Project Management

Why to use the word capacity instead of resource when referring to people

From the Manifesting Business Agility Blog
by
This blog concerns itself with organizations moving to business agility—the quick realization of value predictably and sustainably, and with high quality. It includes all aspects of this—from the business stakeholders through ops and support. Topics will be far-reaching but will mostly discuss FLEX, Flow, Lean-Thinking, Lean-Management, Theory of Constraints, Systems Thinking, Test-First and Agile.

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

What is a Lean-Agile Coach?

My Approach to Sensemaking in Knowledge Work

Why if you are a PMP who understands the value of Agile your next workshop should be the Disciplined Agile Value Stream Consultant

My views (past posts) on cause and effect in complex systems

Transcend the thinking that scope, time and cost are in opposition to each other with Lean-Thinking

Categories

lean, value streams

Date

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  


There are many in the Agile community that believe referring to people as resources’ is insulting. I know many people in non-Agile communities that don’t mean to be demeaning when they refer to people as resources. To be safe, I typically never call people resources.

But there’s another reason not to call people resources’. When you have “resources” it makes sense to utilize them, even over utilize them. This is the wrong focus for Flow and Lean.  We are not trying to utilize things as over utilization causes many problems.

We are trying to use whatever capacity we have on the most important tasks.  So instead of resources, I do more than just calling people 'people'. I always talk about capacity. This not only will not be interpreted negatively, it reminds us that people have a certain level of capacity.  We can more easily understand that overloading capacity is bad than we can understand that over utilization is bad.


Posted on: December 03, 2019 12:17 PM | Permalink

Comments (10)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
avatar
Kiron Bondale Retired | Mentor| Retired Welland, Ontario, Canada
This is spot on, Al, and why I have a sticker on my laptop which says "If you mean PEOPLE, say "People" (Not "Resources") - Let's make people awesome!"

Kiron

avatar
Mihaela Duceag Supervisor - Projects and Analysis| Peel Regional Police Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
I use "team members" or talent.

avatar
Deepesh Rammoorthy ICT Project Manager ( PMP®AgilePM®Certified ScrumMaster® (CSM®))| Australian Red Cross Blood Service Tarneit, Vic, Australia
Need to reinforce the alternatives .....All too often we are stuck on the common term "Resources".

avatar
Khai Ng. IT PMO | IT Project Manager| TTGROUP Hanoi, Viet Nam
If you use "Capacity" when referring to People then what term are you going to use to refer to the real capacity of people when participating in executing project tasks? It is very confused!

avatar
Al Shalloway Founder and CEO| Success Engineering Edmonds, Wa, United States
actually, i guess i'm saying talk about the capacity you have and not the people. let me see if i can rewrite it.
When i talk about getting things done i typically just talk about the capacity I have. it seems to work well.

avatar
Farooq Ali Pakistan
Thanks for giving us this interesting approach!....I agree with you

avatar
Drew Craig Sr. Agile & Product Coach| Vanguard Philadelphia, Pa, United States
Agree with the overall sentiment. There is a negative connotation with the term resources. There are different options to take when speaking of the individuals, whether from a talent or capacity perspective.

avatar
Eduin Fernando Valdes Alvarado Project Manager| F y F Fabricamos Futuro Villavicencio, Meta, Colombia
Thanks for sharing

avatar
Luis Branco CEO| Business Insight, Consultores de Gestão, Ldª Carcavelos, Lisboa, Portugal
Dear Al
I am one of those people who believe referring to people as resources is insulting.
I prefer to call Talent, or Knowledge Workers or People

Everyone is different and the pace and dexterity with which they perform as their activities varies from person to person.

I can agree with one perspective:
The ability to perform a certain amount of work is limited.

avatar
Al Shalloway Founder and CEO| Success Engineering Edmonds, Wa, United States
I am not surprised. I guess I don't get insulted because I think there should be intent to be insulted. This alone is a reason to not use the word resources - people often do not understand intent.

But the other point is we don't want anyone to think of talent, people whatever as things to be utilized - no matter what we call them. :)

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS

"There's nothing remarkable about it. All one has to do is hit the right keys at the right time and the instrument plays itself."

- Johann Sebastian Bach

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors