Project Management

Project Success: What is Critical?

From the PM-Interface Blog
by
The PM Interface is a place for discussions, insights, and personal experiences related to project management. Here you'll find articles with an interesting perspective relating to a variety of PM topics. Please leave a comment, or disagreement. Your feedback is valuable.

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

Hiatus: completing a degree

Three Surefire Ways to Improve Your Presentation, and Engage Your Audience

Are You Communicating? Three out of Five Leaders aren't, but They Think They Are!

I Miss the Cold War

PMI Global Congress - Day III (Last Day: Climbing to the Summit & Goodbyes)

Categories

Business, Communications Management, Leadership, Leadership Summit, PMI Global Congress, PMP Exam, Presentations, Project Success, Region 7, Risk Management, Strategy, Systems, Talent Triangle, Volunteering

Date

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  


By Mike Adams, PMP®

VP Education - PMI Otowi Bridge

I recently read a question on the projectmanagement.com discussion forum by a student asking for insight from project managers about what are the most important factors in project success.

Responses were interesting, thoughtful, and thought provoking. I began to reflect on my experiences as a project manager and on projects I’ve seen, both successful and unsuccessful. In my career, I’ve managed construction projects, and technology projects alike. I’ve worked on many teams, with many types of personalities.

Through all of that, I’ve observed a few constants. A few things that seem critical to project success. Comments touched on all of them, but one stands out for me. The common thread, the thing without which nothing else works seems to be masterful communication. A successful PM needs not only the ability to succinctly communicate details, but they also need to be facile with interpersonal communication. They must be able to communicate in a way that causes buy-in from others. I’ve seen many PMs rely on the application of authority in an attempt to force the success of their project. This can produce results for a short window in a crunch, but it carries significant costs.

Eighteen years ago, I was a laborer on a construction site. The contractor was smart, knowledgeable, and driven. He could focus on the goal of his project with LASER like precision. He was capable of pushing himself for ten, twelve, fourteen hours of hard labor in service of crossing the finish line early. He expected nothing less from his employees either. Nothing got in the way of his forward progress, except his disregard for those who worked for him. I joined his team, because I knew he was good, and I wanted to learn from the best. A few months later, I left his team, because I couldn’t tolerate being shoved around the job site by a human bull dozer.

Stories like his are common among skilled, intelligent, and ambitious people. My construction boss maintained incredible focus on the successful completion of his project, and he knew what was needed. He knew how many lengths of rebar we needed, how many yards of concrete would be used, how many labor hours and of what kind. He knew which days of the week we needed to work, in order to accommodate the inspector. He knew how long the work day needed to be. He had experience with dozens, if not hundreds of projects just like this, and he knew how to get across the finish line. The only thing missing in all of his skill, calculating, and planning was how to keep everyone motivated. How to make sure his crew learned the necessary skills for ongoing future success. How to manage his project, so that his crew would be loyal, and want to work with him on the next job.

A few years later, I found myself confronting the same challenges. I was hired to build an art studio with a crew of three, including myself. I talked at length with the property owner, and drafted plans for his final approval. I estimated how long the job would take, and wrote up a bid. He accepted my bid, and I brought on two other workers to help with the project.

I had no idea that I had already made a critical mistake by failing to include my team in the early planning and scheduling phases of the project. I completely trusted my own sense of how long it should take. My ego had to be in charge of everything, and I didn’t question whether others would know how to do the work required, or if they would work as fast or as hard as I anticipated. I failed to acknowledge my own desire to win the bid no matter what, and I laid the groundwork for my own failure.

EV, PV, AC Comparison Chart: Over Budget and Behind Schedule

As the project proceeded, I watched helplessly as it fell behind schedule, I became increasingly anxious, upset, and irritable. I began micromanaging my employees, asking how long this task took, or how many nails had been bent. What specific task where they going to do next, and how long would it take. I pushed everyone to work an extra thirty minutes here, or sixty minutes there. In a short time, they would see me approaching and they would tense up. They would roll their eyes, and take a deep pained breath. In the end, my project was a month over schedule and ten thousand dollars above budget. My client was unhappy, and I was incredibly embarrassed. This was a terrible experience, and one that I would repeat a few times before I finally learned the importance of including my project team in the early phases of project planning and scheduling.

Every answer by other PMs on the PM forum question are indeed imperative. But in my experience, none of them will lead anywhere without a dedicated, well-functioning team. This is why including the team in the early phases of planning and scheduling is so important. It allows them to visualize the project and develop a sense of ownership. They have the opportunity to inject a sense of scheduling reality into theoretical timelines that we PMs imagine are possible. Inclusion of the project team necessarily creates a more robust identification of project risks, a more accurate estimate for project duration and a more complete definition of work packages.

My experience indicates that project success is caused by good leadership, and that good leadership doesn’t require or rely on authority. Good leadership requires relationship, respect, and inclusion. Look for my soon to be released article exploring humility as a process, which can be applied by anyone to produce great results, but especially a project leader.

In the meantime, please share some of your experiences with the most critical aspects of project management. Let me know if you agree, or if you disagree with my assessment, and please do share why.


Posted on: December 08, 2014 11:57 AM | Permalink

Comments (17)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
avatar
Deanna Landers Founder and Chairman of the Board| Project Managers Without Borders Denver, Co, United States
I absolutely agree that communication is the most important factor for success in projects. The project manager must interface with the team, customers, sponsors, vendors and many others in order to bring it all together. In some cases, the communication is simple, but in most others, it's not. Having a distributed team, various cultures, various backgrounds, and/or uncooperative stakeholders makes it even more challenging.

A critical part of the role of the project manager is to frame difficult situations for the stakeholders, helping them all see a particular value or concern in a similar fashion. This alignment can go a long way toward achieving success.

avatar
Michael Adams Solutions Architect| LANL Los Alamos, Nm, United States
Thanks Deanna for your input. You bring up some excellent points, particularly with regards to a project with a distributed team. I've never had that experience, but the difficulties I've experienced with communication and buy-in would be exacerbated under those circumstances.

I really appreciate you bringing up stakeholders too. A PM, who has the team on-board, but doesn't bring stakeholders into the fold as well, may soon see morale plummet, as external obstacles are erected and the careful planning and thought from the team is rendered inapplicable.

Particularly, it would be important at that point, not to devolve into us (proj. team) vs. them (stakeholders).

I really appreciate your input!

avatar
Rebecca Braglio Community Engagement Specialist II| Project Management Institute Newtown Square, Pa, United States
How do you know when including too many people is one too many? I've found that sometimes including the entire project team can become too many cooks in the kitchen. Is there a tried and true way of narrowing it down?

avatar
Michael Adams Solutions Architect| LANL Los Alamos, Nm, United States
Rebecca, that is an excellent question, and I completely failed to address that problem at all in my post! Thanks!

I can't claim a tried and true way on this. I think I rely on knowing who will be involved, and how best to work with them, but in a setting where my team is almost completely new, that won't work so well, and then I find it important to be a skilled facilitator of discussion.

I am sure to have an agenda prepared, with a specific length printed next to each discussion topic. This allows me to smile and say, we need to move onto the next topic in order to honor the meeting time and get you all out of here on time. I can then work with anyone who has a radically different vision to find out what their specifically they are concerned with, be it a problem or opportunity.

I also employ "tricks" in meetings that I facilitate. I arrive early, and make sure the white board is blank. I sit on the opposite side of the room from the white board, and bring the eraser with me. I place the markers on the other side of the room.

If the meeting is getting way off track, I get up, and have to interrupt people as I move forward, I laugh and say "oh, excuse me, I need to get by to the white board." I'll bring one marker with me, and then start to draw a diagram or write down the bullet points of what is being said.

If the meeting spirals out of control again, I'll ask someone to pass the eraser to me.

If a topic requires more exploration, I'll say, we need to explore this more. I'll schedule a meeting for that, in the mean time, please think about it in the context of today's discussion. That will be in the meeting minutes, along with who brought the topic up, and that they will consider their point in light of the discussion.

In short, I work hard to keep the discussion focused on the topic at hand and on moving forward. I use a variety of "tricks" and poke a bit of fun at myself for forgetting to bring the eraser, etc... to interrupt a conversation that isn't moving forward.

So far this has worked well. I've conducted a SWOT analysis with local business owners and government officials aimed at community initiatives that can improve our local economic climate for small businesses. I was pretty successful at keeping that discussion on track and moving forward.

I think the main trick is to have a set agenda, definite time limits on various topics, and various tricks to interrupting a conversation without seeming rude.

Really liked the article Michael, and also the comments are so valuable. As for me as I started studying PM module, from a theoretical knowledge that I have received I was pretty much convinced that the success factor would be the procedures, estimates etc. But just by starting doing my research here on pm.com, it opened my eyes and became clear that procedures and checklist would be a secondary factor (of course they are v important). But as for every business, every job people can be the most valuable asset, and therefore the communication between people, and being able to lead them, motivate them as well as adjusting the 'perfect team' is crucial.

avatar
Michael Adams Solutions Architect| LANL Los Alamos, Nm, United States
Hi Natalia, thanks for the question. It has prompted some good discussion. I particularly appreciated hearing Deanna's and Rebecca's thoughts on this.

avatar
RAJIV GANDHI CHAKKARAVARTHY Director of Projects & Project Management| Vivid Infotech LLC Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Fantastic Mike, Its really a good article. I like your discovered points which is most important in projects.

"I finally learned the importance of including my project team in the early phases of project planning and scheduling and with good leadership"

Added to that I have few points below.

1.Yes,Its important to include a project team in early phases as well as most importantly assign the right people which is needed to the project and make sure they are working as as team. Now a days most project managers face serious trouble in the middle of the project due to unsuitable team members and it leads project failure.

2.Effective Planning will lead team focused and Keeps updated the Project progress.

3.Communication is key factor for the success and creating communication plan in the early stage of the project will avoid all confusions.

4.Change Management is very important - No matter change is small or big if we haven't plan perfectly it leads project failure.

5.UAT and Sign-Off - User Acceptance is important one, this would be done before sign-off the project. Once client accepted the work and Project Manger has Sign-off the Project before starting anything new.

avatar
Michael Adams Solutions Architect| LANL Los Alamos, Nm, United States
Rajiv, thanks for your input!

I completely see your first point, and wonder if you've had experience with getting training for team members (as part of the plan), so that they will have the appropriate skills to bat the project home successfully? I haven't had that experience, but am curious how well it works.

Your comments made me consider a risk, which could result in the need for training. If a team member leaves for any reason, how to fill that spot, particularly if they had specialized skills? I wonder how often that is overlooked during risk analysis.

I'm not sure that I could agree that a communication plan will avoid all confusion, but it will go a long way towards minimizing confusion, and the PM will better be able to address the confusion that does crop up.

Great point about change management. A change control board or something similar. Often this is the steering committee on the projects I manage. They are well poised to make decisions based on how proposed changes will impact scope, budget, schedule, increase risk, etc...

User acceptance is key, and really ought to be a metric of project success. I've noted that PMI has a new Business Analysis certification, and from my reading, the skills involved in that are key to what I consider a successful project. In my opinion, all PMs should be facile with business and process analysis, and large projects should have a business analyst dedicated to ensuring the project solves a user need. This may increase scope slightly from time to time, but having broad user acceptance is important, and an upfront engagement with users will communicate to them that this project will benefit them...stakeholder buy-in! yay!

Very Insightful

avatar
Michael Adams Solutions Architect| LANL Los Alamos, Nm, United States
HI Darren, I just saw this comment. Sorry for the late response. Thanks for dropping by and leaving a comment.

avatar
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Nice Article Michael. Tx for sharing.

avatar
Michael Adams Solutions Architect| LANL Los Alamos, Nm, United States
Rami, thanks for your comment, and for your questions on ProjectManagement.com

avatar
Markus Kopko AI Enabler for Project & Program Mgmt | Founder PMotion.ai / The PM AI Coach| PMotion.ai Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
great one, thanks for sharing

avatar
Michael Adams Solutions Architect| LANL Los Alamos, Nm, United States
Thank you Markus! I appreciate your comment and your taking time to read some of my articles!

avatar
Manouchehr Madani Civi Senior Healthcare Project Manager Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Thanks everyone for sharing.

avatar
Luis Branco CEO| Business Insight, Consultores de Gestão, Ldª Carcavelos, Lisboa, Portugal
Dear Michael
Interesting your perspective on the topic: "Project Success: What is Critical?"

Thanks for sharing

Important point to remember: "This is why including the team in the early phases of planning and scheduling is so important. It allows them to visualize the project and develop a sense of ownership. They have the opportunity to inject a sense of scheduling reality into theoretical timelines that we PMs imagine are possible. Inclusion of the project team necessarily creates a more robust identification of project risks, a more accurate estimate for project duration and a more complete definition of work packages "

avatar
Michael Adams Solutions Architect| LANL Los Alamos, Nm, United States
Thank you, Luis, I'm glad you liked it. That quote you included was a very hard-learned lesson for me (meaning it was hard for me to learn it, I had to get it wrong multiple times before learning it.

Thanks for commenting, Manouchehr.

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS

"Interestingly, according to modern astronomers, space is finite. This is a very comforting thought--particularly for people who can never remember where they have left things."

- Woody Allen

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors