Project Management

Influencing the eternal optimism of a delivery team

From the Easy in theory, difficult in practice Blog
by
My musings on project management, project portfolio management and change management. I'm a firm believer that a pragmatic approach to organizational change that addresses process & technology, but primarily, people will maximize chances for success. This blog contains articles which I've previously written and published as well as new content.

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

Leading Through Crisis Means Leading Through Context

"It's the end. But the moment has been prepared for." - retirement lessons from the Doctor

Just because they are non-critical, doesn't mean they are not risky!

Just because they are non-critical, doesn't mean they are not risky!

How will YOU avoid these AI-related cognitive biases?

Categories

Agile, Artificial Intelligence, Career Development, Change Management, Communications Management, Decision Making, Governance, Hiring, Kanban, Lessons Learned, Personal Development, PMO, Portfolio Management, Project Management, Resource Management, Risk Management, Risk Management, Schedule Management, Scheduling, Tools

Date

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  

Categories: Agile, Project Management


When I teach agile fundamentals classes, I frequently emphasize the importance of inspection and adaptation. Teams which don't use feedback loops with their products and their processes should not consider themselves to be very agile.

For those teams which use an iteration-based cadence for their delivery such as those who have implemented the Scrum framework there have multiple feedback loops to help them improve. A common example is comparing how many product backlog items they were able to successfully complete during an iteration with how many they had forecast that they would be able to complete at the beginning of the iteration.

For stable teams using fixed duration iterations, a reasonable assumption is that over time the volume of work which they can complete should become progressively more predictable which in turn should improve forecasting.

So what happens when a team consistently misses their iteration forecasts by a significant margin?

If it is a team which regularly completes more work than was forecast, this could be the result of traditional management oversight causing team members to act very cautiously when estimating their work. Letting the team know that it is normal that they might miss their iteration forecasts on occasion and spending effort on making the team feel safe might help them to start making more aggressive forecasts over time.

But what about the team who is frequently completing a lot less than they had forecast?

It would be very easy to write off such teams as undisciplined or immature but such judgments won't help the situation.

There could be many factors causing the team to fall short including:

  • Underestimating work item effort or complexity
  • Insufficient dependency identification
  • Poor risk management
  • A lack of focus caused by multitasking or other sources of distraction

A retrospective provides a safe place to identify the situation and to come up with improvement suggestions which the team can take into their next planning session.

This might also provide a good opportunity for the product owner to express some sadness that the team wasn't able to meet their forecast and to help them understand how this could reduce their credibility in the eyes of key stakeholders.

Regardless of the cause, understanding why the team is over-forecasting is an important step as that information can then be used to create a sense of urgency regarding this behavior.

 

 


Posted on: May 26, 2019 07:00 AM | Permalink

Comments (11)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
avatar
Abolfazl Yousefi Darestani Manager, Quality and Continuous Improvement| Hörmann-TNR Industrial Doors Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
Makes sense. Thank you for sharing

avatar
Abolfazl Yousefi Darestani Manager, Quality and Continuous Improvement| Hörmann-TNR Industrial Doors Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
Great. Thank you for sharing

avatar
Drew Craig Sr. Agile & Product Coach| Vanguard Philadelphia, Pa, United States
Certainly a dance and can be a team journey to find the sweet spot without under or over committing. Thanks, Kiron.

avatar
Kiron Bondale Retired | Mentor| Retired Welland, Ontario, Canada
Thanks Abolfazl and Andrew!

avatar
Eduin Fernando Valdes Alvarado Project Manager| F y F Fabricamos Futuro Villavicencio, Meta, Colombia
Thanks for sharing

avatar
Kiron Bondale Retired | Mentor| Retired Welland, Ontario, Canada
Thanks Eduin!

avatar
SHADAV MOHAMMAD ANSARI PMO| ITC INFOTECH INDIA PVT. Ltd. New Delhi, Delhi, India
Agree with your points. Thanks for sharing nice post.

avatar
Kiron Bondale Retired | Mentor| Retired Welland, Ontario, Canada
Thanks Shadav!

avatar
Anish Abraham Privacy Program Manager| University of Washington Auburn, Wa, United States
Good one, Kiron and I agree with you on this. Thanks for sharing.

avatar
Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD Senior Project Manager| Infosys Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Thanks for the post Kiron. I guess there are two competing demands here; one is the actual forecast and how important it is, and the other is the delivery of value. If a team produces very little but can forecast it accurately, is that as valuable as a team that produces a lot but is lousy at forecasting? Ideally, we would want both forecast accuracy and high output. The points Kiron made here go a long way to making that achievable.

avatar
Abhishek Sharma Vice President| Change Healthcare Austin, Tx, United States
good perspectives. thanks for sharing

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS

"Don't compromise yourself. You are all you've got."

- Janis Joplin

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors