Viewing Posts by Peter Tarhanidis
The Customer Is Always Digital—So Make the Experience Right
|
By Peter Tarhanidis New and proliferating digital technologies are giving rise to new competitive businesses while transforming legacy organizations. It’s no longer just about the Internet, but increasingly tech-savvy users and inexpensive smartphones and tablets. From an organizational perspective, it’s not just a matter of grappling with new technical platforms: The relationship between organizations and their customers is being transformed. Before, the cornerstone of customer service was the golden rule: treat your customers the way you want to be treated. Customer relationships were facilitated and managed within just a few departments. Disruptive technologies have enabled a shift to a new paradigm: customer empowerment. This ushered in the new platinum rule: treat your customers the way they want to be treated. Disruptive technologies integrate organizations to their digital customer experience and are simultaneously influenced by social, consumer and professional media portals like Facebook, Yelp, NetPromoter Scores, and LinkedIn. Now, much of the work and measurement of this activity is shared across the entire supply chain of the customer journey, which requires more cross-team collaboration to report on the customer experience. So the importation question has become: How can we make the digital customer experience flawless? This is the new competitive differentiator for companies. Those that stand apart in this respect build market leverage. Project managers are one asset organizations have at their disposal to ensure success with this new digital customer experience dynamic. Here’s a four-stop roadmap for optimizing your organization for the brave new digital world we all live in.
How is your organization adapting to the new realities of our digital customer age? Please take a moment and share your thoughts. |
To Develop Project Managers, You Have to Understand How Adults Learn
| By Peter Tarhanidis Many organizations rely on traditional curriculum-based learning to develop project leaders. However, such approaches are deeply rooted in pedagogy—the teaching of children. Even though top managers at many organizations invest in traditional project management curricula, these courses have limited utility for adult project managers, slowing down the organization from reaching goals. In my experience, organizations tend to employ disparate training methodologies while teams dive into execution with little planning. With scattered approaches to talent management and knowledge transfer, they miss project goals. All this creates an opportunity for an enterprise-wide approach that integrates contemporary adult learning and development practices. Leveraging this approach allows the organization to motivate and sustain increased individual and project performance to achieve the organization’s strategic plan. In coming up with such an approach, organizations should consider several adult learning and development theories. For example, consider Malcolm Knowles’ six aspects of successful adult learning: self-directed learning, building experiences, developing social networks, the practicability of using new knowledge, the internal drive to want to understand why, and how to use new knowledge. And they must also keep in mind how the aging project management workforce of project managers drives organizational performance. Other considerations include:
Try these eight steps to build a more flexible and integrated adult learning framework.
New integrative learning approaches are required to increase project managers’ competence while motivating and sustaining older adult learners. By applying these practices to critical needed competencies, organizations can create new capabilities to meet their strategic plans. |
Drive Success With a Decision-Making Process Built on Consensus By Peter Tarhanidis
| Organizations are constantly transforming their operating models and processes and investing in new technologies to achieve their business strategy. While project leaders are focusing on executing that strategy through the discipline of project management, they are also navigating complex environments and undefined hierarchies. In some cases, initiatives stall until a path forward is agreed upon.
Establishing a decision-making process to reach consensus early in projects will ensure higher success rates. To determine a decision-making process, start by assessing the following four tensions:
I used this assessment approach on a recent project to ensure stakeholder and team alignment. I was able to define a procure-to-pay process that fit the culture of the organization, and stakeholders subscribed to it. I also was able to assign decision rights across the project budget so that the suppliers and the project team would collaborate constructively during trade-off discussions and maintain the project scope. Next, to maintain budget adherence I aligned contract and payment policies to our suppliers’ practices to validate terms, work in progress and work completed against estimates. Lastly, I was able to ensure that changes to the project scope and budget were clearly a result of sponsor-requested alterations and not due to scope mismanagement. Looking at these four tensions helped me identify decision-making criteria that drove team collaboration, transparency in project drivers, and alignment with sponsors to meet the strategic plan. As teams endure increasing change initiatives or complex programs, many varied stakeholders will need to be engaged to ensure consensus. Of course, project leaders can determine what other approaches exist to drive consensus early in the project initiation phase. Some examples to leverage might include:
Being aware of tensions in the decision-making process and operating structures allows project leaders to succeed in building consensus to achieve organizational goals with less complexity. |
Building Maturity, Battling Complexity
Categories:
Complexity
Categories: Complexity
|
Today's marketplace and customers make new demands that fuel complexities in our organizations through a number of external factors. These factors require an organization to become agile to meet the new demands. In many cases the external factors include:
But beyond external factors, the first and most important issue of complexity is determining the structure of our project management system. This includes the level of project supply and the rate at which they can be staffed by skilled project resources. PMI's 2012 Executive Guide to Project Management showed that over time, those who matured project management in their organization improved their outcomes as depicted in the graph below.
So while it's clear that mature project management practices are beneficial to success, how can an organization build this capacity and resources? Many are prone to take them from more mature industries. For example, as the supply of projects increase, organizations are trying to poach IT project managers or even an SME as the project lead. It is expected that the leaders roll out the new initiative while they may not have knowledge in structured delivery approaches. So what choices do we have in balancing the complex level of supply and the rate of demand for project managers?
My thoughts on what choices we have here are below. They include two traditional options on controlling the level of work and the rate of staffing skilled workers. I'm also offering a third and more innovative perspective, for those who want to increase their agility by changing their management culture.
Option 1 (traditional):
Description: Control the level of the supply and reduce the project intake to focus on fewer initiatives.
Considerations:
Option 2 (traditional):
Description: Increase the rate of new projects launched and hire more project managers.
Considerations:
Option 3 (innovative):
Description: Effect a change in corporate cultures by committing the organization to increase project management disciplines across all employees.
Considerations:
Which choice represents your organization's preference: to follow the traditional options, or is it time for a cultural change? Explore PMI's Change Management Resources.
|
Turn Chaos Into Success
Categories:
Complexity
Categories: Complexity
| Project managers usually advance in their careers by managing small, then medium and ultimately large projects. What project managers may not be prepared for is the complexity that comes with taking on bigger projects. Left unmanaged, this complexity leads to chaos and ultimately project failure. Why does this happen? A business system is characterized by processes and activities that work in tandem to deliver a specific result that benefits customers. Throughout a project's life cycle, it can encounter a number of business systems -- such as leadership systems (how leaders set values and organizational performance and governance) and customer systems (engagement strategy to meet customer needs and support that relationship) -- that independently and jointly put pressure on the project. As you segment the business systems further, you will find underlying, interrelated business processes and activities that create even more complexity. And as the project traverses along the value chain, more strategic tensions apply, such as competing research and development priorities or sales quotas. Projects that disrupt these systems and value chains promise new and improved approaches. But project managers must mediate the chaos this disruption generates to achieve project success. Organizations with less mature processes and fewer performance measures tend to put more pressure on project teams. In these organizations, the project team is responsible for navigating the chaos caused by increased complexity. Projects often devolve into uphill battles and ultimately fail. This demonstrates an inherent "inverse tension" between process maturity and project complexity. Reduce complexity by relaxing tensions. By understanding tensions, project managers can develop a management discipline that shapes the project plan and enables success. To create that discipline, follow these foundational steps:
I use APQC's Process Framework as one source to identify common organization business systems and processes, and their potential pitfalls. A team should identify the system's performance gaps to manage mediations and avoid negative impacts proactively. To assess the performance of business systems, I generally rely on the CMMI model (Capability Maturity Model Integration). I define the performance criteria according to the following maturity levels:
I also use simple checklists to assess the project capability of an organization and team to determine any preventative actions I can take in the planning phase. For example, asking a series of assessment questions that identify process maturity levels allows me to consider any gaps I need to mitigate to improve project performance. To analyze team-related project complexity, I leverage the characteristics outlined by U.S. authors Kathleen B. Hass and Amit Kumar:
I used these frameworks to reduce complexity and increase predictability when I managed a big project team that was working with a large number of suppliers. The project was highly complex, behind schedule and expected to go over budget. The team managed supplier payments by sending invoices to accounts payable once the related work was complete. Using assessment questions, I discovered the main problem was related to a large global transformation initiative, in which the purchasing team worked within limited regional relationships. I classified this as a high complex engagement because the team:
In my management improvement plan, I was able to clearly demonstrate what business system was failing, where in the system it was located and why it was underperforming. I created a clear path forward to restore performance, which resulted in reduced complexity, better alignment and lower costs. How do you create a framework to get a handle on complexity? Learn more about complexity on PMI.org. |







