Project Management

Just because you have information radiators doesn't mean senior stakeholders will review them!

From the Easy in theory, difficult in practice Blog
by
My musings on project management, project portfolio management and change management. I'm a firm believer that a pragmatic approach to organizational change that addresses process & technology, but primarily, people will maximize chances for success. This blog contains articles which I've previously written and published as well as new content.

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

Leading Through Crisis Means Leading Through Context

"It's the end. But the moment has been prepared for." - retirement lessons from the Doctor

Just because they are non-critical, doesn't mean they are not risky!

Just because they are non-critical, doesn't mean they are not risky!

How will YOU avoid these AI-related cognitive biases?

Categories

Agile, Artificial Intelligence, Career Development, Change Management, Communications Management, Decision Making, Governance, Hiring, Kanban, Lessons Learned, Personal Development, PMO, Portfolio Management, Project Management, Resource Management, Risk Management, Risk Management, Schedule Management, Scheduling, Tools

Date

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  

Categories: Agile, Change Management


Information radiators are a great idea.

After all, who wouldn't want to reduce the effort involved in keeping stakeholders up-to-date about a product or project or increase the consistency in messaging to all stakeholders?

But convincing executives to use information radiators as a primary means of staying current is not an easy task. Yes, there might be a few early adopters who are open to trying a different way  but most are likely to prefer to receive these updates the way they've always got them through one-on-one or steering committee meetings using status reports. So project managers or Product Owners spend time harvesting and curating information from the radiators into traditional status reports or presentation decks.

This introduces a few challenges:

  • The activity of creating these reports or presentation decks is non-value add
  • The information shared is likely to be somewhat stale
  • There is an increased likelihood of reduced transparency as the "warts & all" information available in radiators might have been redacted or modified to fit the spin which the publisher wished to portray

So how can we help executives through the transition to using information radiators?

Start with why - if they don't understand how traditional reporting approaches hurt them, they are unlikely to have any sense of urgency about adopting a different approach. Whether it is reducing delivery costs or improving the quality of information presented, find out what concerns them and use that as a lever for change.

Second, you will want to ensure that the information radiators being published are relevant to senior stakeholders. Taking the time to understand what they need to support their decision making should help in creating dashboards which they will actually want to use.

Finally, rather than asking them to make the significant leap from a meeting-based approach to a self-service model, consider continuing the meetings, but use information radiators as the supporting materials for the discussions in place of traditional presentation decks. This should spark your stakeholders' curiosity as they are likely to ask questions based on their interpretation of the information published which will provide you with an opportunity to provide live "color commentary" about the project or product's status.

If you want management to change, you need to apply effective change management.


Posted on: May 12, 2019 07:00 AM | Permalink

Comments (9)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
avatar
Drew Craig Sr. Agile & Product Coach| Vanguard Philadelphia, Pa, United States
That is the unfortunate truth. But that doesn't mean we should have them at our ready! As often as possible, even if screen grabbing some of the information for a presentation or email, always provide a direct link to the data source, i.e., dashboard. Just make sure all have access to view. Only thing worse than bad or old data, is the inability for leadership to view/access a provided link :)

Thanks, Kiron.

avatar
Kiron Bondale Retired | Mentor| Retired Welland, Ontario, Canada
Thanks Andrew!

avatar
SHADAV MOHAMMAD ANSARI PMO| ITC INFOTECH INDIA PVT. Ltd. New Delhi, Delhi, India
Yes. We can not avoid this .We need effective change management for changing the management.
Thanks for sharing it.

avatar
Ronan O Rourke Retired Executive Manager, Water & Drainage Operations| Retired Bray, Ireland
Thanks for this article. I can certainly see the advantage of having a one stop shop for 'warts and all' reporting on a project that is 'transparent' and accessible to all stakeholders. It would save having to prepare bespoke updates for different stakeholders and this is a practice I am currently waste a lot of time doing. Thanks again

avatar
Kiron Bondale Retired | Mentor| Retired Welland, Ontario, Canada
Thanks Shadav & Ronan!

avatar
Alok Priyadarshi Project Manager| Tata Consulting Engineers Limited Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India
Great suggestions. Thanks for sharing!!

avatar
Kiron Bondale Retired | Mentor| Retired Welland, Ontario, Canada
Thanks Alok!

avatar
Julie Ann Jones Lincs, Lincolnshire, United Kingdom
A great post Kiron, I agree they are great for promoting team responsibility and tend to provoke conversation, thanks for sharing

avatar
Sean Whitaker Project Management Consultant| Crystal Consulting Christchurch, New Zealand
Loved your last sentence about management change

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS

"I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception."

- Groucho Marx

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors