Project Management

Project Managers can Prevent the Three Signs of a Miserable Job

From the Easy in theory, difficult in practice Blog
by
My musings on project management, project portfolio management and change management. I'm a firm believer that a pragmatic approach to organizational change that addresses process & technology, but primarily, people will maximize chances for success. This blog contains articles which I've previously written and published as well as new content.

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

Leading Through Crisis Means Leading Through Context

"It's the end. But the moment has been prepared for." - retirement lessons from the Doctor

Just because they are non-critical, doesn't mean they are not risky!

Just because they are non-critical, doesn't mean they are not risky!

How will YOU avoid these AI-related cognitive biases?

Categories

Agile, Artificial Intelligence, Career Development, Change Management, Communications Management, Decision Making, Governance, Hiring, Kanban, Lessons Learned, Personal Development, PMO, Portfolio Management, Project Management, Resource Management, Risk Management, Risk Management, Schedule Management, Scheduling, Tools

Date

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  

Categories: Project Management


Patrick Lencioni’s book The Three Signs of a Miserable Job is an easy-to-read parable covering key sources of employee disengagement and what can be done to eliminate them.

The book takes the functional manager’s view – Lencioni states on his web-site “The primary source of job misery and the potential cure for that misery resides in the hands of one individual - the direct manager”. For staff working in a matrix organization, a significant proportion of their effort is spent on projects, hence Lencioni’s recommendations should be adapted for use by project managers as well.

The three signs that Lencioni identifies are irrelevance, inability to self-measure performance or success (or as Lencioni’s puts it, “immeasurement”) and anonymity. Let’s review some ways in which project managers can reduce these sources of misery.

Unless we are sociopaths, we want to know that the work we are doing is making a difference to someone, somewhere – without that we feel irrelevant. Projects are a medium for generating value through change, and if that change is expected to positively impact some stakeholder community, then that is something to feel good about.

Project managers should always ensure that their team understand the benefits of the work they are doing. This should start as early as the project kick-off meeting but that should not be where it ends. If the project manager can solicit periodic visits by representatives from stakeholder groups to talk to the team it can help to revitalize stress-dampened spirits.

Regular recognition of a team member’s efforts is important, but a generic “keep up the good work” is no substitute for one’s ability to quantify the progress they are making for themselves. As Lencioni explains, this is one of the benefits that salespeople enjoy – they have a very quantitative method of assessing if they are succeeding! For those of us whose days are spent in a never-ending stream of meetings without producing or selling anything tangible, self-assessment can be a little more challenging.

Projects provide an excellent opportunity to avoid this source of misery. By defining and completing a backlog of work items, team members are able to quantify their own progress. While this is not the primary rationale for scope decomposition, project managers could use this as part of their “sales pitch” to convince team members that this is a necessary practice. This is also the rationale behind the agile practice of using sprints or iterations – it is a lot easier to assess progress against work items that can be completed within one sprint than it is against activities that span multiple weeks or months.

Employees want to be recognized as individuals.

The ubiquitous use of the term “resource” should be banned – it furthers perceptions that team members are a fungible commodity. We may only work with assigned staff for a brief span of time, but it is in our projects’ best interests for us to get to know them as more than just a set of initials on a Gantt chart activity line.

It is a good practice for project managers to meet with team members as they are assigned to a project to review their work assignments and to set expectations for expected performance. This also provides a great opportunity to learn something unique about the team member and to share something unique about yourself with them.

Other opportunities for avoiding anonymity could be to start your team meetings by having someone talk about something interesting they did over the previous weekend. You could facilitate a team building exercise to identify team members based on a unique attribute, behavior or experience.

If you can demonstrate to your team members that you recognize and respect them as unique individuals, help them understand how the work they are performing matters and help them measure their own performance, you may realize John Quincy Adams’ quote “If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.”

(Note: this article was originally written and published by me in December 2012 on Projecttimes.com)


Posted on: February 01, 2018 06:34 AM | Permalink

Comments (8)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
avatar
Drake Settsu Project Manager / Blogger Hi, United States
Very good article Kiron.

Those three signs can really affect the morale of a team member.

The Project Manager needs to act like a coach at times by praising good work done and reminding the team member that we are counting on you to complete a task by a certain date.

avatar
Kiron Bondale Retired | Mentor| Retired Welland, Ontario, Canada
Thanks Drake!

avatar
Anish Abraham Privacy Program Manager| University of Washington Auburn, Wa, United States
Good article and thanks for the insight, Kiron.
I think when we value employees and their work, the satisfaction and productivity rises, and they are motivated to maintain or improve their good work.

avatar
Kiron Bondale Retired | Mentor| Retired Welland, Ontario, Canada
Thanks Anish - I've found that Lencioni's three signs also aligns well with the top three levels of Maslow's hierarchy of needs. If we keep our eyes on all of those, we increase the odds of having a motivated team.

avatar
Stéphane Parent Self Employed / Semi-retired| Leader Maker Prince Edward Island, Canada
I have read Lencioni's Five Dysfunctions of a Team fable. I may have to pick this one up, as well.

avatar
Eric Isom Owner| learn.pmguaranteed.com Ut, United States
Thanks for the article, Kiron. You’ve reminded me to revisit the benefits of my current project with the sponsor, key stakeholders, and the development team. Not only will it be good for morale, it will help us come up with creative, valuable solutions.

avatar
Eduin Fernando Valdes Alvarado Project Manager| F y F Fabricamos Futuro Villavicencio, Meta, Colombia
Very interesting article, thanks

avatar
Karan Shah Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Excellent article, Kiron.

I personally replace weekly team review calls hosting the entire team with 1:1 weekly calls with directly-reporting individual team members and project counterparts. This helps reinforce the project objectives and also provides an opportunity to make sure such team members have everything they need and any hurdles they face professionally or personally.

I encourage them to have similar calls with their direct reports - but I haven't had much success in setting up that habit. This article does tell me to either reinforce this request strongly or to take up this communication myself - since most dissatisfaction issues do seem to arise from the lower ranks of the project hierarchy.

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS

Don't be humble. You're not that great.

- Golda Meir

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors