The Scores in Project Management Maturity Assessments Don’t Matter!
From the The Professional Project Manager Blog
by Sean Whitaker
This series of articles examines, and offers insights and opinions, on all aspects of the profession of project management. I welcome your comments, feedback, support or dissent. I am passionate about the profession of project management and if, through our discussion, we can add value to the profession and practitioners then I am happy.
Recent Posts
The Scores in Project Management Maturity Assessments Don’t Matter!
Give the Project Manager Authority to be Successful
Meetings Are (Usually) Just Not Worth the Time!
The Importance of Benefits Management
How to Get Real Value from Lessons Learned
Categories
accountability,
agenda,
agile,
Artificial Intelligence,
authority,
BAC,
Benchmarking,
Benefits,
Benefits Realization,
Change Management,
communication,
Complexity,
Consulting,
CPI,
delegated authority,
EAC,
Earned Value Management,
entrepreneurship,
ISO21500,
Knowledge Transfer,
Leadership,
Lessons Learned,
Management,
managing change,
meetings,
mental health,
Methodologies,
methodology,
OPM,
Organizational Project Management,
outcomes,
outputs,
people,
People Skills,
people skills,
PMBOK Guide,
PMO,
PMP,
PMP Exam,
portfolio management,
practitioner development,
professional development,
project delivery,
project management,
Project Management Professional,
project manager,
project success,
responsibility,
risk,
skills,
soft skills,
software,
SPI,
standards,
strategic management,
strategy,
tailoring,
teamwork,
tools,
Total Project Management,
TPM,
travel,
waterfall,
Wellbeing
Date
I’ve completed many project management maturity assessments using the P3M3, OPM3, and 4Q models for clients, and they are a great tool for improving project management success but too many organisations get fixated on the scores that come out of the model. Some organisations think that if they are a 2 they need to be a 3; or if they are a 3 they need to be a 5 (the scale is usually 0-5 with 5 being the highest level of maturity). I know of one organisation that made it clear to the assessor that they would not accept any score less than 4 in any of the assessment areas because that is what their manager expected them to be (despite clearly not meeting the requirements for this).
The organisation’s that do this, and the consultants that allow it, are missing the point about these tools. The point of any maturity assessment should always be about success, specifically how the organisation defines success, and helping the organisation be more successful. The maturity assessment itself should take a snapshot of current levels of success and also the score from the model – this becomes the baseline. The next step is to work with the client to define what the future level of success should be, and then with this information define target scores in areas that the organisation should focus on to achieve these levels of success – achieving the new/higher scores is just an added bonus. It should always be about success and not about the score - there is a correlation not causation relationship between scores and success.
For example, I have personally seen that it is possible to have a highly successful organisation scoring low 3’s and an organisation scoring high 4’s that wasn’t successful at all due to unnecessary process and bureaucracy. For the first organisation there was room for slight improvement in areas that actually delivered value, and for the second organisation there was an opportunity to become more efficient but doing less.
One of the first questions you should ask when starting a maturity assessment is how successful are you, and how successful do you want to be? If the organisation can’t answer these then they are going to get a low score anyway and they probably have a range of issues to deal with. Once you have this information you can then use the model you want (P3M3, OPM3, & Praxis are all good models) to get scores from 0-5 in multiple areas of portfolio, programme, and project management.
The instead of arbitrarily recommending increases in scores, you need to focus on an increase in success, and use the model to identify the areas (and their scores) that will provide this uplift. The target scores should be focused on being more successful and not just getting a higher score.
And of course, the most important part of any maturity assessment are the recommendations for improvement. These need to be prioritised and achievable given organisational abilities and constraints.
So, if you are considering a project management maturity assessment, and you definitely should, make sure that the focus in on lifting your success rates, and not simply lifting the score.
- Full disclosure, I offer P3M3 assessments and I’ve worked with other models like the OPM3 model and 4Q model.
Posted on: January 22, 2024 04:47 PM |
Permalink
Comments (6)
Please login or join to subscribe to this item
Kwiyuh Michael Wepngong
Community Champion
Financial Management Specialist | US Peace Corps
Yaounde, Centre, Cameroon
Aaron Porter
Community Champion
IT Director| Blade HQ
Payson, UT, United States
Thank you! I have been saying this for a while. IF you need a maturity model, you evaluate the levels and determine where you fall, THEN determine where you want to get to AND how long to take/when to work on it. You may be a 1 or 2 in an area and decide to stay there. You may want to get to a 3 in another area, but you need to get to a 2 first so you tackle the changes to get to a 2 this month, work on a different level the following month, and then come back to move from a 2 to a 3 after that.
I worked at a company that tried, twice, to get to ITIL level 5. After the second time quitting we weren't allowed to bring it up again. It was originally considered a good idea, but there was no external mandate for it.
Rami Kaibni
Community Champion
Senior Projects Manager | Field & Marten Associates
New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Great post, Sean. I totally agree that the improvement recommendations is the most important part, However, I do find that sometimes organizations do put those recommendations on the shelf for an extended period of time and they could become invalid by the time they decide to start implementing them.
Great article! Thanks for sharing
Khai Ng.
IT PMO | IT Project Manager| TTGROUP
Hanoi, Viet Nam
That is true! Many Orgs just want to have higher point of assessment to polist their name in the field of service they are providing. They even prepare all things thus before the assessment period with only one reason is to pass the assessment. After that, they throw all things to the rush bin and get them out when the next assessment comes
Definitely a great addition. I have had the opportunity to do maturity assessments, and although we would arrive at a score, we were just mapping out the roadmap to get to the score. Your approach of considering current and future success gives it a very important complementarity and adds value. Thank you very much
Please Login/Register to leave a comment.
|
"Stop that! It's silly."
- Graham Chapman, Monty Python's Flying Circus
|