Project Management

The requirements both for an approach and for its Architecture

From the Manifesting Business Agility Blog
by
This blog concerns itself with organizations moving to business agility—the quick realization of value predictably and sustainably, and with high quality. It includes all aspects of this—from the business stakeholders through ops and support. Topics will be far-reaching but will mostly discuss FLEX, Flow, Lean-Thinking, Lean-Management, Theory of Constraints, Systems Thinking, Test-First and Agile.

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

What is a Lean-Agile Coach?

My Approach to Sensemaking in Knowledge Work

Why if you are a PMP who understands the value of Agile your next workshop should be the Disciplined Agile Value Stream Consultant

My views (past posts) on cause and effect in complex systems

Transcend the thinking that scope, time and cost are in opposition to each other with Lean-Thinking

Categories

lean, value streams

Date

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  


Any approach to Agile at scale must attend to the following:

  1. Organizations need a well-defined place to start
  2. Since no one size fits all this starting point must be tailored to the organization adopting it
  3. The process of tailoring must be done in conjunction with the people doing the work
  4. The process of tailoring the starting point should also teach how to do ongoing improvement

Architecture for an approach must enable content to be presented while:

  • Avoiding cognitive overload
  • Being sufficient
  • Being extensible
  • Never having the addition or subtraction of a process that is useful be grounds for saying you’re no longer doing the approach

Developers of this architecture know

  • That the content is always incomplete
  • We live in a complex world
  • Must provide a way to get feedback on all decisions/practices as to whether it was useful, not useful or if something is missing

The general attitude follows George Box’s mantra – “all models are wrong, some are useful.” 


Posted on: August 06, 2020 05:38 PM | Permalink

Comments (3)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
avatar
Ashleigh Kennett-Smith ICT Project Manager| Australian Red Cross Lifeblood Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Very neat encapsulation Al!

I think one of the difficulties with any approach that allows change to occur to the delivery method and controls, is that we still need to provide some boundaries and controls to ensure fit for use and fit for purpose are still met. It's the "we don't care how you do it" that makes it difficult. Because we must be able demonstrate that we only release changes that truly meet requirements (including regulatory, quality, scalability, security etc)

avatar
Eduin Fernando Valdes Alvarado Project Manager| F y F Fabricamos Futuro Villavicencio, Meta, Colombia
Thanks for sharing

avatar
Jean-Claude Greco Sierre, Valais, Switzerland
Thanks for sharing

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS

"Opera is where a guy gets stabbed in the back, and instead of dying, he sings."

- Robert Benchley

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors