Project Management

Safety is a prerequisite for effective non-solo work

From the Easy in theory, difficult in practice Blog
by
My musings on project management, project portfolio management and change management. I'm a firm believer that a pragmatic approach to organizational change that addresses process & technology, but primarily, people will maximize chances for success. This blog contains articles which I've previously written and published as well as new content.

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

Leading Through Crisis Means Leading Through Context

"It's the end. But the moment has been prepared for." - retirement lessons from the Doctor

Just because they are non-critical, doesn't mean they are not risky!

Just because they are non-critical, doesn't mean they are not risky!

How will YOU avoid these AI-related cognitive biases?

Categories

Agile, Artificial Intelligence, Career Development, Change Management, Communications Management, Decision Making, Governance, Hiring, Kanban, Lessons Learned, Personal Development, PMO, Portfolio Management, Project Management, Resource Management, Risk Management, Risk Management, Schedule Management, Scheduling, Tools

Date

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  

Categories: Agile, Project Management


When we consider the benefits of non-solo working approaches such as pair programming or mobbing, the ones which normally come to mind are related to improvements in the speed or quality of delivery. The old adage "two heads are better than one" applies as we are usually able to get more work completed faster and with fewer defects. And by injecting variety by having participants alternate between different roles frequently, we also reduce the likelihood of fatigue.

But an HBR article this week on the topic of disengagement caught my attention. The author suggested that finding someone to hold us accountable increases the likelihood of our completing an activity. She highlights the benefits of body doubling where we work in the physical or virtual presence of another. By working with someone as opposed to by ourselves, it reduces the chance of procrastination and distraction.

While I hadn't thought about this before, it makes perfect sense. By pairing up with someone else who can see what we are working on, it is a lot harder for us to tune out. The discussions we will have with our partner will also help to keep us focused and alert so long as both of us are not likely to get distracted by the same thing - this is where strategic pairing where we pick partners based on diversity of thought and background might help.

But without psychological safety, we will be less likely to explore creative ways of getting the work done and we might also lack the courage to provide direct, compassionate feedback to our partner. This is quite likely when the people we work with are at different levels of seniority, experience or influence than us.

Many of the same practices which apply to building psychological safety within a team could be applied in the context of pairing. We could take some time before we start to work with a new partner to define a few ground rules for how we will work together including how we will provide feedback. At the end of a pairing session, take a few minutes to share our perceptions of how the session went and what we might want to adjust going forward. And solicit and be willing to share our working anti-patterns so that we can watch out for one another.

So while there are many benefits to be gained by engaging in non-solo work, psychological safety is a prerequisite for realizing most of them.


Posted on: February 06, 2022 07:00 AM | Permalink

Comments (3)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
avatar
Luis Branco CEO| Business Insight, Consultores de Gestão, Ldª Carcavelos, Lisboa, Portugal
Dear Kiron
The topic is very interesting and brings to our reflection and debate.
Thank you for sharing, for your opinions and for the book suggestion.

When a person has maturity (in the work he does* and psychologically) he does not need another person to be responsible for the work and to complete it within the agreed standards.

It is also not clear to me that, working in pairs, the productivity is greater and the result is better.

*Learning is an important element of maturity

avatar
Kiron Bondale Retired | Mentor| Retired Welland, Ontario, Canada
Luis -

I'd agree that many people are going at being accountable to themselves for the work they do, but that was just one of the many benefits associated with non-solo work. If the work to be done is complicated or complex (i.e. not simple) and if both workers share similar goals for completing the work to an expected degree of quality, then a non-solo approach can result in faster and better quality outcomes.

Kiron

avatar
Stephen Robin Project Analyst Trainee| Ministry of Works and Transport Arima, Ari, Trinidad and Tobago
Very good article Kiron. The attention toward safety reminds me of a keynote by a lecturer in my college that showed concern for the lack of health and safety practices in the PMBOK. Pairing up with someone is an effective way to receive immediate feedback and observe your work however efficient in real-time.

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS

"Judge a man by his questions rather than his answers."

- Voltaire

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors