Wading Into the Deep Waters of Regulatory Compliance
|
By Conrado Morlan During the 2016 Summer Olympics in Rio de Janeiro, you may have seen them on TV: men around the Olympic pool in red trunks and yellow t-shirts, with whistles around their necks and flotation devices tucked beneath their arms. Yes, they were lifeguards. Why are lifeguards needed in a pool where the world’s best swimmers are competing? The answer is simple: regulatory compliance. FINA, the sport’s international governing body, states in its guidelines that “owners of public pools or pools restricted only to training and competition must comply with the requirements established by law and the health authorities in the country where the pool is situated.” The law in the state of Rio de Janeiro requires the presence of lifeguards at swimming pools larger than 20 feet by 20 feet, according to The New York Times. As a project manager leading the efforts of a global or regional project, you will need to be aware of all the regulations that may impact your project. Assuming that you can lead a project in the same way you do in your country of origin is a bad assumption. Preparing for Compliance Complying with regulations can mean big hurdles in project deployment, so you need to plan ahead to avoid any major impacts. At the same time, regulations may be an opportunity to establish relationships with governmental entities that define the regulations (as Amway did in China in the last decade). When dealing with regulations in your projects, remember:
As a global project manager, you need to develop and master your cultural awareness. This will help you to establish the foundation of communication and identify cultural values, beliefs and perceptions. This will help you understand the local environment and market, build long-term, trusting relationships and keep your project in track. As a global project manager, how do you face regulatory compliance in different countries? |
Qualitative Risk Analysis: Don’t Lose Your Objectivity
|
Objective vs. Subjective Analysis Subjective analysis is based on personal opinions, interpretation, points of view, emotions and judgment. It is often ill-suited for decision making and, in particular, for risk analysis. Objective analysis is fact-based, measurable and observable. For qualitative risk analysis that means using scales to evaluate risk, whether textual (low, medium, high), color-coded (green, yellow, red) or numeric (from 1 to 5), or some combination of these. Getting Qualitative Risk Analysis Right Consider this all-to-common scenario: In a project team meeting to assess risks, the only available information is the risk name and the words high, medium and low. Because there is no definition on what high, medium and low mean, and because there is not enough information about individual risks, the risk analysis is based on guesses. So how can project practitioners stop the guessing game and ensure objectivity? Here are seven tips: 1. Consult tools and standards: Qualitative analysis tools are mentioned not only in PMI’s A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) but also in PMI’s Practice Standard for Risk Management. For more risk management reference material, check ISO 31000:2009 and ISO 17666:2003. 2. Define qualitative scales in the risk management plan: The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission’s Risk Assessment in Practice has created some good examples of what impact and probability scales could look like. (See pages 4 and 5). You may also want to check the Project Risk Management Handbook: A Scalable Approach (page 20). 3. Gather and document information about identified risks: Interview and involve relevant stakeholders, review lessons learned, document assumptions and information for each risk. 4. Adopt expert opinion, whenever possible: Get a second opinion from more experienced project managers, project management office leaders and other internal experts. If you are not familiar enough with risk identification and analysis for a particular project, hire external experts or consultants. 5. Consider using a risk breakdown structure: Grouping risks in categories helps in identifying root causes and in developing effective responses. 6. Assess probability, impact and urgency for individual risks: Investigate the likelihood of occurrence for each specific risk and its potential effect on project objectives (scope, schedule, cost), documenting the results according to the predefined qualitative scale levels. 7. Prioritize risks using the probability and impact matrix: Rate risks and develop your final probability and impact matrix to determine the need for further quantitative analysis and to plan for risk responses. Adopting a well-defined qualitative scale and carefully assessing risk data and information will help your team perform better risk analyses. Do you agree with that? Please share your comments and experience. |
3 Steps to Outsourcing Success
Categories:
ROI,
Project Failure,
Risk Management,
PM & the Economy,
Nontraditional Project Management,
Best Practices,
Project Planning,
Project Delivery,
Project Requirements,
Roundtable,
Strategy,
Stakeholder Management,
Innovation,
Change Management,
Leadership,
Lessons Learned,
Program Management,
Benefits Realization,
Complexity,
Teams
Categories: ROI, Project Failure, Risk Management, PM & the Economy, Nontraditional Project Management, Best Practices, Project Planning, Project Delivery, Project Requirements, Roundtable, Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Innovation, Change Management, Leadership, Lessons Learned, Program Management, Benefits Realization, Complexity, Teams
|
By Peter Tarhanidis When leaders use outsourcing it is often in an effort to enhance the organization’s value proposition to its stakeholders. Outsourcing allows leaders to focus on and invest in the firm’s core services while using cost effective alternative sources of expertise for support services. When services are outsourced, management and employees need to prepare for a transformation in organizational operations—and project managers must establish a strategy to guide that change.
Creating an Outsourcing Strategy Project managers can help to create an effective outsourcing strategy based on a three-part structure: 1. Assess the current state This assessment should define the firm’s:
2. Consider the “to-be” state The to-be state should be designed based on a comprehensive evaluation and request for proposal, including a good list of best alternatives to negotiated agreement items. The to-be state must consider:
3. Consider the governance required to sustain the future state A new internal operating model needs to be formed. This includes establishing teams to manage the contract, such as senior sponsorship, an operational management team or a vendor management team. Then the outsourcer and the outsourcing organization should focus on continuous improvements that can be made to the process.
Avoiding Outsourcing Pitfalls Project managers can avoid a few common pitfalls in their outsourcing projects:
Overall, if done with a defined end in mind, leaders can capitalize on outsourcing by reducing operational costs, reinvesting those savings in core services, and providing access to expertise and IT systems that would normally not have been funded via capital appropriation. Have you been a part of any outsourcing efforts? What advice would you offer to project managers involved in similar projects? |
Will IoT Disrupt the Mobile Industry?
|
by Wanda Curlee The Internet of Things (IoT) will change the cell phone landscape. For many years, the smartphone has been our link to apps. We could lock our cars, play games, spy on our pets—the list is almost exhaustive. But, I am constantly brought back to a question of whether or not smartphones will always be necessary—or will they become obsolete as more IoT devices are created that combine the hardware, software and user interface into one place. Is this pie in the sky? Based on how our technology is rapidly progressing (which I started discussing in my last post), I don’t think so. As Maurice McGinley, design director for Amsterdam-based AVG Innovation Labs said, “Instead of having one universal device—your smartphone—controlling your environment, you would have simple controls placed where you need them, available when you need them.” While I have no insight into the strategic direction of the companies developing smart devices, I would contend this is the direction they will be going. And this is great for the project management discipline. Smartphone manufacturers and network providers (Verizon, AT&T, etc.) will need to change or broaden focus, and that means investing in new projects and programs. And the portfolio manager will need to ensure the projects and programs are on the roadmap to deliver the right value for the enterprise. Smart device manufacturers will need to figure out how to provide a friendly user interface similar to the mobile experience. The project management discipline would be used in a similar way as the cell phone industry. The portfolio manager should scan the enterprise for projects and programs that meet the need. If there are none or not enough to help drive the strategy, the portfolio manager needs to work with the portfolio sponsor to determine the issues. The project and program managers would deliver the capabilities needed. So, where will you be when the industry is stood on its head? How will you help to focus the IoT to deliver the right technology for consumers and companies? Project practitioners that truly understand their industry and where it is going can be drivers of that change. |
What Is Strategy?
Categories:
Portfolio Management,
Strategy,
Change Management,
Leadership,
PMO,
Communications Management
Categories: Portfolio Management, Strategy, Change Management, Leadership, PMO, Communications Management
|
By Jen L. Skrabak, PMP, PfMP Most portfolio managers are aware of the importance of aligning their portfolio to the strategy of the organization. But what exactly is strategy? Strategy is commonly misunderstood. Sometimes it is used to denote importance or criticality, for example, a “strategic program.” Other times, it may be used to convey an action plan—an organization may say that their strategy is to launch a new key product. In reality, however, strategy does not denote importance or complexity; rather, it represents the collective decisions that enable the organization to amplify its uniqueness in order to win. It’s important to think of strategy as having three components: Definition: The intent of the organization over the long term. Plan: Clear, concise and compelling actions expressed through a strategic plan and roadmap. Visualization helps to articulate the strategy, and align it with objectives and measurements. Frameworks and tools such as a strategy map, balanced scorecard and activity map help plan the strategy. Execution: How the organization will achieve its defined plan through its portfolios (and corresponding programs and projects). The portfolio represents the decisions that the organization has made in order to execute on the strategy. What Strategy IS and IS NOT
The strategy should define for the organization and individuals: -Where are we going? -Why are we going there? -What’s my role? In my next post, we’ll discuss how to align portfolio management to strategy. |







In my last 

