Project Management

Project Risks Are Binary, So Why Don’t We Treat Them That Way?

From the AI IQ Blog
by
Technology offers an incredible opportunity to improve project performance. This blog shares the latest research and how organizations are implementing AI into their project methodology. Come with an open mind, increase your knowledge, share your concerns, and become a project manager with new skills to offer an organization.

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

Three Common Questions About AI in Project Management

The Growing Gap Between Project Complexity and Project Management Capability

How AI Can Improve Executive Confidence in Major Projects

Will AI Change the Need for Project Managers?

Is ChatGPT Lying or Are We Asking the Wrong Question?

Categories

AI, Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, Machine learning, Natural language processing, procurement, Scope Management

Date

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  


Although there are numerous methods for assessing project risks, they are still based on calculating a probability and impact. This is a 1980s concept that needs a fresh perspective. When you look at the list of project risks for a completed project, they either happened (1) or did not happen (0).  This is proof that risks are binary. As the world moves rapidly to a data-driven approach that takes advantage of AI technology, there needs to be a new paradigm for managing project risks.  Using data and AI tools means identifying the exact conditions if the risk will occur or will not occur. In other words, the probability is either 100 percent or 0. 

Risks are Not Random Events

Risks are not random events. Games of chance are random. A winning lottery number is (hopefully) randomly generated. Project risks are based on factors in the internal and external environment, where if there is sufficient data and data analysis, a binary decision can be made for probability. This process is available now for infrastructure projects and is popular in the UK. Having people assign a probability to a risk is full of human bias, adding another subjective value to our project plans. AI software that is trained to analyze risks reduces or eliminates this bias.

For skeptics who think risks are random events, here is my analogy. There was a significant wind storm recently, and I was worried that a large tree in front of my home would fall over and create damage.  The winds were 60 mph (80 km/hr.).  The tree was swaying and bending severely with each gust.  However, the risk was binary.  Either the tree would survive, or it would break and fall. To determine the binary result, I could gather data on the exact type of tree, height, width, age, number of branches, and soil conditions for the roots.  Then, I collect data for similar trees and the results when faced with identical wind conditions.  That determines the binary risk of the tree surviving.  What about a situation where the probability indicates a 20 percent risk of the tree falling over? Is that a realistic probability or a lack of data. There is a new way to manage project risks in a digital world.  The data needs to be collected, and that will be an arduous task until there is a critical mass that generates statistically significant results.

Making Project Risks Binary

The first step to a binary risk plan is to collect risk data.  Historical data, the current project conditions, and the future project environment are three categories of data necessary for binary risk management.  The process starts by collecting historical data.

  • The specific risk
  • The project conditions
  • The environmental conditions
  • Whether the risk occurred or did not occur

The next step is to identify the risks in the current project and gather data about the project and environmental conditions.  Once the data is collected, a machine learning algorithm uses classification to analyze risks to determine if they will or will not occur.

Does the process have to be perfect?  For now, we only need to be better than the old processes.  Using regression analysis, it is always possible to incorrectly classify a risk.  However, with accurate predictions, risks either become part of the project scope, schedule, and budget baseline or are ignored.  There is an argument that we cannot predict the future.  Yet, we know if we go outside when it is raining, we get wet.  We make predictions all the time, even for events that have not happened to us before.  If we walk in front of a fast-moving vehicle, we will get injured.  We cannot predict the future perfectly, but we can use AI technology to be more accurate at making these predictions.

Welcome to the new world of project risk management, where we replace human bias with advanced statistical methods that use AI technology.

 

 

 

 


Posted on: March 11, 2024 12:00 AM | Permalink

Comments (5)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
avatar
Manar AlGhamdi Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
I like it!

avatar
Shakeel Anwar Bhatti Abu Dhabi, , United Arab Emirates
Great Article. Thanks for sharing, Paul.

avatar
Kwiyuh Michael Wepngong
Community Champion
Financial Management Specialist | US Peace Corps Yaounde, Centre, Cameroon
Thanks Sir

avatar
Aaron Porter
Community Champion
IT Director| Blade HQ Payson, UT, United States
Am I reading this correctly, that you're saying that if people change their behavior, the use of AI will improve risk management? Call it an oversimplification, but that is the message that stands out to me. If that is what you're saying, I would counter with the generalization that people changing their behavior will improve risk management. Do we need AI to run regression analysis, or do we already have tools for this and other forms of statistical analysis? I would say that we need to be allowed more time for proper risk analysis to improve risk management. I'm not sure there will ever be enough data to accurately predict where and when lightning will strike and whether a given strike will start a wildfire. There is some randomness to risk.

Your article is aspirational. I applaud that, but at the same time my cynical side cringes a little at the idea of a new tool that is supposed to solve "people" problems. Lately, my motto has been festina lente - make haste slowly. I've seen a lot of opposition to the idea that we need to slow down for a little bit in order to speed up more effectively. The need to "go faster, now!" gets in the way of having enough data to make truly informed decisions, which would speed up quality decision-making.

We don't have to wait for perfect data to start using AI to help with risk management today. We don't even need to use it for statistics. In my experience, many stakeholders don't want to spend a lot of time on risk management. I've had several projects where I was able to use AI to prime the pump on risks AND mitigations. We ended up with more risks identified and were able to focus on impactful risks. The AI results weren't perfect, but they're not meant to be, at least not according to the training I've received.

avatar
Surupa Chakravarty Business Development Manager| Infosys Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Aspirational

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS

"Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't."

- Margaret Thatcher

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors