Project Management

A Project Culture of Mass Hallucination?

From the People and Projects Blog
by
The source of your greatest joys as a project manager will be the same as your biggest challenges: people. This is a blog for discussing issues related to leading teams and delivering projects.

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

The Increasing Influence of Women in Project Management

How To Connect With People In a World of Virtual Meetings

An Experiment That Can Significantly Improve Your Performance

A Practical Way to Build Relationships (Even When You’re Short on Time)

You Are Hurting Your Career (and Project) If You're Not Doing This

Categories

accountability, bias, career, conflict, constraints, culture, decision-making, Estimating, excellence, feedback, influence, Leadership, learning, Lessons Learned, meeting management, negotiation, networking, personal performance, priority management, project management, project planning, project sponsorship, stakeholder management, time management

Date

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  


“You can hit this date, right?”

It’s Maria, one of your stakeholders from the other side of the business. She’s asking for a commitment to deliver a project by a specific date. You know the date is ambitious but the way she’s asking makes it clear that she’s only going to accept a Yes.

You pause.

“Sure!” is the word that slips out of your mouth. But if she could read your mind, she wouldn’t be walking away so confidently, leaving you once again with that sick feeling of “How in the world are we going to do this?”

After a day of ruminating about the project, you realize that you need something from her in order to deliver on the promised date. Your eyes brighten! She probably won’t be able to deliver on her part so that will give you some wiggle room! Brilliant!

You call her. “Hi Maria. You know that project we talked about yesterday? Well, in order to hit that date, this is what I need from you.” You elaborate on the needs.

It’s time to go for the ask. “I’ll need all this by the end of next week. Can you get that to me on time?” You pause, praying for a No.

Maria pauses. “Um. Well, let’s see. Yes, I can. Sure!”

Sigh.

Promises, Promises

Can you relate to the discussion with Maria? Perhaps you spend a lot of time in Maria’s role, receiving promises from people who you know won’t deliver. Or maybe you work with people like Maria, who press you with deadlines but don’t supply you with the information you need to deliver.

It’s important to note that you’re not alone. This drama plays out in organizations around the world, across industries. In a conversation with a high-level executive at a biotech firm, the discussion turned to how promises get made to investors and senior executives. He told me, “We make these date commitments but everyone knows we won’t hit them.”

I replied, “Kind of like mass hallucination, eh?” He smiled, but not with this eyes.

Project Culture

It is critical that you and your organization develop a culture that delivers. Relying on crossed fingers, hope, good intentions, and heroics doesn’t scale. The fundamentals of delivery need to be ingrained in the culture.

It’s rather fashionable these days to talk about organizational culture. Let me be clear: your organization has a culture of project management. It’s just a matter of whether or not that culture is helping or hindering your ability to deliver.

Yoda on Corporate Culture

Dr. Edgar Schein is the Society of Sloan Fellows Professor of Management Emeritus and a Professor Emeritus at the MIT Sloan School of Management. He’s widely credited with coining the term organizational culture. When I set up the interview to talk with Dr. Schein, I didn’t realize what a superstar the guy really was.

It didn’t take long in the interview for me to feel like I was talking with Yoda! He responded with ease to my questions about culture.

What is culture, according to Dr. Schein? In short, it’s what has worked. It’s the sum total of what a group has learned that works in solving problems. Whether you like it or not, the project culture in your organization exists because it has sufficiently worked in the past.

Dr. Schein suggests that culture can be broken down into three levels: artifacts, espoused values, and tacit assumptions.

What You Can See

If you walk through an organization, you can see the architecture of the building, the layout of the workspaces, the type of technology they provide for their employees, and the signs on the walls. These are artifacts—things that can be seen. For projects, you might see methodology binders, organization charts, process diagrams, and computer systems to manage project data. You could follow a project manager around and see their behavior—the actions they take. All of these help define the culture.

What We Say

As you continue walking through an organization, you might want to know why certain things are done. You see that a standard operating procedure is documented (the artifact), but you’re wondering why it’s done that way. These would be examples of espoused values—the stated beliefs that give a sense of what is truly valued in the organization?

For example, let’s say you find a form that seems like an unnecessary step in a process. You might ask, “Why do your project managers have to fill out this form?” Perhaps a response would be, “Because we’ve found that the extra step helps make sure we don’t start projects without a business rationale. A couple years back we found that we were wasting too much money on different executives’ pet projects.”

What We Assume

Yet beyond what we see and what is said, there are underlying assumptions that drive what and how things get done in an organization. They are not even stated—just assumed—as if they are obviously a fact or a matter of truth.

All these factors are like an iceberg. Above the water we can see the artifacts and discuss beliefs and values. But below the water we have the underlying assumptions. As with icebergs, these remain unseen and yet can be deadly if not taken into account.

Let’s say your executive team regularly sends e-mails late into the evening. It might be assumed by others that such activity is expected from everyone. There’s not a policy in writing (artifact) that directs people to do so. If you asked someone in HR whether employees are required to be on e-mail until midnight, they could not point to such direction in an Employee Handbook. Yet there’s this underlying assumption of the expectation, which leads to overflowing inboxes and red, baggy eyes amongst a workforce assuming that sleep is not a priority.

In a previous post I wrote about the written and unwritten rules. When considering culture, think of Dr. Schein’s artifacts and espoused values as the written rules—those things above the water. The underlying assumptions are the unwritten rules, those drivers that we cannot see under the water that drive everything above it.

In our next post, we’ll talk about how to make some progress in changing your project culture. But for now, here’s my challenge for you: take some time to consider your current project culture. What is above the water, so to speak, when it comes to projects? What are the written rules? The artifacts? The stated reasons for why things are done?

When we talk about this in our workshops and keynotes, people often reply with things like tools (e.g. Microsoft Project, AsanaXMind, etc.), their Project Management Office (PMO), templates, processes, executive level support, stated expectations, etc. How would you resond?

In addition, what are those factors under the water, so to speak: the underlying assumptions? What are the unwritten rules at your organization regarding how projects should be managed? See how many you can identify. I invite you to share your observations and questions in the comments below.

You can’t sustain a culture of mass hallucination. Hope is a wonderful thing for humanity but’s a lousy strategy for delivering projects. Let’s start with diagnosing your current culture. Next time we’ll talk about how to change that conversation with Maria.

If this post was helpful, I invite you to share it with your connections and LinkedIn groups.

Listen to the interview with Dr. Edgar Schein athttp://www.PeopleAndProjectsPodcast.com/25.


Posted on: March 04, 2015 05:35 PM | Permalink

Comments (31)

Page: 1 2 next>

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
avatar
Navdeep Joshi Sr. Consltant - CA PPM| TBD Bangalore, Karnataka, India
From the example of "Maria", that you geve, what you're saying is right ! People, in general don't have a habit of saying "NO". In the world of project management "communication" is the key. You need to say the right things at the right time, and know how they should be conveyed. You need to come out of the EQs (emotional quotient) and face the reality. If you have your facts right, why not convey them ? In the longer run, it does help. A realistic picture portrayed is far better than a sorry picture that you might have to picture later on .... :)

avatar
Andy Kaufman Host| People and Projects Podcast Lake Zurich, Il, United States
Thanks for sharing your perspective Navdeep!

avatar
Michael Adams Solutions Architect| LANL Los Alamos, Nm, United States
Andy, I read this a few days ago, and almost couldn't cope. I have relatively little influence in my organization, and no decision making ability.

That being said, I have some observations, particularly about assumptions:

1) Artifacts: Our organization is split into functional groups - Under the Water: Each group looks out for its self, but there is insufficient focus on what would make the enterprise "high performing." Some groups are pursuing Baldrige certification, but NOT the whole enterprise, despite direction from the directors to be an HPO.

2) Overwhelming evidence suggests that senior management works from the assumption that employees in the organization fall under the category of McGregor's Theory X. That labor wants to be directed and managed. That management needs to supervise, that labor isn't motivated to work, nor wants to work. My observation from doing BA work throughout the organization is that this management perception is wrong! That we have the right people to use McGregor's Theory Y, and create a HPO.

3) There is a broad tendency to assign accountability, but reserve authority. People are made accountable for results that they can't produce, because they lack authority, and with that, the ability to make decisions.

Within my group, the IT group, these assumptions don't hold true. Our Dept. head does an excellent job of insulating us from what I consider to a mostly negative and counterproductive culture for project success and collaboration.

Within IT Assumptions are:

1) IT Management won't let you fail. (if someone insists on failing, they can, but if they work hard, and try, management will support them and develop them, so that they succeed.)

2) Everyone is self motivated, and committed to excellence.

3) We have a competent and intelligent staff, one that could be held up against any IT team around the world, and come off as excellent.

I don't know what it would take to impact the enterprise culture, but that is what I'd like to see happen. We could be a world-class organization with the same people we have right now, if we could find the political will to change our culture.

I think, mostly, it is fear of lack of control, which keeps us stuck in the dysfunctional Theory X model, while our employees are yearning for Theory Y. I think management honestly fears that if they give up control, everything will fall apart. I believe that there would be some problems, but that in reality, everything would blossom.

avatar
Andy Kaufman Host| People and Projects Podcast Lake Zurich, Il, United States
Michael, I can see how this must be really frustrating. I had a client years ago who wanted their managers to act more like "owners". The problem: the senior management wasn't willing (beyond words) to extend ownership! I'm not talking about equity ownership--they just were unwilling to empower people lower in the organization to make more decisions on their own.

Ed Schein's point is that the current culture you're dealing with exists for one primary reason: it has sufficiently worked in the past. I don't promise any magic in the follow-up post about changing the culture but hopefully there will be an idea or two that might help.

In the meantime, thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts about culture. I continue to be impressed with how you think through issues. If there's hope at your place for a HPO, it's certainly in part because you're there!

avatar
Tolitha Lewis Sr. Project Manager| Eli Lilly & Company Fishers, In, United States
Totally agree that this culture exists because it has been successful in the past! Having been in an organization where due dates for projects were based upon sufficient review of project scope, it's painful to be recalled to this memory. You offer some very good suggestions. Thank you for your post!

avatar
Andy Kaufman Host| People and Projects Podcast Lake Zurich, Il, United States
Thank you for the feedback on the article, Tolitha! Here's to no mass hallucination for you and your teams today! :)

avatar
Thilo Wack Head of Existing Product and Test Lab| optimed Tholey-Hasborn, Germany
Andy, like most of us I''ve been in that very situation with uncountable "Marias" and have myself been fooled more than once to promise things when I should have known better. The thing is no one promise in itself has been hopeless from the beginning, some were maybe a real stretch, but typically they also were worth it. But having too much of those promises with too little buffer (time and ressource wise) makes them all losers. The culture problem is that although you need a "Can do" attitude for execution, there is only a fine line before this turns against you and too much work-in-process clogs up the system and prevents delivery. Unfortunately lots of Senior Managers still think that efficiency is king and multitasking a sign of highly efficient people / a highly efficient culture. Of course they see that the organization is not delivering, but they just don''t get it, tightening the efficiency screws still more in an attempt to regain control of the situation but only fuelling the vicious circle.

avatar
Andy Kaufman Host| People and Projects Podcast Lake Zurich, Il, United States
"Efficiency is king and multitasking a sign of highly efficient people".... Well said. It's an illusion that permeates too many leaders. Thank you for your insightful response, Thilo.

avatar
Arun Kiran Ponnekanti Delivery Manager| Infosys Technogies Ltd Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
Andy, You rightly touched up on the expectations, which brings up the topic of employee work life balance. Most of the cases the expectations of the management on the team is to be available and it is given that if a mail comes from "Manager", they are expected to act on it immediately irrespective of the time it came in. In this whole scenario, employee work life balance is not of any priority.

The interesting fact is that most of the employees are not bold enough to say "No" to take up additional load beyond a limit. The first example you gave, there is a case of saying No on both the sides, but both said Yes.

avatar
Rachit Khanna Chief Engineer| Dastur Kolkata, West Bengal, India
You offer good suggestions. Thank you ! Yes we do not like No for an answer, even if it means unrealistic targets. Project Completion dates cannot be based on senior management's whims and fancies.

avatar
Salam Kalandos Chief, Healthcare Technology Management - Clinical Engineering | US Department of Veterans Affairs Chandler, Az, United States
Great suggestions, thank you for sharing

avatar
anil kukreti Senior engineer | Mobiquity softech pvt ltd Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
Organization Culture is built on past success formulas and somewhere these success formulas are hindering the further growth of organization and after reading this wonderful article i have started understanding the meaning "what get you here .. can't get you there'.

Thanks

avatar
farinaz fallah chamasemani Isfahan, Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Great suggestions, thank you for sharing

avatar
Paul Pelletier Project management key note speaker, author, corporate lawyer, and executive| Paul Pelletier Consulting Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Great and very truthful article. The pressure for results and the seemingly non-stop demands from our organizations, stakeholders and clients to produce results within timelines that aren't always advisable or reasonable has other unexpected consequences.
For example, I do a lot of work in the area of workplace respect in PM. Unfortunately, the results-orientation of many organizations leaves them open to the creation of a culture that condones or fosters stressed-out, uni-focused leaders and project managers who care less about their staff and only about the results. This can lead to a culture where workplace bullies succeed because they are adept at getting those results.
However, an often ignored but critical point is that those short-term results come with much larger long-term negative impacts. The organizational and project impacts of workplace disrespect are well documented and included serious financial, human resource, legal, reputational, operational and talent costs that far-outweigh the positives of the short-term results.
The lesson - "No" may be the best answer for everyone. Easy to say but not always easy to do.

avatar
Andy Kaufman Host| People and Projects Podcast Lake Zurich, Il, United States
Thanks for the feedback, Paul. Your comments about short-term results orientation are well stated.

I teach an MBA project management class in Chicago--it's part of a Healthcare MBA program. A student (doctor from Egypt) recently said, "In my opinion, to meet the user expectation is more important than to deliver the project on time and to maintain the budget limit. The project success has no meaning if it is not going to satisfy the customer whom we do the project for. We as a provider have to see the project with the eyes of the consumer, not with the eyes of the experts."

Though many executives might not completely agree about her date/budget point, I was so pleased that she is understanding that it's not ALL about the date and budget.

Thanks again for sharing your comments, Paul!

avatar
Manas De Amin Director| Computer Technology Group Kolkata Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Thanks Andy for such a good article. A few days ago I read an article by Paul Pelletier on Bullying at work place. I believe, the problems discussed by both of you come from the same source. It''s a lack of Organisation Development practice. The unwritten can exist only if the organisation is not business minded.
I have worked in HPO. When Blackberries were given to managers, it was expected that, they will communicate at once. And the organisation in question, spans more than seventy countries. Just imagine the situation.
In an article written by a HR Manager of a famous MNC, I found him talking 80 hours of work a week which is expected from all.
Good and wise people as well as engaged, at top management can change this I hope.

avatar
Abdullah Alhasabeen Area Manager| Saudi Readymix Concrete Co. Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
they master key is the commitment , the communication , and the culture.

avatar
Andy Kaufman Host| People and Projects Podcast Lake Zurich, Il, United States
That's a great summary, Abdullah. Thank you for taking the time to share it!

avatar
John Herman . Us, Aa, United States
It''s true that a corporate culture of "Can Do" positive optimism can result in bad estimates and results. I've been in such companies and wow, I really admire the hope and enthusiasm. And being a "realist" can sometimes make one appear to be "counter-culture". I would advise "realists" in such a culture to be very clear about the support for their reasoning that the project will take longer, cost more, or achieve less than the planned performance. A very tough situation, but if you can gain the respect of your peers and superiors, they will accept your "pessimistic reality". It doesn't hurt to be right a few times as well, but one certainly should not be boastful. "I told you so" does not go over well when the project is struggling - that''s NOT being a team player. Your colleagues will eventually recognize your point of view.

avatar
Andy Kaufman Host| People and Projects Podcast Lake Zurich, Il, United States
Thanks for adding to the discussion, John! One of my favorite articles on how this optimism vs pessimism shows up in projects is from the MIT Sloan Management Review: http://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-pitfalls-of-project-status-reporting/

It's worth reading, especially if someone is in a sponsor role.

Page: 1 2 next>

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS

"Managing senior programmers is like herding cats."

- D. Platt

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors