Program Manager, PPM&PMO Specialist.| Coppel, Mexico.Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico
Colleagues let’s continue riding the World Cup wave with our next big topic: Squad Selection.
In the World Cup, national managers have the luxury of scanning the entire country to pick the absolute best, most elite talent to build a highly effective "Dream Team." They get the perfect striker, the best goalkeeper, and total commitment.
But let’s be honest—in project management, building our squad is rarely that easy! We often face major talent shortages, tight budgets, or matrix organizations where we have to constantly negotiate and "fight" for people's time.
What is your biggest difficulty when trying to get the right talent for your projects?
PM Consultant| CLOUD SAFE CO., LTD.New Taipei City, NWT, Taiwan
Love the World Cup analogy!
In my experience, the reality often hits right at the intersection of both talent scarcity and matrix organizational struggles. Finding highly specialized talent—like experts in cloud architecture or security compliance—is already a massive challenge. But even when you do identify that perfect 'striker' for your technical initiative, navigating a matrix organization to actually secure their bandwidth is a whole different ball game. You are constantly negotiating against competing departmental priorities just to get a fraction of their time.
It really forces us to shift our strategy. Rather than relying solely on the superstar player, we should focus on cross-training the team and building resilient workflows that don't depend on a single key individual.
Great topic that perfectly captures the daily reality of resource management!
...
1 reply by Francisco Herrera
Jun 30, 2026 5:01 PM
Francisco Herrera
...
Chia thanks for this fantastic insight! You hit the nail on the head—sometimes negotiating for that 'striker' in a matrix orgatnization feels harder than the project itself.
I like your solution: focusing on cross-training the squad rather than relying on a single superstar. That is exactly how you build a resilient team capable of winning the whole tournament. Brilliant contribution!
Francisco
Saving Changes...
Luis BrancoCEO| Business Insight, Consultores de Gestão, LdªCarcavelos, Lisboa, Portugal
One of the biggest challenges I encounter is not identifying the right talent, but securing and retaining access to that talent throughout the project lifecycle.
In many organizations, particularly matrix environments, the most capable people are often assigned to multiple initiatives simultaneously. As a result, availability becomes just as important as competence. A highly skilled resource who is only partially available may create more risk than a less experienced team member who can fully commit to the project.
What I have learned over the years is that project success rarely depends on assembling the "best" individuals. In football, talent selection is often the starting point. In projects, value is more frequently created through coordination, trust, complementary capabilities, and the ability to work effectively under changing conditions.
Many projects struggle because resource allocation is treated as an optimization problem, while in reality it is often a balancing act between competing priorities, limited capacity, and evolving business needs.
Technical expertise is certainly important, but it is rarely sufficient on its own. Motivation, collaboration, adaptability, stakeholder support, and a shared commitment to project outcomes can have an equally significant impact on success.
Perhaps that is one of the key differences between a World Cup squad and a project team. National managers search for the best players available. Project leaders must often create the conditions for people to perform at their best together.
In my experience, the most successful project leaders were not necessarily those who had access to the strongest players. They were the ones who transformed a group of individuals into a coherent team capable of delivering value under real-world constraints.
That is where the real challenge, and the real leadership opportunity, begins.
...
1 reply by Francisco Herrera
Jul 03, 2026 3:23 PM
Francisco Herrera
...
Luis you framed the difference perfectly: while a World Cup manager simply selects the best players, a project leader must create the conditions for the team to perform together. Your point about availability versus competence is spot on—a fully committed team member is often much less risky than a distracted superstar. Outstanding contribution! Francisco
Senior IS Project Manager| Baycare Health SystemsClearwater, Fl, United States
So far the World Cup has been a great viewing experience!
As a Project Manager - I find that for all of my projects I am assigned to team members that will work with me, i have no input into who will be assigned to my specific project.
For an organizational point of view, resource allocation can be a big challenge, we often have more work then time to complete it (anyone agree)?
...
1 reply by Francisco Herrera
Jul 09, 2026 7:12 PM
Francisco Herrera
...
Michael yes having more work than time is our permanent reality.
It is a classic PM challenge: we rarely get to choose our 'squad,' so we have to focus on coaching and motivating the players we are given. Thanks for bringing this realistic constraint to the table! Francisco
Program Manager, PPM&PMO Specialist.| Coppel, Mexico.Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico
Jun 18, 2026 2:46 AM
Replying to Chia Fang Chang
...
Love the World Cup analogy!
In my experience, the reality often hits right at the intersection of both talent scarcity and matrix organizational struggles. Finding highly specialized talent—like experts in cloud architecture or security compliance—is already a massive challenge. But even when you do identify that perfect 'striker' for your technical initiative, navigating a matrix organization to actually secure their bandwidth is a whole different ball game. You are constantly negotiating against competing departmental priorities just to get a fraction of their time.
It really forces us to shift our strategy. Rather than relying solely on the superstar player, we should focus on cross-training the team and building resilient workflows that don't depend on a single key individual.
Great topic that perfectly captures the daily reality of resource management!
Chia thanks for this fantastic insight! You hit the nail on the head—sometimes negotiating for that 'striker' in a matrix orgatnization feels harder than the project itself.
I like your solution: focusing on cross-training the squad rather than relying on a single superstar. That is exactly how you build a resilient team capable of winning the whole tournament. Brilliant contribution!
Program Manager, PPM&PMO Specialist.| Coppel, Mexico.Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico
Jun 18, 2026 4:11 AM
Replying to Luis Branco
...
One of the biggest challenges I encounter is not identifying the right talent, but securing and retaining access to that talent throughout the project lifecycle.
In many organizations, particularly matrix environments, the most capable people are often assigned to multiple initiatives simultaneously. As a result, availability becomes just as important as competence. A highly skilled resource who is only partially available may create more risk than a less experienced team member who can fully commit to the project.
What I have learned over the years is that project success rarely depends on assembling the "best" individuals. In football, talent selection is often the starting point. In projects, value is more frequently created through coordination, trust, complementary capabilities, and the ability to work effectively under changing conditions.
Many projects struggle because resource allocation is treated as an optimization problem, while in reality it is often a balancing act between competing priorities, limited capacity, and evolving business needs.
Technical expertise is certainly important, but it is rarely sufficient on its own. Motivation, collaboration, adaptability, stakeholder support, and a shared commitment to project outcomes can have an equally significant impact on success.
Perhaps that is one of the key differences between a World Cup squad and a project team. National managers search for the best players available. Project leaders must often create the conditions for people to perform at their best together.
In my experience, the most successful project leaders were not necessarily those who had access to the strongest players. They were the ones who transformed a group of individuals into a coherent team capable of delivering value under real-world constraints.
That is where the real challenge, and the real leadership opportunity, begins.
Luis you framed the difference perfectly: while a World Cup manager simply selects the best players, a project leader must create the conditions for the team to perform together. Your point about availability versus competence is spot on—a fully committed team member is often much less risky than a distracted superstar. Outstanding contribution! Francisco Saving Changes...
Program Manager, PPM&PMO Specialist.| Coppel, Mexico.Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico
Jun 24, 2026 3:04 PM
Replying to Michael King
...
So far the World Cup has been a great viewing experience!
As a Project Manager - I find that for all of my projects I am assigned to team members that will work with me, i have no input into who will be assigned to my specific project.
For an organizational point of view, resource allocation can be a big challenge, we often have more work then time to complete it (anyone agree)?
Michael yes having more work than time is our permanent reality.
It is a classic PM challenge: we rarely get to choose our 'squad,' so we have to focus on coaching and motivating the players we are given. Thanks for bringing this realistic constraint to the table! Francisco Saving Changes...