Project Management

Please login or join to subscribe to this thread

Is PMI a "new" organization?

linkedin twitter facebook  
avatar
Stelian ROMAN Project Manager| MicroSafety Carlingford, New South Wales, Australia
I am sure that by now everyone noticed the new PMI brand and other related changes, like new look and new platforms for the PMI websites.
In the age of Agile when rapid change is the only constant the PMI rebranding is a good indication that PMI's and his leadership is adapting to the 21st century.
I see PMI as a guild that should provide guidance to the project management community as a whole, a community that like any other communities may be afraid of change. Agility is good but each person and/or organization has different needs and appetite. What PMI and us, the "simple" members should do to keep what was good with the "old" PMI: the prestige of the PMI brand, the PMI certifications and PMI standards of practice?
Sort By:
< 1 2 >
avatar
Luis Branco CEO| Business Insight, Consultores de Gestão, Ldª Carcavelos, Lisboa, Portugal
Dear Stelian
Should we continue to refer to the Project Management Institute as PMI?
Looking at the rebrandig I say no.
In the new logo nothing tells me PMI
Let us take advantage of the PMI certifications and PMI standards of practice for now.
With the acquisition of DA and FLEX what will come?
avatar
Thomas Walenta Global Project Economy Expert Hackenheim, Germany
Stelia, I would rather characterize it as a 'living' organization.
Panta Rhei.
...
1 reply by Stelian ROMAN
Oct 12, 2019 6:28 AM
Stelian ROMAN
...
@Thomas, It was very alive. The 50 years anniversary it's a good indication of continuous evolution. I don't know many other brands that are 50 years old....
avatar
Stelian ROMAN Project Manager| MicroSafety Carlingford, New South Wales, Australia
Oct 12, 2019 5:40 AM
Replying to Thomas Walenta
...
Stelia, I would rather characterize it as a 'living' organization.
Panta Rhei.
@Thomas, It was very alive. The 50 years anniversary it's a good indication of continuous evolution. I don't know many other brands that are 50 years old....
avatar
Kavitha Gunasekaran Project Manager| Aerospace & Defence Organisation Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
In the 50 year period, the most important change is that today we have Project Managers belonging to 3-generations. So re-branding would in my opinion be inclusive and appeal to the entire spectrum of PMs.
avatar
Vincent Guerard Coach - Trainer - Speaker - Advisor| Freelance Mont-Royal, Quebec, Canada
Stelian,
Rebranding is hopefully just a project in a large program to modernize PMI. Make it more international, more accessible, easier to search a source of documentation pro members......
Check the other discussions on ReBranding

https://www.projectmanagement.com/discussi...-new-PMI-brand-

https://www.projectmanagement.com/discussi...d-Business-Case
avatar
Kiron Bondale Retired | Mentor| Retired Welland, Ontario, Canada
That's a great question - when introducing a change, we need to respect the past (of our stakeholders) so they will be willing to let us lead them to the future.

If we think about where PMI was for the first 50 years of its journey, it was about elevating the profession and creating credibility in the role of the PM. By having the word "Project" in bold typeface, the brand team continues to highlight the core focus of the Institute even though the symbols and colors are more modern.

Kiron
avatar
Drew Craig Sr. Agile & Product Coach| Vanguard Philadelphia, Pa, United States
Simply b/c we got some new hammers, does not negate the credibility and effectiveness of the old hammers. They can all be used together in harmony, while still maintaining a certain level of specificity depending on the job.

And Kiron highlights an important aspect of the brand, that the word 'Project' is in bold typeface.
avatar
Stelian ROMAN Project Manager| MicroSafety Carlingford, New South Wales, Australia
@Kiron. That's my fear: that we throw the baby out with the bathwater. most of my projects are part of enterprise transformation. I've seen too many mistakes. Project managers forced to become Scrum Masters or sacked as too 'old'. All Agile frameworks are developed by people that are now close to retirement. In my humble opinion it is hard to understand Agile without a solid knowledge of planned approaches.
I believe that the PMP segmentation between adaptive /Hybrid/Predictive is the right way and should also be reflected in the transformation strategy.
avatar
Stelian ROMAN Project Manager| MicroSafety Carlingford, New South Wales, Australia
@Andrew. My experience is that organisations discarded the old 'hammers' when they bought the shiny ones. Now after failing to become 'Agile' many are looking for the old and they can't find them... PMI should bring all the 'hammers' together.
...
1 reply by Drew Craig
Oct 12, 2019 6:04 PM
Drew Craig
...
Agreed. Our job is to bring solutions to customers and help the to get where they need to be, regardless of which hammer is needed, or whatever combination.
avatar
Drew Craig Sr. Agile & Product Coach| Vanguard Philadelphia, Pa, United States
Oct 12, 2019 5:45 PM
Replying to Stelian ROMAN
...
@Andrew. My experience is that organisations discarded the old 'hammers' when they bought the shiny ones. Now after failing to become 'Agile' many are looking for the old and they can't find them... PMI should bring all the 'hammers' together.
Agreed. Our job is to bring solutions to customers and help the to get where they need to be, regardless of which hammer is needed, or whatever combination.
< 1 2 >

Please login or join to reply

Content ID:
ADVERTISEMENTS

"But the fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown."

- Carl Sagan

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors