Project Management

Beware milestone convergence!

From the Easy in theory, difficult in practice Blog
by
My musings on project management, project portfolio management and change management. I'm a firm believer that a pragmatic approach to organizational change that addresses process & technology, but primarily, people will maximize chances for success. This blog contains articles which I've previously written and published as well as new content.

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

What won't change...

Five questions to answer before seeking a project management mentor

Does precarity impede agility?

Am I about to join a psychologically unsafe team?

Applying the heuristics of "How Big Things Get Done" to adaptive delivery

Categories

Agile, Artificial Intelligence, Change Management, Decision Making, Governance, Hiring, Kanban, Personal Development, PMO, Portfolios (PPM), Project Management, Risk Management, Team Building, Tools

Date



One of the symptoms of lower organizational project management maturity is having more projects active than can predictably be delivered by teams.  Even if processes have been implemented for work intake or prioritization, if governance committees continue to accept all project requests presented to them (i.e. the project funnel is a tunnel) the likelihood of staff overworking but still under delivering is high.

In most cases, this may not be the worst thing that could happen – so long as project and functional managers are able to keep their team members focusing on completing the most critical milestones, delays on less important projects might be an acceptable inefficiency.

Where this does become more concerning is when there are multiple genuinely important projects underway and this gets coupled with a work allocation model that has most staff performing operational and project duties.  In such cases, there is a strong probability that at one or more times of the year, there will be a convergence of “can’t miss” milestones across multiple projects conflicting with the completion of one or more critical operational initiatives.

In an organization with lower levels of maturity, this situation can be similar to the chaos that would ensue if a half-dozen footballs were dropped in the midst of an unsupervised group of preschoolers.  In the organizational context, staff will focus on the project milestone or operational activity which has been given the greatest priority by their project manager (in strong or some balanced matrix organizations) or by their direct reporting manager (in functional, weak or some balanced matrix organizations).  Since not each team member will receive the same instructions or priority directions, the risk is high that nearly all milestones will be missed.

To avoid such entropy, the easy answer is for the organization to take on less work – they should cut their coat according to their cloth.  However, this requires a fairly detailed quantitative understanding of staff capacity and capability as well as a governance team that is judicious about project selection & scheduling – both signs of a higher maturity organization.

Failing this, what else can be done?  Try to avoid milestone convergence at all costs.

While the ultimate tool to help achieve this might be a detailed cross-project/operations schedule, this will take a tremendous amount of effort to develop and, in low maturity organizations, it will be out-of-date the moment it has been published.

A simpler approach is for project & functional managers to maintain a list of critical milestones for their project and operational responsibilities for the next few quarters.  The only information required to be captured is the name of the initiative, the milestone description, the true degree of schedule flexibility for the milestone (or rather, the impact if the forecast date slips) and the forecast date. 

When developing project schedules or creating operational calendars, project and functional managers should review this list and if they are in a situation where a new milestone will conflict with existing ones, a quick meeting should be called to identify the “pecking order” at the milestone (NOT project or initiative) level, and rescheduling should take place on all other initiatives.  If this can’t be done for a particular convergence point, at least the organization will have a sufficiently advanced “head’s up” to assign additional staff or other such techniques of avoiding contention.

Reducing the number of active project and operational responsibilities for staff is a long term goal for lower maturity organizations, but a good short term objective is to shift focus to key milestones across concurrent work streams to avoid perfect storms.

(Note: this article was originally written and published by me in June 2013 on my personal blog, kbondale.wordpress.com)

Posted on: February 12, 2018 09:05 AM | Permalink

Comments (8)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
avatar
Anish Abraham Privacy Program Manager| University of Washington Auburn, Wa, USA
Good article Kiron, and thanks for sharing.
I agree that the short term objective would be to shift focus to key milestones but at the same time organization should take consistent, small steps towards improving maturity.

avatar
Kiron Bondale
Community Champion
Mentor| World Class Productivity Inc. Welland, Ontario, Canada
Thanks Anish!

avatar
Kevin Drake Business Manager Electrical Engineering Services | SGS Australia Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Excellent article Kiron, you have opened up my eyes.

avatar
Drake Settsu Project Manager / Blogger Hi, USA
Good article Kron.

I agree that maturity plays an important part in delverying successful projects. Having many projects competing for the same resources is risky business. Some times you getaway with it. Play it safe an plan things out better.

avatar
Riyadh Salih Saskatchewan, Canada
Kiron, very nice Convergence & Divergence was one of my favorite analysis tool and also I look at cultural convergence and divergence among group members.

avatar
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
You make some good points Kiron - In my line of business, Ive seen this in many small to medium companies who does consulting or engineering.

avatar
Sante Delle-Vergini Senior Project Manager| Infosys Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Thanks Kiron for highlighting the dreaded colliding milestones.

You mean functional managers will talk to eachother? ;-) The simple answer might be to have less milestones because some PM's do create a lot of them. Another is to have milestones part of compliance where they need to satisfy a list of criteria before becoming a milestone, and look for other nearby milestones from other projects before committing. Which is why it should be looked at from the program or portfolio level.

avatar
Kiron Bondale
Community Champion
Mentor| World Class Productivity Inc. Welland, Ontario, Canada
Thanks Kevin, Drake, Riyadh, Rami & Sante! Milestone convergence is like the death by a thousand cuts!

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS

"The purpose of art: to make the unconscious conscious."

- Richard Wagner

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors