Project Management

Your PMO does not have a process problem. It has hotspots you are not seeing.

From the Operational Excellence in Project Management Blog
by
Leadership, PMO and Project Management

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

Is the PMO governing projects, or trying to control complexity with inadequate tools?

From Governance to Execution Intelligence: How PMOs Navigate Complexity

PMOs Navigating Complexity: From Coordination to Sensemaking

How to Measure PMO Impact Practically, Based on Evidence Rather Than Perception

How to Reposition the PMO for Real Influence

Categories

Agile, best practice, business agility, competence, Consulting, customer, customer succcess, Decision Making, Education, excellence, Governance, Government, Healthcare, Information Technology, Innovation, kamishibai, Leadership, leadership, lean, Organizational Project Management, PM in Academia, PMO, pmo, pmo, project leader, project manager, risk, risk management, scope, storytelling, team

Date

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  


When something is not working in the PMO, the reaction is usually predictable:
  • adjust the methodology
  • reinforce governance
  • add more controls
Even so, some problems keep showing up:
  • decisions being made outside the PMO
  • low adherence to practices
  • conflicts with business areas
  • questioning of the PMO’s value
If this is happening, it is unlikely to be a process problem.
It is a different type of issue.
A recurring pattern.

We call this a hotspot.



A hotspot is not an isolated error.
It is a recurring point of friction that indicates the PMO is not operating where it should.

A simple example:

A PMO with defined processes tools already implemented rituals in place
Even so, strategic decisions continue to happen outside of it.

The most common response:

“we need to reinforce governance”



But the PMO already controls processes well.

That is not where the problem is.

The problem is that relevant decisions are happening in a different space, where the PMO is not present.

In other words, it is not a process failure.

It is a positioning failure.



Where is the mistake



Most PMOs evolve by deepening control.

Few are able to expand influence.

And it is in this gap that hotspots emerge.

The PMO improves what it controls, but decisions remain outside its reach.



Result:



  • more effort
  • more structure
  • the same perception of value




The point that usually goes unnoticed

Solving this type of problem is not about reviewing processes.
It is also not about changing tools.

The real issue is different:

clearly understanding where the PMO actually operates

and where it should operate, but cannot



Without this clarity, any improvement tends to happen in the wrong place.

As a result, the PMO may evolve internally, but still struggle to demonstrate real impact.

This pattern is not isolated.

There is evidence that many organizations are mature in delivery, but still far from achieving effective business outcomes.



To reflect



If in your context there are:

  • decisions happening outside the PMO
  • low adherence to practices
  • a constant need to reinforce governance
it is worth questioning whether the problem is really execution.
Or whether you are dealing with hotspots.
This type of situation shifts the discussion.
It is no longer about method.
It becomes about where the PMO is positioned within the organization.
And this is where many realize they need to take the next step.
Posted on: March 18, 2026 04:27 PM | Permalink

Comments (1)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
avatar
Aaron Porter
Community Champion
IT Director| Blade HQ Payson, UT, United States
You've diagnosed a symptom and raised awareness of a problem. What's next?

What if it's not a positioning problem?

What can you realistically do about it if it is? Can a PMO actually reposition itself? Is the problem a lack of authority? A lack of trust? Is the PMO considered overhead?

PMO leaders can attempt to influence perception, demonstrate value differently, and adapt behaviors, but repositioning usually requires a combination of executive sponsorship, structural change, and alignment with how decisions actually get made.

You are right to call out "hot spots". If nothing else, they are a signal that there is a discrepancy between a person's perceptions, or desires, and reality. Understanding what they are signaling can keep you from trying to solve the wrong problem.

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS

"Laughter is the shortest distance between two people."

- Victor Borge

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors