Personal Kanban - What Makes You Happy
From the Drunken PM Blog
by Dave Prior
Drunken Boxing for Project Managers
“The main feature of the drunkard boxing is to hide combative hits in drunkard-like, unsteady movements and actions so as to confuse the opponent. The secret of this style of boxing is maintaining a clear mind while giving a drunken appearance.”
Yeah... just like that… but with network diagrams and burndown charts… and a wee bit less vodka.
Recent Posts
Certified Agile Leadership Training with Olaf
Don Kim - I Think, Therefore I Plan
Agile Coach to Agile Gamer - Peter Saddington
Scrum in School - A Case Study of Grandview Prep's Transformation
Forecasting Tools Based on Team Performance with Troy Magennis
Categories
20 Hour,
211,
4-Hour Body,
4-Hour Chef,
4-Hour Work Week,
Aakash Srinivasan,
Aaron Smith,
Adam Weisbart,
Adrian Howard,
Agile,
agile digitalpm,
Agile 2010,
agile 2015,
Agile Alliance,
Agile Classroom,
Agile Enterprise,
Agile Mindset,
agile reporting,
agile transformation,
Agile Tribes,
agile2015,
AgileClassroom,
AgileCraft,
AgileScout,
AgileThinking,
Ainsley Nies,
Al Goernor,
Al Shalloway,
Alistair Cockburn,
Angela Harms,
Anna Beatrice Scott,
Ansley Nies,
AOW4PM,
apocalypse now,
apple,
art of war,
Bas De Baar,
Bas Vodde,
Beyond Legacy Code,
Big Visible,
BigVIsible,
bimodal,
Blackie,
Bob Sarni,
body language,
book review,
braintrust,
branding,
breaking gantt,
Brent Beer,
Brett Pohlman,
Brian Bozzuto,
brian flatow,
brian rabon,
business agility,
Business Model Canvas,
CAL,
Canvas,
capacity,
carson pierce,
Catherine Louis,
Center for Non-Violent Communication,
Certification,
Certified Agile Leadership,
certified scrum trainer,
Charter,
Chet Hendrickson,
Chris Li,
Chris Spagnuolo,
Christine Neidhardt,
cloud,
cloud worker,
co-working,
Coach's Clinic,
Coaching,
cochlear,
commitment,
conteneo,
Corkulous,
coworking,
Craig Larman,
Crystal,
CSM for PMP,
cst,
DAD,
Dan Brown,
Dan Greening,
dan markovitz,
data,
Dave Prior,
David Anderson,
David Bernstein,
David Bland,
David J Anderson,
Dean Leffingwell,
Dean Stevens,
Declan Whelan,
Denise Jacobs,
Dennis Stevens,
Designing Together Design,
Dhaval Panchal,
diana larsen,
Digital Pm Summit,
Digital Project Management,
digitalpm,
Disciplined Agile Delivery,
Distributed Teams,
Docs to Go,
Don Kim,
dpm,
dpm2013,
drunkenpm,
drunkenpm radio,
eduscrum,
Eight Shapes,
Elizabeth Harrin,
Elizabeth Hendrickson,
Elizabeth McClellan,
EMEA,
emotional intelligence,
Enterprise Scrum,
Essential Scrum,
esther derby,
EVEF,
Evernote,
Every Voice Engaged,
Experience,
Explore It!,
facebook,
field guide,
FIRM REPORT,
First 20 Hours,
Flight Levels,
Flipboard,
FocusedObjective,
forecast,
Forecasting,
Frank Illenberger,
Fred George,
fred kluth,
funny garbage,
Gil Broza,
Github,
Global Economics,
Grandview Prep,
Greg Balestrero,
GTD,
Happy Cog,
Heartline,
Howard Sublett,
hybrid,
I Think Therefore I Plan,
Iain Frasier,
ICAgile,
Idea Wallets,
improvisation,
InfoQ,
InspireMe!,
International Consortium for Agi,
IOS4,
iPad,
iPad 2,
iPad2,
iPhone,
IT&T SIG,
J.B. Rainsberger,
James Tamm,
Jason LIttle,
Jean Tabaka,
Jeff Patton,
Jesse Fewell,
Jessica Kerr,
Jessie Shternshus,
jim benson,
Jim Tamm,
johanna rothman,
John D Cook,
john miller,
Judith Lasater,
Jutta Eckstein,
kamal manglani,
kanban,
kanbanfor1,
kanbanpad,
Kate Sullivan,
Kathy Compton,
Ken Rubin,
Ken Schwaber,
Kenny Rubin,
Keynote,
Kuala Lumpur,
lacey,
Large Scale Scrum,
Larman,
Larry Maccherone,
Larsen,
Lasater,
Leadership Meeting,
LeadingAgile,
lean,
Lean Kanban University,
Lean Systems Engineering,
LeanKit,
Leffingwell,
LESS,
Liftoff,
Linda Rising,
Lithespeed,
Livescribe,
Livescribe Pulse,
LSE,
Luis Garcia,
luke hohmann,
lyssa adkins,
Mac,
MacWorld,
Macworld 2011,
Magennis,
Malaysia,
Malaysia Scrum User Group,
Management,
Managing the Unmanagable,
Manny Gonzalez,
Marc Johnson,
Marshall Rosenberg,
Martin Rosenqvist,
mashup,
matt barcomb,
MDEC,
Merlin,
metrics,
Michael Sahota,
Michele Sliger,
Mickey W. Mantle,
Mike Cohn,
Mike Cottmeyer,
Mike Sutton,
Mike Vizdos,
mitch lacey,
MITPM,
Mode 1,
Mode 2,
modus cooperandi,
Modus Institute,
Nanette Brown,
Natalie Warnert,
Nic Sementa,
NLP,
Non Violent Communication,
Non-violent communication,
Notes Plus,
NVC,
off shore,
Offshore,
Olaf Lewitz,
Open Space,
Oredev,
Øredev,
oredev 2013,
organizational agility,
Organizational Change,
overcommitment,
pag,
Panda Transport,
Panel Picker,
Papershow,
Paul Hammond,
personal agility canvas,
personal branding,
personal kanban,
personal productivity,
personal project management,
personal projectmanagement,
Peter Saddington First15,
Petra Goltz,
Philamade,
pk,
Planning,
PM4Girls,
PMI,
PMI Portugal,
PMP,
podcast,
Product Owner,
Product Ownership,
productivity,
Project,
project management,
project manaqement,
project planning,
Project Potion,
Projects At Work,
projectshrink,
ProjectWizards,
Projet Chartering,
pulse,
rachel howard,
Radical Collaboration,
reach the peak,
Rebecca Wirfs-Brock,
review,
riaan rottier,
Ricardo Vargas,
Robyn Meredith,
Ron Jeffries,
Ron Lichty,
Rosenberg,
SAFE,
Safety,
Sam Barnes,
Sanjiv Augustine,
Scaled Agile Framework,
Schneider and Associates,
School of Rock,
Scott Ambler,
Scrum,
Scrum Alliance,
scrum but,
scrum field guide,
Scrum Gathering,
Scrum in Education,
Scrum in Schools,
scrum in waterfall,
ScrumFest,
Shane Hastie,
Showing Up,
SK Khor,
social media,
SolutionsIQ,
sprint planning,
Steffan Surdek,
stephen denning,
Steve Elliott,
Stewart Copeland,
Story Mapping,
Sun Tzu,
Swarming,
SXSW,
SXSW2012,
Tabaka,
Team Performance,
Teams,
Telecommunications,
Telepresence,
Temenos,
Test Obsessed,
the adstore,
The Ron,
theStrayMuse Louder than Ten,
Thierry Holoweck,
Things,
Thushara,
Tim Ferriss,
Tim Ferriss Experiment,
To Be Agile,
Tobias Mayer,
Tom Kealey,
Tom Mellor,
Tom Perry,
Tom Smallwood,
Tribes,
Tricia Broderick,
troy magennis,
TrustTemenos,
twitter,
Unicat,
User Stories,
value,
VCP,
video conferencing,
Virgin Digital,
Vivek Angiras,
VLC,
vocal technique,
waste,
Weisbart,
What We Say Matters,
Wijewardena,
WIzewerks,
Woody Zuill,
WWDC,
yellowpencil,
Zeldman
Date
Track Your Happiness helped me gain a better understand of my unique issues with determining "value", but, in general, I think happiness is not really my bag... or at least, not the driving force behind my understanding of "value". While working on this project I have been talking with a lot of people who do evaluate things that way. They see the things they have an opportunity to do as either "things which make me happy" or "things which do not make me happy". So, the prioritization happens based on the degree of expected happiness or degree of expected unhappiness.
IMHO think the true goal is to find a way to uncover the aspect of whatever you are doing that can make you happy. It sounds simple, but it requires effort and discipline... it is far easier to just give in and wallow. Personal Kanban is supposed to help you understand your work better, and it has, but my increased awareness of how I perceive the work I have to do may be the most valuable thing I've picked up doing this.
An even though using TrackYourHappiness.org was interesting, it never felt (to me) like it was measuring the right stuff. Happiness seemed close, but not quite close enough.
After some discussion with Boz, I began rating everything I do at 3 different points:
A) How I felt doing it (-3 to +3)
B) How I felt finishing it (-3 to +3)
C) Overall mirth from having it done (-3 to +3)
One of the things I realized in tracking the work I was doing was that for some items, the simple act of finishing it off can be as valuable as getting some newer items done. This is especially true for the ones that have been sitting on the Kanban board smirking at you and taunting you in all their undone glory. The longer they sit the more mental and emotional weight they take on.
It is probably also important to note that how progress is tracked has a toll as well. Capturing a 3 point ranking as I complete each task was okay on a post it - until I needed to extract the data electronically so I could analyze it. I was still struggling with letting go of Things and since I knew there was a way to extract the data I used that as my excuse to formally legitimize my inability to give up my favorite app. Unfortunately, my Coach asked me to try and see if I could work out how to use it to do Personal Kanban in a manner that was somewhat similar to what I had on my physical board.
It took a few tries, but I did manage to do get set up to do Personal Kanban in Things by grouping items into categories named after backlog columns. As I completed each task, before I checked the box, I would assign it a 3-digit number based on the rating listed above. But, I don't think I ever moved anything into Doing... they just went from not done, to done.
After a few weeks Boz and I reviewed the results and for the most part, the information they offered were things that were already been apparent. Going through this process did have one very significant result though. It caused me to pay more attention to how I felt about each thing I was doing while I was doing it and when I was finished doing it. I became more present with what I was doing and more aware of the impact it was having - which may be a significant contributor to the perception of value.
Using Things as a way to track all this also made me keenly aware of two additional points:
1. Trying to use Things to do Personal Kanban is kinda dumb
2. It was time to climb out of the value rabbit hole
My quest to understand the "value" of what I was doing had no clear answer save for the understanding that value can be a very subjective thing. I also had begun to feel like maybe the question was not, am I doing things that are not valuable, or how do I reduce the waste created by non-value adding activities, but how do I balance all the valuable things I want to work on. So, in many ways I was back to where I started.
I have lots to do.
I want/need to do it all.
I have limited time.
I need a way to decide what to do first - always
One key difference though is that as I continue to work through this, I am becoming more aware of how I am working and why. There are things in the system which are (technically) waste. Maybe those things needs to be there to keep the rest of the system in balance.
{Insert Climactic Ending Here}
If we were machines, perhaps all waste would be bad. Waste dampens productivity. But, we are not machines and maybe those dampeners are part of how we maintain our own productive flow. In examining the waste in my Personal Kanban practice, I have observed that it exists and that the effort required to eliminate that waste may not be worth the squeeze.
Posted on: October 02, 2013 11:54 AM |
Permalink
Comments (0)
Please login or join to subscribe to this item
Please Login/Register to leave a comment.
|
The smallest feline is a masterpiece.
- Leonardo da Vinci
|
