The Power of Effective Communication
From the Easy in theory, difficult in practice Blog
by Kiron Bondale
My musings on project management, project portfolio management and change management.
I'm a firm believer that a pragmatic approach to organizational change that addresses process & technology, but primarily, people will maximize chances for success.
This blog contains articles which I've previously written and published as well as new content.
Recent Posts
Leading Through Crisis Means Leading Through Context
"It's the end. But the moment has been prepared for." - retirement lessons from the Doctor
Just because they are non-critical, doesn't mean they are not risky!
Just because they are non-critical, doesn't mean they are not risky!
How will YOU avoid these AI-related cognitive biases?
Categories
Agile,
Artificial Intelligence,
Career Development,
Change Management,
Communications Management,
Decision Making,
Governance,
Hiring,
Kanban,
Lessons Learned,
Personal Development,
PMO,
Portfolio Management,
Project Management,
Resource Management,
Risk Management,
Risk Management,
Schedule Management,
Scheduling,
Tools
Date
There is a strong likelihood that if you have taken a project management training course within the last decade you have heard some variant on the statistic that 90% of a project manager's time is spent communicating. As with everything else, too much of a good thing can cause problems.
I have worked with junior project managers as well as some seasoned ones who focus on over communication instead of effective communication. Their concern is that the perceived importance of information is in the eye of the stakeholder. They are concerned that, if the project manager does not provide full disclosure to stakeholders, sponsors or team members, the project manager's information filtering could spawn or worsen a project issue.
This is a valid risk as a lack of open communication of assumptions, issues or risks has likely caused more project failures than scope creep or limited resource availability.
However, to swing the pendulum from limited communication to the other extreme raises some risks. For a sponsor or stakeholder to find some data that is of value to them, they have to wade through reams of interesting but low value (to them) information. Additionally, drowning stakeholders in minutiae is a good way to lose their interest or attention in your project, to say nothing about reducing credibility in the project manager's capabilities.
While useful for sharing project information or eliciting feedback, online communication methods such as Twitter, instant messaging, and worst of all, e-mail can dramatically aggravate this situation. While this information overload issue is dangerous for traditional projects, it is lethal for virtual projects as it increases the probability of stakeholder isolation or withdrawal.
So how does one determine the sweet spot for project communications?
- Include a thorough stakeholder analysis as part of your project communications planning. For key stakeholders as well as your sponsor, make sure you understand what, when & how do they wish to be get apprised about.
- Leverage both push & pull methods of communicating - push information that is time sensitive or requires action. Let other information be pulled by stakeholders (unless they have specifically asked you to push it to them).
- Refresh your communications plan based on feedback. Meet with stakeholders on a periodic basis to gauge if they feel that your level of communication is effective.
- Be consistent in communication content & structure. This helps to reduce effort spent by team members or stakeholders in processing information and demonstrates predictability and professionalism.
I wrote in a previous article that a governing principle of project management is Always Be Communicating - perhaps this should be re-framed as Always be EFFECTIVELY Communicating.
(Note: this article was originally written and published by me in June 2010 on Projecttimes.com)
Posted on: March 01, 2018 06:59 AM |
Permalink
Comments (17)
Please login or join to subscribe to this item
Good article Kiron.
A set frequency and consistency of the type of information being reported really helps. Filtering out any unnecessary information will provide better clarity so everyone is on the same page.
Thanks Eduin!
Drake - minimally sufficient to meet stakeholder needs should be every communicator's mantra!
Kiron
What information, How to deliver, Whom to deliver and frequency is the key to effective communication.
Details if required may be pulled, is a great way to reduce clutter that may mask the important information or a lost interest by stakeholder.
Thank you Kiron for an informative article.
Good one Kiron. It's so true that there is a decreasing benefit to communication at each end of the spectrum. Like chocolate, too much of a good thing may not be a good thing.
Thanks Sante, but you are communicating with a lifelong chocaholic who would beg to differ!
Kiron
Oh then we are in the same boat Kiron. Although I have turned to dark chocolate in recent years. They say some of that every day IS a good thing :-)
Anish Abraham
Privacy Program Manager| University of Washington
Auburn, Wa, United States
Good points, Kiron and thanks for sharing.
I guess PMs should be willing to get their hands dirty and ask questions. Listening is one thing, but to get to the bottom of processes and situations they need to get their hands dirty.
Excellent analysis, as usual, Kiron.
Asynchronous ("pull") communication is one of the most underutilised methods of communication. Our current generation is still too reliant on email messages. Of course, it requires an underlying collaboration architecture to suitably implement - but it is always worth it on every engagement.
The other challenge is the expectation of stakeholders to receive information on push communication -- this is something that has to be addressed under stakeholder engagement.
Lastly, another critical point is where you bring up being consistent in the communication structure. At the times when I have jumped into a project midway during execution - the absence of such a structure, itself, is exasperating.
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates
New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Good Points Kiron.
I would like to add something to you last piece: Always be Efficiently & Effectively Communicating.
Communicating Efficiently is one side of the equation that deals with providing ONLY the information needed. The other part if the equation is Communicating Effectively which deals with providing the information in the right format at the right time.
Both combined will result in successful communication.
Drew Craig
Sr. Agile & Product Coach| Vanguard
Philadelphia, Pa, United States
Good list Kiron, and great additions by other members. We speak so much of value; the same rings true for project management practices, including communication.
@Sante, definitely dark chocolate :)
@Rami, great point on efficient comms
Thanks Anish & Andrew and great additional recommendations, Karan & Rami!
Kiron
Elizeu Antonio
Manager for Network Operations| MSTelcom
Luanda, Angola
Good knowledge on effective communication, Kiron. Thank you for sharing.
Thanks Kiron. However would like to add that in mix / strong matrix we have to be very carefully while making communication plan.
Please Login/Register to leave a comment.
|
"Live as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever."
- Mahatma Gandhi
|