Don’t forget the two T’s of successful change management
From the Easy in theory, difficult in practice Blog
by Kiron Bondale
My musings on project management, project portfolio management and change management.
I'm a firm believer that a pragmatic approach to organizational change that addresses process & technology, but primarily, people will maximize chances for success.
This blog contains articles which I've previously written and published as well as new content.
Recent Posts
Leading Through Crisis Means Leading Through Context
"It's the end. But the moment has been prepared for." - retirement lessons from the Doctor
Just because they are non-critical, doesn't mean they are not risky!
Just because they are non-critical, doesn't mean they are not risky!
How will YOU avoid these AI-related cognitive biases?
Categories
Agile,
Artificial Intelligence,
Career Development,
Change Management,
Communications Management,
Decision Making,
Governance,
Hiring,
Kanban,
Lessons Learned,
Personal Development,
PMO,
Portfolio Management,
Project Management,
Resource Management,
Risk Management,
Risk Management,
Schedule Management,
Scheduling,
Tools
Date
When we think about what facilitates successful organizational change, we tend to think of visible sponsorship, active engagement of those involved in the change, and incrementalism.
However, I was reminded of two other important pieces to the change jigsaw puzzle after reading the book Agile Change Management: Trust and talent.
You might take exception to the first one and say that trust is necessary for any business interaction or transaction to succeed. While that is true, there is a greater need for trust when people are being asked to leave their comfort zones and adopt new processes or tools. When there is a high level of trust that the leadership team is looking out for them and acting in the best interests of both the organization and its people resources, there is a stronger likelihood that staff will take a leap of faith.
When staff distrust the intentions or actions of their leaders, they may say that are going to embrace a change and might even begin to adopt it. Unfortunately, their commitment to staying the course is likely to be brief, especially if they hit the inevitable challenges which come with trying something new. When this happens, they will regress to previous practices defending their behavior by saying that they did give the changes a fair try.
We’ve seen this happen frequently in the world of politics – citizens will blissfully vote against their self interests simply because they don’t trust the person who is pushing a platform which is beneficial to them.
Melanie Franklin, the author of the book, references talent in relation to those implementing the change – this is obviously important since the change will not be implemented as effectively or efficiently by those lacking necessary skills and further, the perception of the change will be sullied in the eyes of those impacted by the change. Her logical assertion is that when we work on things which we are good at, we tend to derive more satisfaction and are more engaged in the work.
I’ll go one further and say that talent is an equally important consideration in those who are expected to adopt the change. Nearly all change implementations including a communications and training component to help adopters learn new practices. However, many times the change team does not consider whether the necessary prerequisite behaviors and skills are in place to ensure that the training they are providing will achieve the desired objectives.
My favorite analogy is that of teaching a caveman how to use a rocket-propelled grenade launcher. You might educate him on the importance of a firm stance to absorb recoil, but without foundational understanding, he is as likely to fall to the ground and worship the weapon as he is to use it properly!
So the next time you are managing a change initiative, add these questions to your impact assessment checklist:
- Do those about to be impacted by the change trust those who are implementing and championing it?
- Do those who will be impacted by the change have the necessary foundational skills to successfully adopt it?
(Note: this article was originally written and published by me in May 2014 on my personal blog, kbondale.wordpress.com)
Posted on: February 13, 2018 08:31 AM |
Permalink
Comments (10)
Please login or join to subscribe to this item
Good article Kiron.
Those two questions on the checklist are spot on.
Aaron Porter
Community Champion
IT Director| Blade HQ
Payson, UT, United States
Is the book worth purchasing?
From what I can tell, looking ant excerpts on Amazon and Google, it is about Organizational change, not Project change. What concerns me is something I read on pages 11-12:
"Application of these principles is challenging because an agile approach does not present those funding or governing the change with a detailed understanding of what they are getting; they have to have faith that those involved will deliver on an 'as needed' basis..."
Organizational change is about helping people change. Does the book address how to get leadership over a change to 'have faith'? If you can't help leadership change, you won't help anybody else.
If the book addresses the people side of change, and is more than a book on how to apply agile principles to change initiatives, I'm interested.
Anish Abraham
Privacy Program Manager| University of Washington
Auburn, Wa, United States
People always wanted to stay in their comfort zone and I believe it's a silent killer of change efforts.
Those are good questions for the assessment checklist, Kiron and thanks for sharing this.
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates
New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
As usual, Good post snd points Kiron.
Thanks Anish & Rami!
Aaron, there are two chapters specifically focusing on the softer side of change - namely building positive relationships and the importance of the supporting environment.
I read the book back in 2014 and found it helpful at that time given some of the large-scale changes I was involved with or led.
Kiron
This is good Kiron. It highlights the difference between the change implementation and ongoing "maintenance" or success of that change moving forward.
Thanks Sante - you are correct (as usual :-) ) - mission accomplished means that a change is sustainable not just that we've implemented something!
Kiron
As usual, excellent blog from Kiron
Please Login/Register to leave a comment.
|
"Nothing defines humans better than their willingness to do irrational things in the pursuit of phenomenally unlikely payoffs."
- Scott Adams
|