Project Management

Tomorrow (Almost) Never Comes

From the Helping Project Managers to Help Themselves Blog
by
I'm all about Building Thriving Leaders™ This blog is based on over 35 years of project management and leadership successes and failures. Get practical, concise nuggets on both hard and soft skills to help you deliver projects successfully with minimal friction.

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

Knowledge and Wisdom: What's the Difference?

I Just Wanna Be a PM!

The Straight A’s of Intentional Leadership

Ten Ways to Grow your Followers into Leaders

Ten Points to be a Better Up and Out Influencer

Categories

Agile, Career Development, Communications Management, Decision Making, Disability Inclusion, Empowerment, Followership, Leadership, New Job, project execution, Project Management, project sponsorship, Social Media, Time Management, Upward Management, Work Life Balance, Working from Home, Writing

Date

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  


Tom looked at the clock.

“Midnight,” he said to himself as he took a sip of coffee. The milestone review for the second phase of the project was the next day. As he updated the project plan, he came across the organizational change management tasks that were supposed to be done in phase one that got pushed to phase two. He saw that the tasks were still zero percent complete.

“We’ll pick them up later,” he said to himself as he added the tasks to the phase three workplan.

During the milestone review the next day, Tom’s manager, Gayle, asked about the incomplete organizational change management tasks.

“Ran out of time,” Tom said. “We’ll get them done in phase three.”

“Isn’t that what you told me three months ago during our phase one review?” Gayle asked.

Tom looked down. “Um, yeah,” he said.

“Phase three is even more intense than phase two, what makes you think you’ll get the OCM tasks done in phase three if you didn’t get them done in phase one or two?”

“Gayle, we’ll get them done,” Tom said.

“OK, I’m holding you to it, Tom.”

Three months later, at the phase three milestone review, Tom walked through the workplan, then got to the OCM tasks. Tom knew what was coming.

“Still not done,” Gayle said as Tom avoided her gaze.

~~~~~

Before we go any further, I want to articulate a principle that I’ve not only seen in countless projects but also experienced personally:

The closer you get to a project delivery date, the less time you have to complete tasks kicked down the road from prior project phases.

It’s rare that availability to do work increases as the project gets closer to its final delivery date, and that tasks deferred throughout the project now have extra time to get done. Typically, the project team is working hard to accomplish the only-most-crucial tasks to meet delivery, with other tasks either deferred to post-release or not done at all. The attitude is that those tasks can be completed later when there’s more time. I have two problems with this:

  1. If the task was important enough to include in the original plan, then why is it now unimportant enough to be pushed to tomorrow (or not done at all?)
  2. Tomorrow (almost) never comes.

To avoid the temptation of kicking tasks down the road only to have them die on the vine, give these five takeaways a look:

  1. Don’t short-change planning – Pick your quote: Fail to plan, plan to fail; You don’t have time to do it right, but you always have time to do it over; Measure twice, cut once. The bottom line is to have a realistic and believable plan that focuses on deliverables, has an understood critical path, specifically named task owners (not “the team”), and clear dates. Just make sure the plan supports the project and doesn’t become a project in and of itself.
  2. Resist the urge to push tasks off – OK, sometimes hard choices need to be made and something might need to get pushed off to a later date. This becomes a problem when it’s the rule more than the exception. If you chronically push tasks off because you’ve run out of time, perhaps something in your planning needs to change.
  3. When you have to push tasks off, articulate the implications – Putting something off until later or cutting the task altogether means the project will incur some incremental risk (assuming the task was value-added in the first place). Have mitigation in place for managing any incremental risk.
  4. Adjust the plan when things hit the fan – I’ve seen it many times: a project starts out great, the plan is reviewed on a regular basis, life is good. Then something goes wrong. More often than not, the plan either doesn’t get updated to reflect reality or it gets abandoned altogether. Keep the plan current and drive decisions on hard choices when tasks must be deferred. Just remember to articulate the implications (see takeaway 3) of the choice. Keep the plan current and realistic.
  5. If it’s truly not necessary, then cut it – When planning your project, do a reality scrub to ensure only must-need tasks are included. Ask yourself, “What’s the consequence if this task isn’t done?” If there’s no clear consequence, then consider not doing it. Just make sure the project team agrees with cutting the task before it goes in the shredder.

Remember, the closer you get to a project delivery date, the less time you have to complete tasks kicked down the road. Resist the urge to push tasks off until tomorrow, because tomorrow almost never comes.


Posted on: December 02, 2021 12:00 AM | Permalink

Comments (10)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
avatar
Michael Edward Putnam Founder| MEP Project Focus LLC Westerville, Oh, United States
Thanks for your valuable post, Lonnie. I've seen this scenario play out multiple times. Think of the impact on your credibility and that of your team before you push tasks to the next phase. Also, I would add that when tasks do need to be pushed, highlight how this impacts project risk to your key stakeholders prior to your milestone review. That way you have time to adjust your plan and don't surprise stakeholders at the review.

avatar
Luis Branco CEO| Business Insight, Consultores de Gestão, Ldª Carcavelos, Lisboa, Portugal
Dear Lonnie
Very interesting theme that brought to our reflection and debate
Thanks for sharing and your opinions.

You wrote: "because tomorrow almost never comes".
I understand your perspective and I agree. (Procrastinating takes us to a dead end)
On the other hand, what is planning if not an attempt to predict what will be done tomorrow?

avatar
Neil Selover Modesto, Ca, United States
Thanks, good article.

My takeaway: “...make sure the plan supports the project and doesn’t become a project in and of itself.“

I’ve too often seen plans done by rote when governance and good practices are considered by sponsors to be getting in the way of writing code, and we all know how useful those plans were, and how those projects worked out.

avatar
S Balasubramanian Sector Head (OPEX) , Power Business Unit| Tata Consulting Engineers Limited Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Very true and keeps getting played out time and again

avatar
Bilal Munawar Lead Instrumentation & Control Engineer| SMEC Oil & Gas (Pvt.) Ltd. Islamabad, Pakistan
Nice article, thanks for sharing, Lonnie.

I believe the first point 'Don’t short-change planning' is the most important. My experience with Project Plans is that mostly these are prepared considering project milestones without much consideration for actual time needed for activities and inputs required for deliverables. If Project Plan is prepared realistically with consideration of time required for intermediary activities, then there is less probability of tasks being kicked down the road.

avatar
Cade Timbers Sr. Project Engineer| WORLEY Tx, United States
An excellent distillation of the risks of putting things off and a good list of ways to avoid the pile-up at the end of the project. I think the last one is an important one to understand. Plans change. Priorities change. There are things that are put on a project plan or deliverable list early on that actually are not critical. They are nice to haves, or we thought they were needed when we started out. If you are in a budget crisis, it is valid to review your obligations and get rid of scope if it is not necessary. And by 'get rid of', I mean get rid of it. Once the decision is made to cut it, then formally cut it. If it is not needed, then spending any amount of additional effort thinking about or discussing the item is wasteful and is also taking resources from tasks that are critical and which you are already under pressure to deliver.

avatar
Lucy Owen FE fundinfo United Kingdom
In my experience those tasks pushed to post-live never get done as the next priority always trumps them. Not sure why they are even included sometimes like you say!

avatar
Trish Brimblecombe Project Manager| Whitireia Community Polytechnic Ltd Porirua, Wellington, New Zealand
Thanks Lonnie - excellent article and some great reminders.

avatar
Ma Bin Risk Consultant| IBM China, Mainland
do not give up easily, make things happen

avatar
Stéphane Parent Self Employed / Semi-retired| Leader Maker Prince Edward Island, Canada
Another lesson learned regarding organizational change management: assign dedicated people to those activities. If we expect other project team members to pick them up when they have time, they will never get done.

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS

"If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange apples then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas."

- George Bernard Shaw

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors