Project Management

Q&A with Ken Schwaber

From the Scrumptious Blog
by
Scrum is the most popular framework used within an agile environment to convert complex problems into valuable products and services. In this blog, we will examine all things Scrum to shed light on this wonderful organizational tool that is sweeping the globe. There will be engaging articles, interviews with experts and Q&A's. Are you ready to take the red pill? Then please join me on a fascinating journey down the rabbit hole, and into the world of Scrum.

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

The Agile Engine

Scrum at School

Why SAFe may not be safe

Scrum on Mars

Scrum vs Kanban

Categories

Agile, Agile Certified Practitioner, Agile Release Train, Agile Transformation, Burndown Chart, Burnup Chart, business transformation, Chief Project Officer, Development Team, Distributed Teams, Earned Value Management, Flexible Workforce, Information Radiators, Leadership, Lessons Learned, Mars, middle management, New Ways of Working, PMI-ACP, Product Owner, Product Roadmap, Release Train Engineer, Remote Teams, resisting change, RTE, SAFe, Scope Creep, Scrum, Scrum Certification, Scrum in Academia, Scrum in School, Scrum Master, Scrum Team, Scrum Training, Scrumian, Stakeholder Management, Story Map, War Room

Date

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  


With Scrum being by far the most influential and pervasive framework for delivering Agile projects, I thought it might be interesting to find out why Scrum has been so successful, any challenges it may face when scaling, and how it might evolve in the future.

To investigate these topics further, who better to ask than the co-founder of Scrum itself. Ken Schwaber, who also founded and chairs Scrum.org, graciously accepted my request to answer the following questions.

1. When you first created the Scrum framework, did you believe it could become as widespread as it has?

No, I didn’t. I knew it worked for me at the organizations and on the projects where I used it. I knew waterfall was draining the life out of software development and angering our customers, so I thought I would share it with others. But, as life is very complex, who can ever predict outcomes (empiricism of Scrum).

2. Why do you believe Scrum is the most popular framework for delivering Agile projects?

It is very simple. Every person adds their interpretations, so they can use it in their context and it becomes pretty universally applicable. It is just really, really hard to use; Scrum makes transparent facts that are contrary to human nature’s desire for good things to happen. Scrum sometimes makes really unpleasant things visible. The choice is to figure out what to do to solve the problems, or to “modify” Scrum so the unpleasantness is again hidden.

3. What do you see as the major challenges to scaling Scrum at the enterprise level?

Enterprise cultures are very different from Scrum’s culture. The Scrum Master has to make Scrum work as well as possible, regardless. For instance, a customer demands that something be done by a certain time. Scrum may disclose that is impossible and trade-offs have to be made. The power structure in a hierarchical organization (only tell me good news) often finds that unacceptable. So the customer is caught between desires and possibility.

4. Should the name Scrum Master be changed to Scrum Coach to adhere more to a servant-leader relationship?

I think that is a bad idea.

5. How can non-development projects benefit from Scrum?

Whenever something changes, that is development. When water acidifies, that is the water developing from one state to another. To understand the greatly needed applicability of Scrum, read Tomas Friedman’s book, “Thank You For Being Late.”  Our world is getting more complex, not less. Scrum is needed more, not less. Scrum is a way of dealing with the significant cultural upheaval that we are going through.

6. Where do you see Scrum 5 years from now?

To deal with greater complexity, we may develop infrastructures that describe how to manage risks and better tolerate R&D. Scrum will be right in the middle as meaningful possibilities emerge.

                                                               * * *

I wish to thank Ken Schwaber for his great insights, and Lindsay Velecina at Scrum.org for her assistance during the Q&A process. The world is a little wiser about Scrum as a result.
 


Thank you for your interest in the Scrumptious blog. If you have any ideas for Scrum topics, please message me here. Until next time, remember, projects can be Scrumptious!
Sante Vergini Signature

 


Posted on: February 26, 2018 04:42 PM | Permalink

Comments (28)

Page: 1 2 <prev

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
avatar
Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD Senior Project Manager| Infosys Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
That's interesting Andrew. Thanks for that update.

avatar
Drew Craig Sr. Agile & Product Coach| Vanguard Philadelphia, Pa, United States
I am mainly in IT, so my view is slightly skewed. That said, it is interesting the assumptions and bias to IT. SAFe is significantly based on Lean's core principles, which are not IT centric.

SAFe attempts to incorporate the various lessons from Lean and Agile into the basic principles, which are then used to bring substantial improvements to time to market, employee engagement, quality, and productivity.

Also, came across this short piece with some additional references:
https://blog.versionone.com/agile-construction-management/

avatar
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Thanks Andrew, much appreciated. Cheers

avatar
Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD Senior Project Manager| Infosys Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Rami, did you look over that article from Andrews post? If so, what did you think?

avatar
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Of course I did. It is a very interesting approach and point of view especially translating the Agile Activities / Terms into Construction Terms. Although I might not agree with all translations such as the Retrospective but for the most part it makes sense.

On another note, comparing a User Story to a Work Package might not be very realistic in reality as a Work Package in a construction project might have a lot of activities so sometimes a user story can be an activity and the Done Increment is the work package.

Also I did not see a clear mention to a product backlog with can be compared to the WBS I believe.

avatar
Sante Delle-Vergini, PhD Senior Project Manager| Infosys Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Rami, hmm. It seems as though there may be a lot of room for clarification and growth for Scrum in this industry. But that's good right?

avatar
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Yes there is BUT on a Scaled Level for sure. Nexus is a great framework but of course to apply in construction, it requires lots and lots of deep thinking and planning.

avatar
RAJESH K L Project Manager, PMP| Bharat Electronics, Bengaluru, India Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Thanks for sharing

Page: 1 2 <prev

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS

"If this isn't a Strad, I'm out 50 bucks."

- Jack Benny

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors