Project Management

Do You Have the Courage to Break the Process?

From the Voices on Project Management Blog
by , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Voices on Project Management offers insights, tips, advice and personal stories from project managers in different regions and industries. The goal is to get you thinking, and spark a discussion. So, if you read something that you agree with--or even disagree with--leave a comment.

About this Blog

RSS

View Posts By:

Cameron McGaughy
Lynda Bourne
Kevin Korterud
Peter Tarhanidis
Conrado Morlan
Jen Skrabak
Mario Trentim
Christian Bisson
Yasmina Khelifi
Sree Rao
Soma Bhattacharya
Emily Luijbregts
David Wakeman
Ramiro Rodrigues
Wanda Curlee
Lenka Pincot
cyndee miller
Jorge Martin Valdes Garciatorres
Marat Oyvetsky

Past Contributors:

Rex Holmlin
Vivek Prakash
Dan Goldfischer
Linda Agyapong
Jim De Piante
Siti Hajar Abdul Hamid
Bernadine Douglas
Michael Hatfield
Deanna Landers
Kelley Hunsberger
Taralyn Frasqueri-Molina
Alfonso Bucero Torres
Marian Haus
Shobhna Raghupathy
Peter Taylor
Joanna Newman
Saira Karim
Jess Tayel
Lung-Hung Chou
Rebecca Braglio
Roberto Toledo
Geoff Mattie

Recent Posts

The 4 P’s of Successful Modern PMs

Do You Ask Too Many Questions to Your Team as a Project Manager?

Who Is Your Backup PM?

The Importance of Strategic Management for Technical Program Managers

3 Ways to Think About Risk

Categories

2020, Adult Development, Adult Development, Agile, Agile, Agile, Agile, Agile, Agile, Agile, Agile, Agile, Agile, agile, Agile management, Agile;Community;Talent management, Artificial Intelligence, Backlog, Basics, Benefits Realization, Best Practices, Best Practices, Best Practices, Best Practices, Best Practices, BIM, Business Analysis, Business Transformation, Business Transformation, Calculating Project Value, Canvas, Canvas, Career Development, Career Development, Categories: Career Help, Change Management, Cloud Computing, Collaboration, Collaboration, Collaboration, Collaboration, Collaboration, Collaboration, Collaboration, Collaboration, Collaboration, Collaboration, Collaboration, Collaboration, Collaboration, Collaboration, Collaboration, Collaboration, Collaboration, Collaboration, Collaboration, Collaboration, Collaboration, Collaboration, Communication, Complexity, Conflict, Conflict Management, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, Continuous Learning, COVID-19, Crises, Crisis Management, critical success factors, Cultural Awareness, Culture, Decision Making, Design Thinking, Digital Transformation, Digital Transformation, digital transformation, digital transformation, Digitalisation, Disruption, Disruption, Disruption, Diversity, Documentation, Earned Value Management, Education, EEWH, Enterprise Risk Management, Escalation management, Estimating, Ethics, execution, Expectations Management, Facilitation, feasibility studies, Future, Future of Project Management, Generational PM, Governance, Government, green building, Growth, Horizontal Development, Horizontal Development, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Aspects of PM, Human Resources, Inclusion, Innovation, Intelligent Building, International, Internet of Things (IOT), Internet of Things (IoT), IOT, IOT, IT Project Management, Knowledge, Knowledge, Leadership, lean construction, LEED, Lessons Learned, Lessons learned;Retrospective, Managing for Stakeholders, managing stakeholders as clients, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Mentoring, Methodology, Methodology, Metrics, Micromanagement, Microsoft Project PPM, Motivation, Negotiation, Negotiation, Negotiation, Neuroscience, neuroscience, New Practitioners, Nontraditional Project Management, OKR, Online Learning, opportunity, Organizational Project Management, Pandemic, People, People management, Planing, planning, PM & the Economy, PM History, PM Think About It, PMBOK Guide, PMI, PMI EMEA 2018, PMI EMEA Congress 2017, PMI EMEA Congress 2017, PMI EMEA Congress 2019, PMI EMEA Congress 2019, PMI EMEA Congress 2019, PMI Global Conference 2017, PMI Global Conference 2017, PMI Global Conference 2017, PMI Global Conference 2018, PMI Global Conference 2018, PMI Global Conference 2018, PMI Global Conference 2019, PMI Global Conference 2019, PMI Global Congress 2010 - North America, PMI Global Congress 2011 - EMEA, PMI Global Congress 2011 - North America, PMI Global Congress 2012 - EMEA, PMI Global Congress 2012 - North America, PMI Global Congress 2013 - EMEA, PMI Global Congress 2013 - North America, PMI Global Congress 2014 - EMEA, PMI Global Congress 2014 - North America, PMI Global Congress 2014 - North America, PMI GLobal Congress EMEA 2018, PMI PMO Symposium 2012, PMI PMO Symposium 2013, PMI PMO Symposium 2015, PMI PMO Symposium 2016, PMI PMO Symposium 2016, PMI PMO Symposium 2016, PMI PMO Symposium 2017, PMI PMO Symposium 2018, PMI PMO Symposium 2018, PMI PMO Symposium 2018, PMI Pulse of the Profession, PMO, PMO, PMO, PMO, PMO, pmo, pmo, PMO Project Management Office, portfolio, portfolio, Portfolio Management, Portfolio Management, Portfolio Management, Portfolio Management, Portfolio Management, portfolio management, Portfolios (PPM), presentations, Priorities, Probability, Probability, Problem Structuring Methods, Problem Structuring Methods, Process, Procurement, profess, Program Management, Programs (PMO), project, project, Project Delivery, Project Dependencies, Project Failure, project failure, Project Leadership, Project Management, Project Management, Project Management, project management, project management, project management, project management, project management office, Project Planning, project planning, Project Requirements, Project Success, Project Success, Ransomware, Reflections on the PM Life, Remote, Remote Work, Requirements Management, Research Conference 2010, Researching the Value of Project Management, Resiliency, Risk, Risk Management, Risk Management, Risk Management, Risk management, risk management, risk management, ROI, Roundtable, Salary Survey, Scheduling, Scope, Scrum, search, SelfLeadership, SelfLeadership, SelfLeadership, SelfLeadership, SelfLeadership, SelfLeadership, SelfLeadership, SelfLeadership, SelfLeadership, SelfLeadership, SelfLeadership, SelfLeadership, SelfLeadership, SelfLeadership, SelfLeadership, SelfLeadership, SelfLeadership, SelfLeadership, SelfLeadership, SelfLeadership, Servant Leadership, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Sharing Knowledge, Social Responsibility, Sponsorship, Stakeholder, Stakeholder Management, Stakeholder Management, stakeholder management, stakeholder management, Strategy, Strategy, Strategy, swot, Talent Management, Talent Management Leadership SelfLeadership Collaboration Communication, Talent Management Leadership SelfLeadership Collaboration Communication, Talent Management Leadership SelfLeadership Collaboration Communication, Taskforce, Team Building, Teams, Teams in Agile, teamwork, Tech, Technical Debt, Technology, TED Talks, The Project Economy, The Project Economy, The Project Economy, The Project Economy, Time, Timeline, Tools, tools, Transformation, Transformation, transformation, Transition, Trust, Value, Vertical Development, Vertical Development, Volunteering, Volunteering, Volunteering, Volunteering #Leadership #SelfLeadership, Volunteering Sharing Knowledge Leadership SelfLeadership Collaboration Trust, VUCA, VUCA, Women in PM, Women in Project Management, Women in Project Management

Date


Categories: Agile


By Soma Bhattacharya

The entire purpose of creating a process is to ensure that the roadmap is followed. Everything is supposed to unfold as planned and predicted. 

But following the status quo has always been a problem for me, because we should have the courage to break it when we know it can be done better. In most cases we don’t, because that’s how we are mentally wired. 

Why do we follow the regular path? Why do we never think of breaking the process? I recently read the book The Pathless Path: Imagining a New Story for Work and Life by Paul Millerd, and that led me to believe that there are people who are questioning the status quo (of course, the percentage is very low, but still there). 

Process in most organizations or teams is something that, once determined, is just part of the routine. Numbers and reports come up every month, but no one takes the time to actually look at and question them. When that’s the path we take, the meaning of every ceremony or sync-up or meeting gets lost. Now we just do them because we are supposed to. 

So, does the process really lead you anywhere? Self-discovery? Team bonding? Dynamic teamwork? Better thinking? If the answer is no, it’s time to change the process.

Process for me triggers thinking. So instead of looking into the “tasks to get done” every day, do you want to replace it with something else? Maybe look at team deliverables with detailed data? When you run a team survey, do you want to include sensitive questions like, “Are you experiencing burnout?” And instead of pushing back the evitable, we try to create a system that allows everyone to develop insights into their own (and the team’s) performance. 

Here are some things to think about:

  1. Replace the standard three daily standup questions with better questions, so the work you do is acknowledged. Focus on the work done as much as you focus on what needs to get done.

  2. Team retrospectives can be done with anonymous surveys to bring out better inputs that actually improve team health. Remember, happier teams = better outputs.

  3. During planning, look at how much churn happens every sprint, and why. What can be done to reduce it? Is any rework taking a toll on teams?

  4. Encourage everyone to question the planning, and come up with better plans (especially the newcomers—they need to feel engaged and listened to).

  5. Don’t be afraid to bring in a new way of thinking or planning if it works for everyone. 

Agile is for everyone, not just for team leads and domain experts. When everyone participates, they feel included and acknowledged—and the process brings out the best.          

Posted by Soma Bhattacharya on: September 07, 2023 12:13 PM | Permalink

Comments (6)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
Dear Soma
The topic you brought to our reflection and debate is very interesting.
Thank you for sharing and for your questions

Thanks for sharing.

I definitely agree with you! To overcome many disadvantages of traditional way (process based) of working, we welcome the new way of working as Agile. I see no reason to prevent us from discovering, innovating, and applying new things. Things created yesterday can be totally replaced by new things. Processes created by us then we have all rights to follow, break, replace them as needed.

Thank you for sharing Soma.

Is it really all about courage?

Thanks, SOMA,

Breaking a process in Agile is an iterative and collaborative effort that aims to deliver value more effectively and efficiently. It's essential to involve the team, gather data, and prioritize changes based on their impact on the project's success and alignment with Agile principles.

Should the process be agile or fixed?

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS

"I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception."

- Groucho Marx

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors