Project Management

Overcoming Newton’s First Law with Organizational Project Management maturity

From the Easy in theory, difficult in practice Blog
by
My musings on project management, project portfolio management and change management. I'm a firm believer that a pragmatic approach to organizational change that addresses process & technology, but primarily, people will maximize chances for success. This blog contains articles which I've previously written and published as well as new content.

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

Leading Through Crisis Means Leading Through Context

"It's the end. But the moment has been prepared for." - retirement lessons from the Doctor

Just because they are non-critical, doesn't mean they are not risky!

Just because they are non-critical, doesn't mean they are not risky!

How will YOU avoid these AI-related cognitive biases?

Categories

Agile, Artificial Intelligence, Career Development, Change Management, Communications Management, Decision Making, Governance, Hiring, Kanban, Lessons Learned, Personal Development, PMO, Portfolio Management, Project Management, Resource Management, Risk Management, Risk Management, Schedule Management, Scheduling, Tools

Date

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  


A client of mine raised a concern that reminded me that Newton’s First Law applies to more than just physics – in the absence of net force, PM practices do not change.  The corollary is that inconsistency in PM practices tends to increase rather than decrease over time.

What sometimes contributes to this is the Broken Window (a.k.a. Monkey-see, Monkey-do) syndrome combined with the well intentioned desire to avoid imposing bureaucracy or micro-management on staff.

A challenge for many organizations is that they don’t have metrics in place to be able to justify improvements to PM practices by demonstrating quantitative improvements to profitability or other operational performance indicators.  This results in change reluctance as potential intangible benefits are offset by very tangible perceived risks.

However, one has to remember that the converse is also true – an outcome of successful change is a greater appetite for more change.  Organizations with a successful project management capability improvement program are able to foster a culture that abhors lethargy.

So how do you get your change pendulum swinging?

If you try to get the millstone of PM inertia to move through brute force, even with strong executive sponsorship and support you will fail.  On the other hand, if you adopt a strategy based on introducing incremental changes in a manner that offsets net new effort or costs on staff with “some” perceived benefits, and if you are able to reward early converts to the “new way” such that they become advocates, your PM change initiative can become self-sustainable.

(Note: this article was originally written and published by me in April 2010 on my personal blog, kbondale.wordpress.com)

 


Posted on: March 14, 2018 06:59 AM | Permalink

Comments (5)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
avatar
Najam Mumtaz Retired Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
"Incremental change is better than ambitious failure. . . .Success feeds on itself."
Tal Ben-Shahar

Thank you Kiron for a wonderful article.

avatar
Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD Senior Project Manager| Infosys Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Just as well our projects don't operate in a vacuum Kiron, or else it might be hard to reverse things.

avatar
Kiron Bondale Retired | Mentor| Retired Welland, Ontario, Canada
Thanks Najam & Sante!

Kiron

avatar
Eduin Fernando Valdes Alvarado Project Manager| F y F Fabricamos Futuro Villavicencio, Meta, Colombia
Thanks for sharing

avatar
Kiron Bondale Retired | Mentor| Retired Welland, Ontario, Canada
Thanks Eduin!

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS

Maybe the dingo ate your baby.

- Elaine Benes

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors