Project Management

Voices on Project Management

by , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Voices on Project Management offers insights, tips, advice and personal stories from project managers in different regions and industries. The goal is to get you thinking, and spark a discussion. So, if you read something that you agree with--or even disagree with--leave a comment.

About this Blog

RSS

View Posts By:

Cameron McGaughy
Lynda Bourne
Kevin Korterud
Peter Tarhanidis
Conrado Morlan
Jen Skrabak
Mario Trentim
Christian Bisson
Yasmina Khelifi
Sree Rao
Soma Bhattacharya
Emily Luijbregts
David Wakeman
Ramiro Rodrigues
Wanda Curlee
Lenka Pincot
cyndee miller
Jorge Martin Valdes Garciatorres
Marat Oyvetsky

Past Contributors:

Rex Holmlin
Vivek Prakash
Dan Goldfischer
Linda Agyapong
Jim De Piante
Siti Hajar Abdul Hamid
Bernadine Douglas
Michael Hatfield
Deanna Landers
Kelley Hunsberger
Taralyn Frasqueri-Molina
Alfonso Bucero Torres
Marian Haus
Shobhna Raghupathy
Peter Taylor
Joanna Newman
Saira Karim
Jess Tayel
Lung-Hung Chou
Rebecca Braglio
Roberto Toledo
Geoff Mattie

Recent Posts

Project 2030: Skills We Need to Cultivate Now

The Technical Program Manager: How to Stay Relevant in 2025

5 Things Your Operational Plan Should Do

5 New Project Guardrails for Adaptive Leaders

The Leader's Voice: Respect It, Protect It, and Use It Properly!

Categories

2020, Adult Development, Agile, Agile, Agile, agile, Agile management, Agile management, Agile;Community;Talent management, Artificial Intelligence, Backlog, Basics, Benefits Realization, Best Practices, BIM, business acumen, Business Analysis, Business Analysis, Business Case, Business Intelligence, Business Transformation, Calculating Project Value, Canvas, Career Development, Career Development, Career Help, Career Help, Career Help, Career Help, Careers, Careers, Careers, Careers, Categories: Career Help, Change Management, Cloud Computing, Collaboration, Collaboration, Collaboration, Collaboration, Collaboration, Communication, Communication, Communication, Communication, Communications Management, Complexity, Conflict, Conflict Management, Consulting, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Cost Management, COVID-19, Crises, Crisis Management, critical success factors, Cultural Awareness, Culture, Decision Making, Design Thinking, Digital Project Management, Digital Transformation, digital transformation, Digitalisation, Disruption, Diversity, Diversity, Documentation, Earned Value Management, Education, EEWH, Enterprise Risk Management, Escalation management, Estimating, Ethics, execution, Expectations Management, Facilitation, feasibility studies, Future, Future of Project Management, Generational PM, Governance, Government, green building, Growth, Horizontal Development, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Resources, Inclusion, Information Technology, Innovation, Intelligent Building, International, International Development, Internet of Things (IOT), Internet of Things (IoT), IOT, Knowledge, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, Leadership, lean construction, LEED, Lessons Learned, Lessons learned;Retrospective, Managing for Stakeholders, managing stakeholders as clients, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Methodology, Metrics, Micromanagement, Microsoft Project PPM, Motivation, Negotiation, Neuroscience, neuroscience, New Practitioners, Nontraditional Project Management, OKR, Online Learning, opportunity, Organizational Culture, Organizational Project Management, Pandemic, People management, Planing, planning, PM & the Economy, PM History, PM Think About It, PMBOK Guide, PMI, PMI EMEA 2018, PMI EMEA Congress 2017, PMI EMEA Congress 2019, PMI Global Conference 2017, PMI Global Conference 2018, PMI Global Conference 2019, PMI Global Congress 2010 - North America, PMI Global Congress 2011 - EMEA, PMI Global Congress 2011 - North America, PMI Global Congress 2012 - EMEA, PMI Global Congress 2012 - North America, PMI Global Congress 2013 - EMEA, PMI Global Congress 2013 - North America, PMI Global Congress 2014 - EMEA, PMI Global Congress 2014 - North America, PMI GLobal Congress EMEA 2018, PMI PMO Symposium 2012, PMI PMO Symposium 2013, PMI PMO Symposium 2015, PMI PMO Symposium 2016, PMI PMO Symposium 2017, PMI PMO Symposium 2018, PMI Pulse of the Profession, PMO, PMO, pmo, PMO Project Management Office, portfolio, Portfolio Management, Portfolio Management, portfolio management, presentations, Priorities, Probability, Problem Structuring Methods, Process, Procurement Management, profess, Program Management, project, Project Delivery, Project Dependencies, Project Failure, project failure, Project Leadership, Project Management, project management, project management office, Project Planning, project planning, Project Requirements, Project Success, Ransomware, Reflections on the PM Life, Remote, Remote Work, Requirements Management, Research Conference 2010, Researching the Value of Project Management, Resiliency, Risk Management, Risk Management, Risk management, risk management, ROI, Roundtable, Salary Survey, Schedule Management, Scheduling, Scope Management, Scrum, search, SelfLeadership, SelfLeadership, SelfLeadership, SelfLeadership, SelfLeadership, Servant Leadership, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Social Responsibility, Sponsorship, Stakeholder Management, Stakeholder Management, stakeholder management, Strategy, Strategy, swot, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management, Talent Management Leadership SelfLeadership Collaboration Communication, Taskforce, Teams, Teams in Agile, Teams in Agile, teamwork, Tech, Technical Debt, Technology, TED Talks, The Project Economy, Timeline, Tools, tools, Transformation, transformation, Transition, Trust, Value, Vertical Development, Volunteering, Volunteering #Leadership #SelfLeadership, Volunteering Sharing Knowledge Leadership SelfLeadership Collaboration Trust, VUCA, Women in PM, Women in Project Management

Date

Digging Deeper into a PMO Implementation Plan

Categories: PMO

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  
In my last post, we discussed the five basics of a PMO implementation plan. Here, I'll delve deeper into those five: 

1. Current State Assessment

When assessing the current state, it might be helpful to hire an external consultancy, as internal initiatives may lose momentum along the way. The people internal to an organization might not be able to ask the right questions or they might even resist due to a fear of change. An external consultancy can assist in overcoming political issues by adopting a structured approach. Usually, consultants force or drive change because that's what they are hired to do. In the end, a good diagnosis will point out issues and opportunities for improvement. 

2. Future State Vision

Based on the assessment, it is possible to design a future state vision, describing how projects, programs and portfolios should be managed in order to fulfill organizational needs. That's because when the current state is clearly understood, it is easy to compare to benchmarks. Consequently, the organization can realize what is missing or what is done but could be improved. Ultimately, the future state vision details exactly what the organization wants to become.

3. Gap Analysis

The next step is to carry out a gap analysis by comparing the current state to the future vision. This analysis has to focus on three factors: 

  • What is desirable? 
  • What is effective?
  • What is feasible?
A successful gap analysis clearly identifies what is missing or what could be improved, prioritizing which features, processes and structure the PMO should have, according to effectiveness (cost x benefit), desirability (sponsorship; what the company want to implement) and feasibility (what is realistic and what is possible to do). We have to select and prioritize based on cultural and organizational feasibility, not only based on resources available.

For example, imagine an organization wants to implement enterprise project management (EPM) software. There are plenty of options in the market. Some have fancy features and are more expensive. It might be desirable to have top-notch software, so we won't have to substitute or upgrade it for years. However, it is effective to choose software that offers the simplest solution and satisfies future state needs. Finally, it might be feasible to start with familiar software to overcome people's resistance and rejection to the PMO implementation.

In this particular case, project professionals might desire the best EPM in the world (desirability) -- but the company could do well with a free version or simpler software (effectiveness). Finally, considering that people unfamiliar with project management practices will have to use the software, it might make sense to get something familiar or similar to other software they already use (feasibility).

4. Implementation Strategy

After the gap analysis, introduce stakeholder requirements to define the implementation strategy. I recommend thinking of the PMO like a new business unit or a small new company. The PMO should have its own mission, vision and goals. We have to identify who are its stakeholders and customers, so we can define its value proposition and its services. Personally, I use the Business Model Generation canvas to do that.

The implementation strategy defines the approach to implement a PMO, major expected results and the overall framework, considering organizational strategy and corporate project management governance. Consequently, the PMO business model must support and enhance strategic alignment by selecting, prioritizing and managing portfolios of projects that sustain and boost organizational strategy.

5. Implementation Plan

Finally, the implementation plan is the detailed project management plan for implementing the PMO. While the implementation strategy is the approach chosen to implement the PMO, the implementation plan puts that strategy into action. 

We start by defining its scope and work breakdown structure. Then we create a schedule of tasks to deliver the project scope. Resource needs are identified and a budget is set. Other subsidiary plans are created to manage integration, scope, time, cost, quality, communications, human resources, risks, procurement and stakeholders. 

The implementation plan should be as detailed as you need. I want to emphasize the importance of defining a business model for your PMO, allowing for performance measurement and improvement after the implementation. 

In my next post, I'll provide a framework for sustaining and improving your PMO, once it is set up and running. Do you have any tips or examples of PMO implementation plans? 

Posted by Mario Trentim on: February 21, 2014 09:50 AM | Permalink | Comments (2)

Keep the Schedule Plan Strong -- and Constraint-Free

Categories: Project Planning

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  
The project schedule plan is probably one of the most important project management assets a project manager has to develop, maintain and manage throughout a project. Why? Because compared to other planning documents -- such as the resources plan, costs plan or risk management plan -- a project schedule will generally have widespread visibility within the project's environment and among stakeholders.

For instance, your project sponsors will want to see your project schedule and understand whether you are on track to deliver it on time. The beneficiaries of your project will want to see it to understand your next deliverables or key milestones. Your core project team will seek it out to find out how work activities are planned and relate to one another, and how resources are allocated. And, probably most important, you as the project manager will need it to be your map throughout the project, guiding you to drive the project to its target. 

Now, if your project schedule is incomplete or flawed -- for example, it's missing work tasks or it features wrong dependencies between project tasks -- you will most likely steer your project into a wall. And even if you put everything right into it (i.e., all work activities, the right durations, right resources assigned, right dependencies), that still might not be sufficient for a successful delivery. That's because, as you know, a project schedule is not a linear sequencing of work tasks that perform exactly as initially planned.

In addition, your project schedule will be subject to the project's challenges and constraints, such as resources scarcity, work overload, aggressive milestones or delays. It's these unexpected or imposed factors that will constrain your project schedule and demand that you react quickly, applying various tactics and techniques, to adapt the project schedule and make it ultimately work.

There are several techniques that can help in analyzing, adapting and improving a constrained project schedule. Among these, three stand out for their effectiveness:

  1. Resource leveling, to be used when you have resource constraints or are aiming for more efficient and effective resources utilization 
  2. Schedule crashing, for reducing tasks' duration by applying multiple or better resources to the same tasks
  3. Fast-tracking, to reduce the project duration by overlapping tasks that otherwise would have been sequential and dependent on one another

In my next post, I'll dive deeper into what these three techniques are, when to apply them and how to do so.

How do you manage constraints to your project schedule?

Posted by Marian Haus on: February 19, 2014 10:17 AM | Permalink | Comments (1)

Procurement: A Project Manager's Best Friend

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  
We all agree that projects need things. These things can run the gamut, from pencils to gas turbines. In the past, the corporate function that acquired things for projects was called "purchasing." Its sole role was to do what the title implies — purchase things. As corporate governance evolved, so did the purchasing department into what we now know as procurement.

Today, procurement has to orchestrate the acquisition of hundreds, if not thousands, of things for projects on a daily basis. In addition, this department puts in place policies that keep project managers from purchasing a gas turbine when they need only a pencil.
  
Traditionally, project managers have viewed procurement departments as a barrier to progress and a constant source of frustration. However, this friction can sometimes be the fault of the project manager, who's not practicing good stakeholder management with procurement team members. 

As with any other stakeholder, team members from procurement need to be an integral part of the project team. Let's look at ways to make this happen, as well as the benefits of doing so: 

  1. Share the big picture. Project managers tend to assume that procurement team members already have deep knowledge of the things they need to acquire for the project. Even with procurement departments dividing acquisition activities into product categories, it's nearly impossible for procurement team members to know everything about their product category. To enable a smooth acquisition process, share the objectives, scope and schedule for the project with them. By clearly understanding the needs of the project, the procurement team can be more effective in acquiring things for the project in a timely and effective manner.  
  2. Clear division of responsibilities. As part of the project, procurement team members need to understand their roles and connection points with other team members. This understanding of others' roles is essential so that the procurement team members know what and with whom to execute acquisition activities. In addition, it is also essential to discuss the best way to engage suppliers with procurement team members, as a poor supplier engagement process can adversely impact the project budget, costs and resulting benefits. A good side effect of discussing vendors together is that the project manager and procurement team members work closely and keep each other informed of acquisition progress and potential issues.   
  3. Recognition as a key team member. Acquisition activities on projects can involve both short-term consumables (e.g., printer paper, temporary office space, etc.), as well as long-term capital investments (e.g., software and hardware). Especially in the latter case, the activities of procurement team members can have a substantial influence on the outcome of the project. When organizing the project, ensure that procurement members are a visible and engaged part of the team that reports to the project manager. They should also be included in project team meetings and project work plan, and contribute to the project status report. 

By adopting these practices, you can better leverage the specialized skills of procurement team members — and you just might be able to acquire both pencils and turbines in a manner that will keep your project on schedule.

What methods can you recommend to help integrate procurement into your project team? 

Posted by Kevin Korterud on: February 12, 2014 05:31 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)

Five Basics of a PMO Implementation Plan

Categories: PMO

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  
I often say that establishing a project management office (PMO) is not for the faint of heart. It is a very difficult endeavor -- not just because it involves advanced knowledge, but also because it challenges status quo in the organization. 

In my previous post, we discussed The Must-Haves of Establishing a PMO. Now we are going one step further by laying out an implementation plan. Implementing a PMO involves five basic -- but essential -- sets of decisions:

1. Current State Assessment

  • How many projects do we have today, and how are they being managed?
  • Are their results satisfactory? 
  • Do we really need a PMO? 
  • What type of PMO?
2. Future State Vision

  • What functions will be performed by the PMO?
  • What results do we expect from the implementation?
3. Gap Analysis

  • What do we have right now in terms of project governance, methodology, infrastructure, human resources and software?
  • What do we need to implement a PMO that delivers the expected results?
  • How are we going to handle change management, stakeholder expectations and cultural aspects?
4. Implementation Strategy 

  • What is the scope of the implementation?
  • What are the barriers, enablers and risks of this implementation, and how are we going to deal with them?
  • Are we going to hire a consultancy?
  • Do we start a small pilot and grow it through quick wins? Or do we set up for global, company-wide implementation?
  • What are the implementation's critical success factors?
5. Implementation Plan

  • What is our roadmap for implementation?
  • What are the implementation's phases and key milestones?
  • How many resources do we need? 
  • How much will the implementation cost?
  • How do we guarantee the PMO's sustainability? How are we going to measure its performance and improve it?
Not following these steps can result in serious problems. For example, if we don't conduct a gap analysis, we will probably end up with an unfeasible plan, disconnected from reality. 

I once participated in a PMO implementation that was doomed to fail under the original plan. The future state vision was nearly impossible to reach, considering the current state of the organization. While conducting the gap analysis, it became clear that we should lower our expectations to implement that PMO. In that particular case, it was necessary to implement a rudimentary PMO to kick-start a cultural change to embrace project management. That was the chosen implementation strategy, which led to a feasible implementation plan supported by key stakeholders.

In my next post, we'll dive deeper into these five steps with best practices and examples on how to carry them out. 

What other questions do you think are helpful to ask of your organization when building a PMO implementation plan? 

Posted by Mario Trentim on: February 06, 2014 10:13 AM | Permalink | Comments (5)

8 Steps for Better Listening

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  
In my last post, I discussed the benefits of learning to listen. Here, I will share easy, actionable steps to help develop your listening skills. While going through the steps below, please remember, listening more and talking less are two sides of the same communication coin. 

  1. Start your discussion by praising the other person who has just finished talking, even if you disagree with him or her. Normally we do not disagree with all the points of the other person, but we tend to ignore the points of agreement. Starting with praise will help you listen to the other person completely, and you will be compelled to try to find points where you agree rather than disagree.
  2. Remember that more talkative people spill more information, and that can be used against them. As talkative people listen less, their questions also often go unanswered. When you are aware that you may be providing unnecessary information to others, you'll make an effort to speak about only what is necessary. 
  3. Better listeners get more information from others, which they can use to fine-tune their point of view and present it more effectively. When you're eager to improve your thoughts, you listen more carefully, because that helps you strategize. Listening will make you a better negotiator.
  4. Write down points of agreement and disagreement. When you write down the points, you have little option but to listen. 
  5. If you do not get the opportunity to talk, the sky will not fall. Moreover, it is of little use talking in a forum that does not give all participants an opportunity to present their point of view. Most of the time, when someone says, "Listen to me," the opposite happens.
  6. Don't try to win the speaking contest. Instead, focus on winning the hearts of the people by understanding them. Many times, more talkative people appear to win the battle, but they lose the war. More talkative people do not converse, but instead force their viewpoint on others. This creates a negative perception of such a person that sustains beyond the conversation and impacts the overall relationship. 
  7. Establish simple, fair rules. In a group, ground rules help create an environment of listening. For example, solicit opinions one at a time, give everyone two minutes to put up their points in round-robin fashion, or ask that everyone reiterate the previous speaker's point of view before making his or her own. 
  8. Take an example from the deaf. I will leave you with a thought from A Comma in a Sentence by Indian businessman and author R. Gopalakrishnan, in which he gains a valuable perspective from hearing-impaired teacher Bruno Kahne. The book paraphrases Mr. Kahne: "Deaf people look at the speaker in the eye and make sure they are fully present in the interaction. They absorb more and retain more. In many management situations...there are simultaneous and multiple conversations. That will never happen with deaf people. They follow a strict protocol of one person speaking at a time. Consensus and agreement are reached faster than out of a heated and overlapping conversation. In the long term, slower is faster. Deaf people are direct and they communicate with their thoughts and feelings.... They are economical about the way they communicate. For the same reason, they listen well, too."

What is your top tip for becoming a good listener? 

Read PMI's The Essential Role of Communications to learn more about effective communication.
Posted by Vivek Prakash on: February 02, 2014 09:22 PM | Permalink | Comments (1)
ADVERTISEMENTS

"It isn't necessary to be rich and famous to be happy. It's only necessary to be rich."

- Alan Alda

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors