Project Management

“Organize Around Products/Services” is a great addition to the Disciplined Agile principles!

From the Easy in theory, difficult in practice Blog
by
My musings on project management, project portfolio management and change management. I'm a firm believer that a pragmatic approach to organizational change that addresses process & technology, but primarily, people will maximize chances for success. This blog contains articles which I've previously written and published as well as new content.

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

Leading Through Crisis Means Leading Through Context

"It's the end. But the moment has been prepared for." - retirement lessons from the Doctor

Just because they are non-critical, doesn't mean they are not risky!

Just because they are non-critical, doesn't mean they are not risky!

How will YOU avoid these AI-related cognitive biases?

Categories

Agile, Artificial Intelligence, Career Development, Change Management, Communications Management, Decision Making, Governance, Hiring, Kanban, Lessons Learned, Personal Development, PMO, Portfolio Management, Project Management, Resource Management, Risk Management, Risk Management, Schedule Management, Scheduling, Tools

Date

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  

Categories: Agile, Project Management


The original seven Disciplined Agile (DA) principles were recently refactored and as part of this refactoring, a principle was added: "Organize Around Products/Services".

While it is just one of the eight principles, this new one aligns very well with lean thinking. It also addresses many challenges which leadership teams experience with agile transformations. Such transformations require change to happen in not only the delivery teams within an enterprise, but also supporting functions such as finance, human resources, operations and procurement.

Some benefits of a product or service-centric organization include:

  • A reduced likelihood of the "throw it over the wall" syndrome. When delivery teams are responsible for not just the enhancements to their products or services but also the resolution of escaped defects there is more skin in the game for them to build higher quality solutions. This also encourages teams to take a holistic view of a solution and not just its usability and functionality.
  • Securing funding is less challenging when we organize around solutions rather than the individual projects to evolve those solutions. Based on the strategic value of the product or service, governance leaders should be able to allocate a tranche of funding for a time period such as a quarter or a fiscal year. That funding will determine how much value can be added into the solution over that time period.
  • Better team cohesion and a reduction in the waste that comes with repeatedly going through the Forming-Storming-Norming (and Adjourning) phases of team development. When we organize around solutions, the delivery team remains together until that product or service is no longer needed by the organization. Prerequisites for high performing teams such as psychological safety and radical candor are more likely to develop and be strengthened within long-standing teams rather than short-lived ones. The team would also gain greater knowledge of the business domain which would increase the value they can provide to stakeholders while they are enhancing their assigned products or services.
  • It addresses the inherent problem that how we structure an organization is not how the work on products or services is actually accomplished.

This is not to say that organizations don't need project management as the hard and soft tools of the profession are still critical to implementing successful change. There will always be some changes which are "one and done" and those will remain fair game for project teams. Nothing would prevent product/service owners from organizing the allocation of funds within their annual allotment to projects if that makes the management of this funding easier for them.

But if we are looking to increase alignment, organizing around products or services is a good way to cut through the silo thinking which develops when we are organized by function or capability.


Posted on: June 07, 2020 08:32 AM | Permalink

Comments (5)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
avatar
FARHAN BIN ZOBAIR Aligarh, Up, India
Interesting articles

avatar
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Good piece Kiron, I never heard of the "Throw it over the wall" syndrome so I learned something new. Cheers !

avatar
Kiron Bondale Retired | Mentor| Retired Welland, Ontario, Canada
Thanks Rami - yeah, I might be dating myself with that phrase, but it was commonly used in tech shops to refer to the unfortunate habit of devs building something which barely worked and tossing it over to operations teams who had to make it work properly.

Kiron

avatar
Eduin Fernando Valdes Alvarado Project Manager| F y F Fabricamos Futuro Villavicencio, Meta, Colombia
Very interesting article., thanks for sharing

avatar
Michael Hilbert Director of Project Management| TuWay Communications Bethlehem, Pa, United States
Thanks for the insights Kiron... DA is a topic I am trying to get a better understanding of right now. I am not Agile trained, could you suggest some readings on DA that would give me the basic tools and concepts?

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS

"[Musicians] talk of nothing but money and jobs. Give me businessmen every time. They really are interested in music and art."

- Jean Sibelius, explaining why he rarely invited musicians to his home.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors