What Does Professional Project Management Look Like? (Part 2)
From the Voices on Project Management Blog
by Cameron McGaughy,
Lynda Bourne, Kevin Korterud, Peter Tarhanidis, Conrado Morlan, Jen Skrabak, Mario Trentim, Christian Bisson, Yasmina Khelifi, Sree Rao, Soma Bhattacharya, Emily Luijbregts, David Wakeman, Ramiro Rodrigues, Wanda Curlee, Lenka Pincot, cyndee miller, Jorge Martin Valdes Garciatorres, Marat Oyvetsky
Voices on Project Management offers insights, tips, advice and personal stories from project managers in different regions and industries. The goal is to get you thinking, and spark a discussion. So, if you read something that you agree with--or even disagree with--leave a comment.
View Posts By:
Cameron McGaughy
Lynda Bourne
Kevin Korterud
Peter Tarhanidis
Conrado Morlan
Jen Skrabak
Mario Trentim
Christian Bisson
Yasmina Khelifi
Sree Rao
Soma Bhattacharya
Emily Luijbregts
David Wakeman
Ramiro Rodrigues
Wanda Curlee
Lenka Pincot
cyndee miller
Jorge Martin Valdes Garciatorres
Marat Oyvetsky
Past Contributors:
Rex Holmlin
Vivek Prakash
Dan Goldfischer
Linda Agyapong
Jim De Piante
Siti Hajar Abdul Hamid
Bernadine Douglas
Michael Hatfield
Deanna Landers
Kelley Hunsberger
Taralyn Frasqueri-Molina
Alfonso Bucero Torres
Marian Haus
Shobhna Raghupathy
Peter Taylor
Joanna Newman
Saira Karim
Jess Tayel
Lung-Hung Chou
Rebecca Braglio
Roberto Toledo
Geoff Mattie
Recent Posts
Project 2030: Skills We Need to Cultivate Now
The Technical Program Manager: How to Stay Relevant in 2025
5 Things Your Operational Plan Should Do
5 New Project Guardrails for Adaptive Leaders
The Leader's Voice: Respect It, Protect It, and Use It Properly!
Categories
2020,
Adult Development,
Agile,
Agile,
Agile,
agile,
Agile management,
Agile management,
Agile;Community;Talent management,
Artificial Intelligence,
Backlog,
Basics,
Benefits Realization,
Best Practices,
BIM,
business acumen,
Business Analysis,
Business Analysis,
Business Case,
Business Intelligence,
Business Transformation,
Calculating Project Value,
Canvas,
Career Development,
Career Development,
Career Help,
Career Help,
Career Help,
Career Help,
Careers,
Careers,
Careers,
Careers,
Categories: Career Help,
Change Management,
Cloud Computing,
Collaboration,
Collaboration,
Collaboration,
Collaboration,
Collaboration,
Communication,
Communication,
Communication,
Communication,
Communications Management,
Complexity,
Conflict,
Conflict Management,
Consulting,
Continuous Learning,
Continuous Learning,
Continuous Learning,
Continuous Learning,
Continuous Learning,
Cost Management,
COVID-19,
Crises,
Crisis Management,
critical success factors,
Cultural Awareness,
Culture,
Decision Making,
Design Thinking,
Digital Project Management,
Digital Transformation,
digital transformation,
Digitalisation,
Disruption,
Diversity,
Diversity,
Documentation,
Earned Value Management,
Education,
EEWH,
Enterprise Risk Management,
Escalation management,
Estimating,
Ethics,
execution,
Expectations Management,
Facilitation,
feasibility studies,
Future,
Future of Project Management,
Generational PM,
Governance,
Government,
green building,
Growth,
Horizontal Development,
Human Aspects of PM,
Human Aspects of PM,
Human Aspects of PM,
Human Aspects of PM,
Human Aspects of PM,
Human Resources,
Inclusion,
Information Technology,
Innovation,
Intelligent Building,
International,
International Development,
Internet of Things (IOT),
Internet of Things (IoT),
IOT,
Knowledge,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
Leadership,
lean construction,
LEED,
Lessons Learned,
Lessons learned;Retrospective,
Managing for Stakeholders,
managing stakeholders as clients,
Mentoring,
Mentoring,
Mentoring,
Mentoring,
Mentoring,
Methodology,
Metrics,
Micromanagement,
Microsoft Project PPM,
Motivation,
Negotiation,
Neuroscience,
neuroscience,
New Practitioners,
Nontraditional Project Management,
OKR,
Online Learning,
opportunity,
Organizational Culture,
Organizational Project Management,
Pandemic,
People management,
Planing,
planning,
PM & the Economy,
PM History,
PM Think About It,
PMBOK Guide,
PMI,
PMI EMEA 2018,
PMI EMEA Congress 2017,
PMI EMEA Congress 2019,
PMI Global Conference 2017,
PMI Global Conference 2018,
PMI Global Conference 2019,
PMI Global Congress 2010 - North America,
PMI Global Congress 2011 - EMEA,
PMI Global Congress 2011 - North America,
PMI Global Congress 2012 - EMEA,
PMI Global Congress 2012 - North America,
PMI Global Congress 2013 - EMEA,
PMI Global Congress 2013 - North America,
PMI Global Congress 2014 - EMEA,
PMI Global Congress 2014 - North America,
PMI GLobal Congress EMEA 2018,
PMI PMO Symposium 2012,
PMI PMO Symposium 2013,
PMI PMO Symposium 2015,
PMI PMO Symposium 2016,
PMI PMO Symposium 2017,
PMI PMO Symposium 2018,
PMI Pulse of the Profession,
PMO,
PMO,
pmo,
PMO Project Management Office,
portfolio,
Portfolio Management,
Portfolio Management,
portfolio management,
presentations,
Priorities,
Probability,
Problem Structuring Methods,
Process,
Procurement Management,
profess,
Program Management,
project,
Project Delivery,
Project Dependencies,
Project Failure,
project failure,
Project Leadership,
Project Management,
project management,
project management office,
Project Planning,
project planning,
Project Requirements,
Project Success,
Ransomware,
Reflections on the PM Life,
Remote,
Remote Work,
Requirements Management,
Research Conference 2010,
Researching the Value of Project Management,
Resiliency,
Risk Management,
Risk Management,
Risk management,
risk management,
ROI,
Roundtable,
Salary Survey,
Schedule Management,
Scheduling,
Scope Management,
Scrum,
search,
SelfLeadership,
SelfLeadership,
SelfLeadership,
SelfLeadership,
SelfLeadership,
Servant Leadership,
Sharing Knowledge,
Sharing Knowledge,
Sharing Knowledge,
Sharing Knowledge,
Sharing Knowledge,
Social Responsibility,
Sponsorship,
Stakeholder Management,
Stakeholder Management,
stakeholder management,
Strategy,
Strategy,
swot,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management,
Talent Management Leadership SelfLeadership Collaboration Communication,
Taskforce,
Teams,
Teams in Agile,
Teams in Agile,
teamwork,
Tech,
Technical Debt,
Technology,
TED Talks,
The Project Economy,
Timeline,
Tools,
tools,
Transformation,
transformation,
Transition,
Trust,
Value,
Vertical Development,
Volunteering,
Volunteering #Leadership #SelfLeadership,
Volunteering Sharing Knowledge Leadership SelfLeadership Collaboration Trust,
VUCA,
Women in PM,
Women in Project Management
Date
By Lynda Bourne
In the first part of this two-part series, I looked at the diverse nature of projects and project management across different organizations. In this post, I’ll explore the concept of professionalism and how it applies to the practice of project management.
The Concept of a Profession
The term “profession” has a number of distinct attributes that have changed over time.
The starting point for being a professional is the fact you are paid for your work. The next element of professional relates to skill and pride in the quality of the work being produced. The concept of a profession evolved from a need to regulate the delivery of skilled services to the community.
With the arrival of the concept of educated people undertaking a skilled role such as accounting or engineering, the idea of a professional institution made up of its members emerged.
These institutions were created by their members to act as regulatory bodies for the profession they represented. They established formal qualifications based upon education and examination, with powers to admit and discipline members.
Early modern tradition recognized four professions: divinity, medicine, law and engineering. This starting point expanded through the 19th and 20th centuries to encompass a range of other professions. The expansion continues to this day.
Characteristics of a Profession
Traditionally, a profession:
- Renders a specialized service based upon advanced and specialized knowledge and skill. The profession collectively possesses a body of knowledge and a repertoire of behaviors and skills.
- Is organized into one or more professional associations that control the actual work of the profession and the conditions that surround it (admissions, educational standards, examination and licensing, career paths, ethical and performance standards, professional discipline).
- Enjoys a common heritage of knowledge, skill and status to the cumulative store of which professional members are bound to contribute through their individual and collective efforts.
- Is bound by a distinctive ethical code in its relationships with clients, colleagues and the public.
- Is charged with a substantial degree of public obligation by virtue of its possession of specialized knowledge.
This framework was supported by governments, which used membership in professional institutions as a convenient way to regulate the provision of services to the general public.
For traditional professions this tidy arrangement between the individual, the professional institution and the government worked very effectively in many parts of the world through to the 1950s and 60s.
However, in the last 50 years or so, the traditional framework has started to break down and new concepts are emerging. Governments are increasingly moving to directly regulate the provision of professional services to the public, with the professional associations focusing on education, skills development and the encouragement of “good practice.”
There now seem to be three distinct types of professional associations:
- Those that qualify and licence members to practice the profession, sometimes with the support of government regulations.
- Those that qualify members, but where the government separately licences the member to practice.
- Those that qualify members, but there are no regulatory constraints on practice—membership is a competitive advantage.
Professional institutions such as PMI and IPMA fit into the third category. These associations are focused on developing the knowledge and capability of the profession, but anyone can practice.
This creates an interesting anomaly! Traditionally professions emerged from a group of professional practitioners creating an association to protect their specialist skills and knowledge and restrict entry to the profession.
In contrast, project management would appear to have evolved to the stage where associations are driving the development of the profession and are actively seeking members. However, the lack of regulation allows anyone to practice.
What’s a Pro Look Like?
So, back to the question posed at the start of these articles: Is project management a profession? If your benchmark is the practices of the 19th and 20th centuries, definitely not: professional associations do not control the right to practice as a project manager.
However, in the paradigm of the 21st century, we are well on the way to being a modern profession based on professional associations. And while the ability to practice project management is never likely to be regulated (we don’t threaten public safety in the way doctors and engineers can); the desire of employers to engage professional project managers (i.e., capable, qualified and ethical people) is apparent.
The challenge for the associations over the next few years will be developing the elements beyond certifications needed to support professionals, and to create ways to make this distinction attractive to members and recognizable to employers. Simple certifications are unlikely to be enough, the associations and professional members will need to demonstrate a distinct “professional” way of working.
Given the massive differences in practice between an engineering project manager running a multi-million building site and an “agile” IT project manager developing a new app, defining the core elements of professional practice will not be easy.
Some of the areas I believe will be important are:
- Stakeholder engagement and communication: projects are done by people for people. Effectively working with and influencing people is the key to success.
- Practical ethics: courageously and honestly providing the best information possible (based on reliable processes), and dealing with uncertainty (risk) and problems openly and effectively.
- Managing your project team: projects are temporary organizations with a unique set of challenges for the team leader.
- Focusing beyond narrow constraints of success (time, cost and scope): partnering with executive management and contributing to the creation of a successful project outcome. Professional project managers will be at the center of an organization’s ability to generate value from change.
These are my ideas—what do you think will shape our profession?
Posted
by
Lynda Bourne
on: June 13, 2016 09:33 PM |
Permalink
Comments (21)
Page: 1 2 next>
Please login or join to subscribe to this item
Great post. Thank you very much.
Linda, interesting summary about what a profession is and the concept of licencing. I think certificates can be pre-cursor to that, so it might develop over time for project management.
Have you had a look at the guilds? Im my view they offer even some more history (and lessons learned) about how to create a group you can rely on in doing a job using good practice and protect society. They have changed over the hundreds of years they existed and still are the base for e.g. German professional development (Handwerkskammer).
Lynda Bourne
Director, Professional Development| Mosaic Project Services Pty Ltd
South Melbourne, Vic, Australia
I did have 'Guilds' included in the original draft Thomas - edited for length....... My suggestion was that the 'Professions' were established by 'educated gentlemen' in the 19th century separate from the Guilds based on class distinctions. Guilds were merchant and trade based; the university educated upper-class gentlemen that were moving into law, medicine, theology, etc., wanted to differentiate themselves from the 'middle classes (a UK view, not sure how it translates to Europe). This leaves open the question is Project Managment a craft or a profession?
So we feel PM is something, we just fail to find agreement yet on the right category (skill, techniqnue, profession, craft, art, ...). Your question is good: what do we think is shaping PM?
My current view follows PMI and IPMA triangles for competencies:
1 Leadership - creation of a team, influencing, self-management, ethics etc
2 Perspective - understanding the project context and environment, stakeholder engagement
3 Practice - methods, tools and techniques, which depend on what we are doing
Lynda Bourne
Director, Professional Development| Mosaic Project Services Pty Ltd
South Melbourne, Vic, Australia
Your views are very similar to the framework I suggested at the end of the Poat Thomas.
Raju Rao
Founder & Principal| Xtraplus Learning & Consulting
Chennai, Tn, India
Good post summarizing current situation and possible next steps. It will be worthwhile for us to deliberate further on this .
Lynda Bourne
Director, Professional Development| Mosaic Project Services Pty Ltd
South Melbourne, Vic, Australia
Rolf Dieter Zschau
Business Analysis & Solution Lead| Volkswagen Group Charging GmbH
Unterschleissheim, Germany
Very good post. I agree with Thomas.
Sometimes PMI chapter Meetings feel like being a member of a guild :-)
But of course the difference is the actively seeking new members - but I guess that guilds did that too. And they fought fiercly against each other - sometimes the discussions about different PM certifications remind me of that ;-)
Lynda Bourne
Director, Professional Development| Mosaic Project Services Pty Ltd
South Melbourne, Vic, Australia
The question Rolf is what are we seeking new members of? A certification or a profession??
Rolf Dieter Zschau
Business Analysis & Solution Lead| Volkswagen Group Charging GmbH
Unterschleissheim, Germany
That's a good question, Lynda. Sometimes when I look at PMI, it looks more to seek new members for a certification because that brings money in. But we as members - I think we are looking more for someone joining the profession (to Sergio Luis Conte: lets follow Lynda's types of profession for this discussion), to spread the knowledge, to find people widening our knowledge and to find fellow campaingner / combatants (I'm not sure, which one's the right English word)
Agree, Rolf Dieter.
What I found important that with meeting fellow PMs I finally found somebody who understands me and my problems, questions, limitations. And they also have the same hardships and success. It is a tribe of people with the same defect.
Linda, it is not a certification I was looking for, this just came along later.
It also was not a profession, since there was no profession these days, and we may not have one today.
It was people sharing my kind of life, feeling, experiences.
Isn't it what we are looking for - case studies, war stories, lessons learned. Shared pain is easier to cope with.
Lynda Bourne
Director, Professional Development| Mosaic Project Services Pty Ltd
South Melbourne, Vic, Australia
We may be in a minority Thomas. Far more people hold a PMP credential that are members of PMI. PRINCE@ is only a certification - no 'association' at all. If professional associations are going to remain relevant we need to look at what's relevant to younger people in the 21st century. this starts with framing what a profession represents in the current era.
Rolf Dieter Zschau
Business Analysis & Solution Lead| Volkswagen Group Charging GmbH
Unterschleissheim, Germany
@ Thomas: I wouldn't call it "defect" - but I agree. The "tribe" analogy is a good one.
I came to PMI at last because I was urged by my company to get certified (to have a paper they can show to clients). But what keeps me with PMI are the people with their stories, lessons learned and diverse experiences.
@Rolf Dieter, well said, it is more defining for a tribe why you stay than why you joined in the first place.
@Lynda, that said, I would not relate mere certificate holders as core members of the profession. I believe there needs to be an emotional attachment, call in love or passion or enlightenment. Only then you volunteer, accept ethics and values, try to improve the profession and thereby make it more relevant. I haven't seen this mentioned as an attribute of a profession yet.
Lynda Bourne
Director, Professional Development| Mosaic Project Services Pty Ltd
South Melbourne, Vic, Australia
Raju Rao
Founder & Principal| Xtraplus Learning & Consulting
Chennai, Tn, India
Lynda's question what do members want ? Certification or Profession is a good starting point to go forward. As Rolf has observed ,for some certification is the goal . In fact I daresay that PMI also supports this because of its successful flagship program - PMP. Others are seeking professional excellence for which certification becomes a byproduct. There is wide divergence between these groups in their needs and aspirations .
Notwithstanding these differences,there is a need to have reasonable assurance that large value projects that are funded publicly and mission critical projects are manned and executed by competent professionals . This is where I don't see any choice but to benchmark with other older professions . Even if PM is not a profession now , in the long run we have to go through this route ... we will at least reach somewhere midway.
Lynda Bourne
Director, Professional Development| Mosaic Project Services Pty Ltd
South Melbourne, Vic, Australia
A more fundamental question is focused on objectives - is membership a measure of professionalism? Originally professions were set up as exclusive institutions - designed to exclude people who did not meet their high standards.
Membership in what? We have competing organizations for PM. Is a medical doctor mandatory member of any organization? Even if he is not accredited, his doctor thesis and oath makes him a member of the profession, if he was not expelled for some reason. So no, membership is no defining criterium for a profession. And even certification today is not, as there are multiple, unaligned.
I think it is rather a philosophical question, PM Journal just now has some papers on PM philosophy, and this might get us somehow further.
Regarding exclusions, maybe we should come to the point to exclude and expel the PM scharlatans. A profession should be able to protect itself and society against people who just want to benefit from it but not willing to sacrifice.
Page:
1 2 next>
Please Login/Register to leave a comment.
|
I've never heard of a relationship being affected by punctuation.
- Jerry Seinfeld
|