Change analysis is not free
From the Easy in theory, difficult in practice Blog
by Kiron Bondale
My musings on project management, project portfolio management and change management.
I'm a firm believer that a pragmatic approach to organizational change that addresses process & technology, but primarily, people will maximize chances for success.
This blog contains articles which I've previously written and published as well as new content.
Recent Posts
Leading Through Crisis Means Leading Through Context
"It's the end. But the moment has been prepared for." - retirement lessons from the Doctor
Just because they are non-critical, doesn't mean they are not risky!
Just because they are non-critical, doesn't mean they are not risky!
How will YOU avoid these AI-related cognitive biases?
Categories
Agile,
Artificial Intelligence,
Career Development,
Change Management,
Communications Management,
Decision Making,
Governance,
Hiring,
Kanban,
Lessons Learned,
Personal Development,
PMO,
Portfolio Management,
Project Management,
Resource Management,
Risk Management,
Risk Management,
Schedule Management,
Scheduling,
Tools
Date
Scope creep is a very well known cause of schedule and cost variances, hence most project managers are vigilant about managing change.
Fewer project managers are conscious of the accumulative costs of change analysis and yet significant effort gets consumed by team members before a change request is ever presented to a decision maker. Baselines are the output of detailed planning and, if performed correctly, change analysis should provide impact estimates at the same level of detail as the project’s original baselines – this takes a lot of effort.
Sometimes it might be the cumulative effort of analyzing a large number of requested changes over a project’s lifetime whereas other times it might be the complexity of a much smaller number of requests that adds up.
The issue with this is that there is usually no cost or schedule allocation made within approved baselines for performing such analysis.
You might consider utilizing contingency reserves to cover such analysis but that would be like using your rainy day fund to get an architectural estimate on a new sunroom for your house – when you need that money for critical roof repairs, it will not be available.
You might feel that projects run using agile methods are immune to this, but even with those, if work item changes are large or frequent, team velocity gets reduced and it takes more iterations than planned to deliver expected business value.
So what can be done?
- It’s a good idea to have an open discussion with your sponsor and other key stakeholders at project outset to help them understand that no matter how clear they feel scope is now, there will be change and they can proactively address how it will be handled.
- As budgets and timelines are being estimated, consider getting reserves approved for handling an expected level of change analysis.
- Finally, if changes are frequent or of high complexity, make sure you are asking your sponsor to approve getting a “quote for a quote” and regularly reinforcing the message that there is a cost to change analysis.
On projects, change may be inevitable, but impact from uncontrolled change analysis doesn’t have to be.
(Note: no change requests were harmed in the original publishing of this article in June 2014 on kbondale.wordpress.com)
Posted on: October 24, 2018 06:59 AM |
Permalink
Comments (19)
Please login or join to subscribe to this item
Very inrteresting article, thanks for sharing
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates
New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
I fully agree with you Kiron, great insights and in fact, this happened with me recently and I did the “What can be done” steps that you’ve mentioned.
Anish Abraham
Privacy Program Manager| University of Washington
Auburn, Wa, United States
Good article, Kiron and thanks for sharing.
Jo Ann Noel
Project Manager| Ministry of Planning
El Dorado, Trinidad and Tobago
Kiron, thanks for this good article but please my dear for the sake of change don't fall in that creep and change your photo we need to see your face shinning don't hide it behind your hand, I know you might be upset of not getting the 100% but for us nothing like to see the smile on your face. Thank you
Riyadh - :-)
Was wondering who'd be first to comment on my double face-palm image. Sure, it's probably time to change it!
Good article, thanks. Just to note on your 2nd point "consider getting reserves approved" that while it may be difficult to do for budget with some clients , PMs should always allow for change analysis in the schedule , typically by controlling the resource allocation for deliverables to allow overhead for change analysis because as you said it is neither free in time nor money.
Lenka Pincot
Chief of Staff to the CEO| Project Management Institute
Paris, France
I wanted to comment on the content but once I read the comments I have to say first thank you for putting your picture back:)
You’re right, change analysis can take a noticeable piece of time and project resources, it should be used wisely and consciously.
Great point, Michael & thanks Lenka - good to know that my Captain Picard alias had outworn his welcome!
Kiron, thanks I have a shining sunny morning today looking at your photo back ;-) and thanks to Linka so I was right and the first one about Kiron's Photo.
Pench Batta
Enterprise Lean Agile DevOps Coach /SAFe Program Consultant (SPC6)| Capgemini, Inc.
Bentonville, Ar, United States
Quite interesting! Thanks for sharing.
Drew Craig
Sr. Agile & Product Coach| Vanguard
Philadelphia, Pa, United States
Thanks Riyadh, Pench & Andrew!
RAJESH K L
Project Manager, PMP| Bharat Electronics, Bengaluru, India
Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
And why should it be FREE?
Warren Nash
PM/PMO Position & SAP Architect| Freelance
Pudong, Shanghai, China, Mainland
Please Login/Register to leave a comment.
|
"Whenever you find that you are on the side of the majority, it is time to reform."
- Mark Twain
|