Are You Spinning Your Wheels?
From the Strategic Project Management Blog
by Ty Kiisel
"The only purpose of starting is to finish, and while the projects we do are never really finished, they must ship," writes Seth Godin in his book Linchpin: Are You Indispensable?
"Shipping something out the door, doing it regularly, without hassle, emergency, or fear—this is a rare skill," writes Godin, "something that makes you indispensable."
Of course Godin is talking about projects in the broader context of what we do, but it still applies. It's easy for some organizations to get all wrapped up in the process of work or projects and forget that there needs to be some kind of deliverable at the end—something of value. And, sometimes it's not just an organizational problem either. I have known several very talented and capable people who work very hard but never seem get anything done (they always seem to be spinning their wheels).
What is it about actually finishing something that is so difficult for individuals and organizations? If you can answer that question in your own organization, you'll be indispensable. Godin identifies two challenges that make finishing (shipping) successfully so difficult:
-
Thrashing
-
Coordination
Thrashing, according to Godin, "...is the apparently productive brainstorming and tweaking we do for a project as it develops. Thrashing might mean changing the user interface or rewriting an introductory paragraph. Sometimes thrashing is merely a tweak; other times it involves major surgery."
I think we can all agree that no mater how well a project is planned, there is a certain amount of "thrashing" that takes place—I have yet to meet a project that is planned perfectly from start to finish. The problem with "thrashing" isn't that it happens, but is all about when it happens. The earlier the brainstorming takes place, the better it is for the project. The later in the process, the greater the opportunity to introduce problems, bugs and glitches.
Coming from the software industry, Godin asserts that "Every software project that has missed its target date (every single one) is a victim of late thrashing." I think it's safe to say this could very well be true of any project that struggles, whether or not it is a software-related project.
I also think it's pretty safe to say that the more people involved in the decision-making process, the more difficult it becomes to actually make a decision. Not just a little bit more difficult, but exponentially more difficult. "The reason that start-ups almost always defeat large companies in the rush to market is simple: start-ups have fewer people to coordinate, less thrashing, and more linchpins per square foot. They can't afford anything else and they have less to lose."
Projects run by a committee are seldom successful. Coordinating everyone's opinions and agendas can be a real project killer. Someone needs to have the ultimate authority to make project decisions. "That means you need formal procedures for excluding people, even well-meaning people with authority," says Godin.
Sometimes the decision to exclude people boils down to whether or not the project ships on time or gets bogged down in a morass of lengthy approval requirements. In my opinion, this is the death knell for any project.
I wasn't expecting to find so much great information in Godin's book, but I did. I finished the book this morning and it will take a prominent place on my bookshelf. I can highly recommend it to anyone who is trying to get work done, lead a team or an organization or simply wants to advance their career.
Shipping makes you indispensable. What are you doing to spin your wheels less and deliver more?
Posted on: March 21, 2011 12:29 PM |
Permalink
Comments (2)
Please login or join to subscribe to this item
cristian rosu
Global Business Manager| MAHLE GmbH
Regensburg, Germany
Hi.
I wish my company leadership team access these blogs. In a huge company like mine there are hundred of thousands spinning wheels.
I was talking to one of my peers the other day and he was complaining for having so much work to do. I asked him back how many of his tasks are linked to projects with clear objectives and business case. And how many of these tasks or projects are value adding in line with the company/division business plan. Working in the coping zone is morale and engagement destroying. It does not allow room for creative work and it multiplies the number of mistakes. In the same time, being so busy you loose the sight of the big picture.
The picture you selected for this blog is very representative. When stuck in the sand (lack of productivity) is no point accelerating as it spends more energy for nothing. You need to get off the car and find a different solution. Many projects are going ahead just because nobody has the guts to pull the plug. These projects are using resources in the detriment of projects that are real stars and could progress faster into cash cows.
Coming to decision process issue, I am on the opinion that everyone should have an input into the decision system and the final decision should be made only by the PM. Project management is not about democracy, is about making decisions on time based on data ready available. Lack of decision is worse than any decision.
With regard to people, clear breaks between tasks/projects generate self motivation. If the big topics are broken into small pieces and the end of each of them is well accounted for, the frustration and overwhelming transforms into engagement and desire for more.
For thrashing I have the following logic. Changing the boundary conditions for a problem will generate a totally different solution. A different solution means a new project. Hence, the old one has to be closed and a new project generated with new objectives, business case, and time plan. In an agile PM organisation, the risk assessment should start with thinking on what are the possible changes throughout the project life and accommodate them into the project plan from the beginning.
Ty Kiisel
Manager Social Outreach| AtTask
Lehi, Ut, United States
Cristian,
I've never heard it described as "working in the coping zone," but it's a great description of what most people have to work with every day. And, you are right. It is a real morale killer. Most people want to be a part of something that is bigger than themselves. They want (and need) to feel like what they do every day is of value.
The good news is that most of the time, the leader who has the most impact on any given situation is not from the C-Suite, it's someone in the trenches close to the work. As project leaders, we are in a great position to positively impact the teams we work with—regardless of what those in upper management do on a daily basis. We can empower the teams we work with to make decisions and create. It's up to us to do it. Ultimately, as you suggest, someone needs to be responsible for the final decision (you can't make decisions by committee), but giving team members the ability to make decisions and execute on them empowers them with ownership and prepares them for greater contribution to the organization in the future.
Thanks for reading and contributing to the conversation.
Please Login/Register to leave a comment.
|
"Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made president should on no account be allowed to do the job."
- Douglas Adams
|