candidates, who may choose up to three courses from ESI’s project management or business analysis curriculum.
  • Courses can be completed at any ESI U.S. public classroom, or via any ESI online learning platform. Courses can be applied toward an associate’s certificate or master’s certificate issued through ESI and partner The George Washington University in Washington, D.C.  GW will award advanced standing toward its Master of Science in Project Management to those who earn a GW/ESI project management master’s certificate and meet other requirements.
  • In addition to the scholarship, ESI has created a career information and source page for technical professionals at www.esi-intl.com/scholarship. The page includes a range of job-hunting resources and the opportunity to have ESI’s vice president of talent management answer visitors’ questions.
  • ESI’s Stand Out Scholarship will run through Dec. 31, or until funds have been exhausted. The program is limited to currently unemployed individuals who are U.S. citizens or permanent residents who show acceptable proof of unemployment.
 
“Despite the current economy, project management as a profession is expected to grow substantially in the next few years with an increasing demand worldwide in such project-intensive industries as manufacturing, pharmaceutical, construction and IT,” said John Elsey, President & CEO, ESI. “This program will allow professionals to keep up their skills in the industry to take advantage of these leading economic opportunities.”
 
There are a few questions we thought you would want answers to right away.  John was kind enough to answer them below...


Q.  Are the candidates selected based on any criteria other than being unemployed?  Or is it first come first served for people who are jobless?  (if there are additional criteria, what’s the best way to get selected?)

John: We wanted to help as many people as possible with ESI’s $500,000 Sta
nd Out Scholarship; keeping the qualification and application process easy was vital in achieving that objective. So as long as someone is unemployed, can show proof of unemployment, and is a US citizen or permanent resident, they are qualified for the scholarship. Awards are issued on a first come, first served basis when the completed application and backup documentation (found at www.esi-intl.com/scholarship <http://www.esi-intl.com/scholarship> ) is emailed to [email protected] or faxed to (703) 558-2261. The only other consideration is that there is space available in the class they’ve selected; if a class is full we’ll work with them to try to find an alternative.


Q.  What are the most popular classes in the project management curriculum? In the business analysis curriculum?

John: We offer more than 30 courses in our
Project Management and Business Analysis. curricula, from entry level to advanced training. These are all eligible under the ESI SOS program.  While our program’s core courses are generally the most popular, the relevancy of the course based on the individual’s experience and skill gap is the most important factor to consider when selecting an appropriate course or program. Many of our courses are offered in the public classroom, e-Training and instructor-led Virtual Classroom formats.


Q.  How many more courses beyond the three would someone have to take to get an Associates or Masters through the program? 

John: With just three courses total someone can earn an Associate’s Certificate in Project Management from ESI and our academic partner The George Washington University. Since people can apply for and take up to three courses with SOS funds, they have the opportunity to quickly and inexpensively earn an impressive certificate which they can add to their resume. Students can earn a Professional Certificate in Business Analysis with a total of just five classes. Or a Master’s Certificate in Project Management with a total of seven courses. Plus, GW will award advanced standing toward its Master of Science in Project Management to those who earn a GW/ESI project management Master’s Certificate and meet other requirements. Our Course Counselors are available to help students determine the best courses to achieve their learning and career objectives.

 
Posted on: July 13, 2009 10:34 AM | Permalink | Comments (3)
ADVERTISEMENTS

"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. "

- Winston Churchill

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors