Project Management

The Genius of the 'AND'

From the pmStudent Blog
by
Ranting and raving about project management and systems engineering.

About this Blog

RSS

Recent Posts

The Problem with Project Management

The Problem with Project Management

The Problem with Project Management

LinkedIn Recommendations Are Easy

The Catch-22 of Project Management Certification and Experience

Categories

Agile, Career Development, Certification, Change Management, Communications Management, Cost Management, Documentation, Earned Value Management, Education, Integration and Test, Kanban, Leadership, Lean, Lessons Learned, Methodology, Misc, Multitasking, New Project, Operations, Planning, PMP, Productivity, Professional Development, Project Estimation, Project Leadership, Quality, Requirements Management, Risk Management, Schedule Management, Scope Management, Software, Systems Thinking, Tools, Video, Work Breakdown Structures (WBS)

Date

linkedin twitter facebook Request to reuse this  

Categories: Project Leadership


Ty posted an interesting piece on leadership that I commented on, and am about to expound upon here.  He referred to successful project work being led, not managed.

I'm going to disagree, at least slightly on what may just amount to terminology.

Successful project-based work is led AND managed.

There is a false dichotomy between leadership and management that I often see. While it is true that you can be a leader without being a manager, and you can be a manager without being a leader, the highest state (for a project manager) to achieve is both simultaneously. As my former PM mentor and engineer Brian Bernhard used to say, it's the "genius of the AND".

LombardiA general, CEO, technical innovator, or scientist can get away with being a great leader and lousy manager if and only if they surround themselves with great managers. The general and CEO in that case rely on their vision and strategic capabilities, and the technical innovator and scientist rely on their ability to create movements through technical breakthroughs.

A team manager can get away with being a great manager and a lousy leader if the environment doesn't call for innovation or great leaps forward; change is infrequent and most of the activity is similar to the way it was the day before or last year. Here, you need a great manager who understands how to manage people effectively day-in and day-out.

For a project manager, you really need to aspire to having both qualities. With the change and constant need to generate and sustain momentum towards a common goal, you can't be successful for long without developing at least a minimum amount of both qualities.

 

Leadership is a sexy attribute that everyone wants to be associated with.  However, do not forget about the importance of effective management.  Frankly, I don't want to hire project managers who can not manage teams, stakeholders, and projects effectively.

To use a sports analogy, it's about blocking and tackling combined with inspiration and empowerment.  A good coach needs to be effective at both leadership and management, not one or the other.

We are project coaches.


Posted on: April 21, 2010 12:54 AM | Permalink

Comments (4)

Please login or join to subscribe to this item
avatar
Ty Kiisel Manager Social Outreach| AtTask Lehi, Ut, United States
Josh,

Although I don't entirely disagree with you, leadership is a lot more than a "sexy attribute that everyone wants to be associated with." Leadership is the key to great project management even if the "environment doesn't call for great leaps forward." Lombardi was not a manager, his career has been associated with great leadership. I agree that to be a great project "leader" you need to be a great project "manager," but I don't think you can be a great project manager if you're not a great leader. Particularly in today's economy. Those project managers who tend to be the most successful tend to also be great leaders, like Lombardi. I think your last sentence says it all, and I agree. "A good coach needs to be effective at both leadership and management, not one of the other."

Thanks for weighing in on this Josh. I believe this is a really important topic.

avatar
Josh Nankivel Engineering Project Manager| Apple Sioux Falls, Sd, United States
Thanks Ty. I think we do agree on the topic, at least for the majority of it.

avatar
John HUGHES Senior Lecturer Project Management| UWBS Telford, United Kingdom
Deming said that for things to work well we need a balance between leadership and management, I guess this is a bit of a ying and yang thing, different sides of a "whole". If you are not necessarily gifted in one area but are in the other then where should you focus? Recognising strengths and weaknesses is stage 1, stage 2 is doing something about it. The concepts around Belbin and Myers-Briggs is that of recognition, not acceptance, the power of those analysis is what we then do with them - improve ourselves, hire in some "balance" in the team - ie treat it as we would any risk - manage it.

avatar
Josh Nankivel Engineering Project Manager| Apple Sioux Falls, Sd, United States

Thanks for the insight John!


I really like your points about acting on the areas for improvement after recognizing them. As I was reading your comment the point about hiring "balance" in the team came to mind, and then I saw your point on it...we''re on the same wavelength.


-Josh

pmStudent e-Learning

Please Login/Register to leave a comment.

ADVERTISEMENTS

"I have taken more good from alcohol than alcohol has taken from me."

- Winston Churchill

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsors