Project management education should be like riding a tricycle
From the Easy in theory, difficult in practice Blog
by Kiron Bondale
My musings on project management, project portfolio management and change management.
I'm a firm believer that a pragmatic approach to organizational change that addresses process & technology, but primarily, people will maximize chances for success.
This blog contains articles which I've previously written and published as well as new content.
Recent Posts
Leading Through Crisis Means Leading Through Context
"It's the end. But the moment has been prepared for." - retirement lessons from the Doctor
Just because they are non-critical, doesn't mean they are not risky!
Just because they are non-critical, doesn't mean they are not risky!
How will YOU avoid these AI-related cognitive biases?
Categories
Agile,
Artificial Intelligence,
Career Development,
Change Management,
Communications Management,
Decision Making,
Governance,
Hiring,
Kanban,
Lessons Learned,
Personal Development,
PMO,
Portfolio Management,
Project Management,
Resource Management,
Risk Management,
Risk Management,
Schedule Management,
Scheduling,
Tools
Date
A few years back, PMI implemented a number of changes to their Continuing Certification Requirements program which requires certified professionals to earn Professional Development Units (PDUs) over a three year period to retain their certification. One of the key changes was that formal education-based PDUs must be earned from courses spanning the following three areas: technical project management, leadership, and business & strategic.
When we categorize the multiple competencies which are required to be a successful project manager, you’ll find the need to have a solid foundation of project management theory and practice, coupled with significant soft skills and sufficient domain expertise.
Some of you might argue that only the first two are a must, but the reality is that most managers will prefer to hire a project manager who understands their business processes and industry nuances enough that they can help identify risks and challenge assumptions and estimates.
These three categories map exactly to PMI’s requirements for the Talent Triangle. So while my initial reaction was to ask “Why fix what isn’t broke?”, upon further reflection, I believe this change is positive.
Many of the project managers I’ve met had focused their formal education on technical project management (e.g. risk management, critical chain) earlier in their career but as their experience increased, the focus shifted to enhancing soft skills or in gaining further domain expertise.
While any effort spent on developing oneself is good, there are risks in focusing development efforts on a single area.
If we focus on technical project management, we could learn about tools and techniques which we can’t apply within our work environment, and the investment is wasted. We could also run the risk of becoming dogmatic as there are very few technical project management courses that are 100% pragmatic.
If the focus is on soft skills development alone, we will certainly improve our ability to forge positive relationships with stakeholders and with our team members, but might lose track of how the tools and techniques within our profession are evolving and could come across as Luddites.
Finally, if the emphasis is placed on domain expertise, we would gain the respect and credibility of our customer and key business partners, but we run the risk of overstepping our boundaries with the analysts and other subject matter experts on our teams, and we might lose sight of the key tools and techniques required to be a successful project manager.
Recognizing that individual professionals are not likely to have the same level of interest across all three categories, PMI has only established minimum requirements for each. If someone is particularly interested in developing their soft skills, once they have earned the minimum PDUs for all three categories, they can earn the balance of their formal education-based PDUs through additional soft skills courses.
While a unicycle can be a capable means of transportation, a tricycle is more versatile.
(Note: I took the training wheels of this article in March 2015 on my personal blog, kbondale.wordpress.com)
Posted on: August 21, 2018 06:59 AM |
Permalink
Comments (15)
Please login or join to subscribe to this item
Sam Motes
Manager II Business Sys, Operational Excellence| BA Systems Inc.
Ellenton, Fl, United States
Great insight as always Kiron. My first mentor in Project Management used to say the Project Manager needed to have knowledge based that was a mile wide and and inch deep. Meaning you need to know enough about the business to drive execution. I agree with the 3 phase focus though to drive some clarity around how to build a balanced skill set. Certainly don't short shift the last left of business and strategy. Without that you can't build the trust of being a true partner with the business who has intimate understanding of the needs of the business to keep the projects strategically aligned. A project that is beautifully technical deployed but that steers away from being strategically aligned is worse than a technically failed project.
Anish Abraham
Privacy Program Manager| University of Washington
Auburn, Wa, United States
Good article !!! In order to be successful you need both technical skills and soft skills. The personality traits will help you to shape a career in project management. Thanks for sharing, Kiron.
Thanks Sam & Anish!
Kiron
Drew Craig
Sr. Agile & Product Coach| Vanguard
Philadelphia, Pa, United States
Need all 3-wheels to remain balanced (and upright!)
Good article, thanks for sharing Kiron!!
Damian Perera
Monitoring & Evaluation Specialist| Chrysalis
Mellawagedara, Western Province, Sri Lanka
A combination of technical, leadership and strategic & business management expertise is essential to gain success. Resources are abundant. It's a mater of identifying gaps and working for improvement.
Thanks Kiron.
Thanks Eduin, Andrew, Cibin & Damian!
Kiron
Jesus Martheyn
Project Manager SR Lvl 2| Globant
Medellin, Antioquia, Colombia
Hey Kiron, I really enjoy your point of view. Thanks for sharing. I've read two of your blog inputs and they are awesome. Thanks.
Vincent Guerard
Coach - Trainer - Speaker - Advisor| Freelance
Mont-Royal, Quebec, Canada
Nice analogie, I have not master unicycle.
Thanks
The talent triangle is a good way to assess our ability to be a holistic project manager.
Guilherme Caloba
Production Engineer| PETROBRAS
Rio De Janeiro, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
Thank you for this. Inspiring as always!
Sylvain Carrier
Retired| Canadian Forces and Government of Canada
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Interesting article Kiron. I'd like to go back to this part of your text:
"Many of the project managers I’ve met had focused their formal education on technical project management (e.g. risk management, critical chain) earlier in their career but as their experience increased, the focus shifted to enhancing soft skills or in gaining further domain expertise."
We all agree that three wheels are better in general but could the need for the three types of training/development vary over our careers? As we gain experience, maybe we need more strategic training than the other types? Maybe we needed more soft skills training early on (when the technical stuff was fresh)?
The PMI process obviously does not allow to change the proportions over time and am wondering if it should, should it?
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates
New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
I just had the chance to go through your post and I can't agree with you more. I think it is a better system now with the tricycle.
RAJESH K L
Project Manager, PMP| Bharat Electronics, Bengaluru, India
Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Please Login/Register to leave a comment.
|
"If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man."
- Mark Twain
|