Project planning should start with the 5 W questions before getting to the How?
From the Easy in theory, difficult in practice Blog
by Kiron Bondale
My musings on project management, project portfolio management and change management.
I'm a firm believer that a pragmatic approach to organizational change that addresses process & technology, but primarily, people will maximize chances for success.
This blog contains articles which I've previously written and published as well as new content.
Recent Posts
Leading Through Crisis Means Leading Through Context
"It's the end. But the moment has been prepared for." - retirement lessons from the Doctor
Just because they are non-critical, doesn't mean they are not risky!
Just because they are non-critical, doesn't mean they are not risky!
How will YOU avoid these AI-related cognitive biases?
Categories
Agile,
Artificial Intelligence,
Career Development,
Change Management,
Communications Management,
Decision Making,
Governance,
Hiring,
Kanban,
Lessons Learned,
Personal Development,
PMO,
Portfolio Management,
Project Management,
Resource Management,
Risk Management,
Risk Management,
Schedule Management,
Scheduling,
Tools
Date
With all of the tools, techniques and processes within our profession, we sometimes lose sight of the basic principles of project management. One way to ensure that you are not over-complicating things is to assess your approach from the perspective of a small child.
On project planning, understanding & communicating the five W’s can provide context and perspective for the low-level details found within the individual project plans.
What – at its very essence, scope definition is about answering the “What do we want to do?” question. It’s amazing how many projects will consume significant resources (and churn as a result) without having a simple answer.
Why (and Why, Why, Why, and Why?) – if there’s one thing we lose as we grow up, it’s the admirable (?!?) persistence that a small child demonstrates when trying to learn about something new. We might ask the “Why are we doing this project?” question once or twice, but how often do we probe really deep to understand the fundamental root benefits & motivations that are driving its existence? We should adopt the traditional performance improvement technique which recommends asking “Why?” five times to ensure that we are not presenting a surface-level driver as the main reason for investing in a project.
Who – Although the What might not have been sufficiently decomposed to identify all of the skills or competencies required, there should be some idea of the critical roles that are required to deliver the What.
When – When is the latest that the What must be delivered to enable the organization to achieve the Why?
Where – where is the optimal location for the work to be performed and where will the What be used?
The project manager’s focus can now shift to the question that too often gets all the attention before there’s a good understanding of the five W’s: How?
This ensures that we don’t spend too much time on approach, methodologies and practices, without having first understood the project’s essence.
(Note: this article was originally written and published by me in May 2012 on https://kbondale.wordpress.com)
Posted on: January 15, 2018 11:12 AM |
Permalink
Comments (13)
Please login or join to subscribe to this item
Excellent, thanks for sharing
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates
New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Good Post Kirson - I'd add Which to the W's.
Thanks Eduin!
Rami - give me an example of a type of Which that would apply?
Kiron
The "Which" Rami mentioned might be which tools and non-human resources we need. Which is similar to What, but it highlights more what we don't choose as opposed to what we do choose: Which one/s.
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates
New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Sante, you beat me to it. This is exactly what I meant. Cheers !
Apart from finding reasons on investing in project. Five why's can also be used to solve problems, trouble shooting and even improvement in quality too.
Thank you Kiron for a great read.
Anish Abraham
Privacy Program Manager| University of Washington
Auburn, Wa, United States
Informative article and thanks for sharing, Kiron
Samer Alhmdan
Senior Project Manager, PMP, PMI-RMP, LEED AP, EDGE Expert| dar
Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Thank you for the valued information!
The "W"s are a fundamental we all get away from and need to remember. Great repost.
Drew Craig
Sr. Agile & Product Coach| Vanguard
Philadelphia, Pa, United States
Valuable information. Thanks for the share.
Excellent article Kiron. I will add those 5 W's to my PM toolbox.
Thanks everyone for your kind feedback!
Kiron
Jaeho Cho
Director of PM/PMO. Look for opportunities| self-employeed
Seoul, South Korea
Especially, reiterate question through why ie., 5-why could make things clear what, where, who, when. Once we realize the problem by knowing what, where, when, who, then the only thing what we have to think about is how. Any plan looks good prepared without knowing the real problem, object , then it shall not be effective planning for success at all.
Please Login/Register to leave a comment.
|
"It is one of the blessings of old friends that you can afford to be stupid with them."
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
|