Getting a Return from Investment in Training
| Professional training is an important investment made by organisations to enhance their staff's level of competence and ultimately performance. But like all investments, it requires careful planning, clear objectives, and robust assessment processes to ensure it works and achieve its goals – otherwise it’s just an exercise in attendance. It helps if you start to look at investing in training as you would any other investment you could make. This means that you take a look at the costs of the investment and clearly outline the expected returns from it. This is useful to help you even choose the type of training that you should be sending people on. You should have a really clear idea of what sort of training you want people to go on for example will it be assessed or is it simply a matter of attending a course. Will it require practical demonstration of skills, will it result in a professional certification or qualification. Each of these provides different levels of training and teaching and as such different levels of competence development. So carefully consider the business case for each investment in training and have clear expectations about what you need the Next, when looking at different types of training look carefully about how the training has been put together. Is it a simple mishmash of opinions of a particular subject matter expert or has it been put together using something like blooms taxonomy which will clearly indicate what the level of teaching or training is aimed at and what the expected outcomes from participating and completing in the training will be. This is definitely a question that you should be asking any training provider so that you can move away from training that does not have defined learning outcomes. Once people have been on the training and completed it you then need a way to determine whether it was worthwhile and whether you achieved the expected results from it. I'm always surprised at this point that a lot of people simply assume that attendance at training will lead to the expected and desired uplift and competence. But this isn't always the case and you will need to have in place some way of measuring an uplift in competence and a change in performance. My personal preference is to use Kirkpatrick's Four-Level Training Evaluation Model, which provides a framework to assess training efficacy at different levels:
Using this model, organizations can evaluate the immediate and long-term impact of training on both the individual and organizational levels get a really clear picture of whether or not the training has had the desired impact or not. Every organization, and indeed every individual, has unique needs. Training programs need to be tailored to address these specific needs to be effective. A well-thought-out training program, developed with clear objectives in mind, ensures that it addresses these needs. Professional training is not just about conducting sessions and workshops. It's about ensuring that these sessions lead to desired outcomes, transforming both individuals and organizations. Using tools like Blooms Taxonomy for defining objectives and Kirkpatrick's model for assessment ensures that training is both comprehensive and effective. Remember, training without thoughtful planning and assessment is an exercise in futility. Invest wisely! (For those keen on diving deeper, Blooms Taxonomy and the Kirkpatrick model have been extensively discussed in academic and professional literature. A quick search can provide numerous resources for further reading.) |
Tips for the Novice Project Manager
| I often get asked by junior or novice project managers for any tips I can give them as they begin their careers in project management. I don’t always have time to think things through on the spot so I have taken the time to note my top 8 tips. I would love to hear what tips you would also give.
So that’s what I think are 8 important tips for novice or junior project managers. What did I miss? |
Should a Project Manager have Technical Skills in the Area they are Managing?
| Should a project manager should have technical skills in the area of the project work? This is a question I am asked frequently. Should someone running an IT project come from an IT background? Should a project manager managing a construction project have a construction or engineering background? Some people say they definitely should and some people say they shouldn’t.
The answer is actually quite simple - it all depends on the size and complexity of the project.
To begin with I need to clarify that technical work, whether its hardware, software, construction, or infrastructure related, is very different from project management work. Technical work requires a technical background, training and expertise about a particular field and using this experience to make technical decisions, often associated with the product of the project. Project management work, on the other hand is about managing the project. It involves the initiation work, the planning work, the executing work, monitoring and controlling work and the closing work. It is the developed of plans, monitoring of progress, controlling change and delivering a project to name but a few areas. If the project is small, then it may be that the person charged with being a project manager may also be completing some technical work on the project and as such it’s a balancing act. At times they will do technical work and at other times they will do project management work. The project is simply neither big enough nor complex enough to warrant having specialist technical and project management staff. If the project is large and complex then, without doubt, the person acting as project manager needs to be focussed totally on one thing and one thing only, the management of the project. I’ve often said that the easiest way to understand what a project manager is, is to replace reword the title to General Manager of a project. We all know what a General Manager does and if they are a General Manager of a large organisation they come from a management background not necessarily a technical background. Or if they have come from a technical background the best general managers have made a conscious decision at some point in their careers to leave behind their technical background and embrace a new career as a manager. This is exactly the same as being a project manager. For larger projects the project manager must be focussed on managing the project and everything that entails, and not be distracted by the technical requirements of the work to be done. On a larger project the team should be big enough that there are other people charged with being technical experts. The biggest problem a project manager with a technical skill can have is the inability to let go of their technical background and move onto managing the project. At some point in their careers, to be successful, they must make the decision to become full time project managers and leave behind their technical background. If they don’t they will do neither job well. A complex project requires a full time project manager. Additionally, the skilled teams responsible for the technical work don’t need someone undermining and second guessing them. This leads us to the emergence of a new breed of project managers who are entering the profession as professional project managers with degrees and diplomas in project manager and not the typical technical background. The entry of these people into the market will change the way we view the profession. We will begin to look for people with project management credentials and experience to lead projects. There will always be a demand for both sorts of project manger though. We will always have a career path for technical experts to become part or full time project managers, and there will be a growing awareness and value placed upon those professional project managers whether they come from tertiary education, or have made the decision at some point in their careers to be a professional project manager.
|



